I don't understand why both "fathers" should so vehemently take Dean's side over Mick's, when previous history would show who is likely to be the more reliable and which the more likely to be lying.
I don't understand why both "fathers" should so vehemently take Dean's side over Mick's, when previous history would show who is likely to be the more reliable and which the more likely to be lying.
Dazzle (08-04-2015), flappinfanny (13-04-2015), maidmarian (08-04-2015), sarah c (10-04-2015), tammyy2j (08-04-2015)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)