Page 740 of 1084 FirstFirst ... 240640690730738739740741742750790840 ... LastLast
Results 7,391 to 7,400 of 10831

Thread: Eastenders - Current Episode Discussion - VIII

  1. #7391
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    482
    Thanked: 257
    Quote Originally Posted by sarah c View Post
    Phil will just use brute force, whereas max does have the law on his side (albeit acquired in a dodgy way!!)

    max needs to get the locks changed on the Arches and establish occupation pdq
    Perhaps but doesn't matter if Max has the law or not. Phil will either force Max to hand it back over or else.

    Best case scenario for Max is to actually be Lucy's killer so he is safe away from Phil. xD

  2. #7392
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    23,177
    Thanked: 12315
    If Charlie tells Max that Nick is the real cause of the crash Max might show some heart and give the Arches back to Phil and Ben

  3. #7393
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    482
    Thanked: 257
    Quote Originally Posted by tammyy2j View Post
    If Charlie tells Max that Nick is the real cause of the crash Max might show some heart and give the Arches back to Phil and Ben
    Hmm perhaps but not quite sure if Phil would call it quits. I'd like to think there is good in Phil.

  4. #7394
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    482
    Thanked: 257
    .
    Last edited by xx_Dan_xx; 13-01-2015 at 15:56.

  5. #7395
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    8,310
    Thanked: 10220
    I've been doing some more thinking about the power of attorney business.

    If I'm remembering the sequence of events correctly, Phil found out about Sharon and Marcus trying to con him several weeks before the wedding (which is when he and Ritchie set up the power of attorney).

    The thing is, Phil didn't even know where Ben was at this time as the latter didn't turn up until a day or two before the wedding, so the signature must have been forged. If Ben realised this, he was hardly going to complain since it gave him what he wanted.

    I wish the writers would make the details clear but I suppose they think the average viewer neither knows nor cares about the finer details of the law (the same goes for Kat's inheritance too). To be honest, the details of the POA didn't occur to me until you lot started discussing it.

  6. #7396
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,449
    Thanked: 1912
    Quote Originally Posted by Dazzle View Post
    According to the government's website, Phil could have appointed Ben as a lasting power of attorney over his property and financial affairs:

    \"A lasting power of attorney (LPA) is a legal document that lets you (the ‘donor’) appoint one or more people (known as ‘attorneys’) to help you make decisions or make decisions on your behalf.

    This gives you more control over what happens to you if, for example, you have an accident or an illness and can’t make decisions at the time they need to be made (you ‘lack mental capacity’).

    You must be 18 or over and have mental capacity – the ability to make your own decisions – when you make your LPA.

    There are 2 types of LPA:

    health and welfare
    property and financial affairs

    You can choose to make one type or both.\"


    Ben must have signed forms at the time so he couldn't have not known what was happening (unless his signature was forged - which I wouldn't put past Phil and Ritchie). If he knew, maybe he just assumed it'd been rescinded by now.

    \"The donor will ask you to be their attorney. If you agree, you’ll need to sign their lasting power of attorney (LPA) form.\"

    Sarah's right that an LPA needs to be registered, but it could have been done straight away which would make it stand right now.

    \"Register your LPA with the Office of the Public Guardian (this can take up to 10 weeks).\"

    \"It can be used as soon as it’s registered, with your permission.\"


    This all seems to fit into the current storyline to me.
    I agree with your summary above Dazzle
    had read the info on website and the info
    abt variations recently and before ( for family
    reasons)
    As you will know there is a lot more- but
    too much to quote.
    Government guidance on a website is their
    current interepation of the law and the
    acts that underpin it. People can and do
    challenge their intereptations in test cases-
    unlikely in EE but does happen in real life
    and where big legal firms get their income.


    Its when its in a personal context you can
    see its potential effects on real people.


    But re Phil- it just seems a bit out of character
    as he as been in a similar siuation various times
    before ( when Ben either not born or child) -
    I thought he would have a different attitude
    to handing over the control of an LPA
    when there are other ways of doing things.

    But soap characters do change over years
    and are perceived in various ways by different
    viewers.

    Purely as a matter of interest- I know you
    pay attention to detail and I have missed
    some bits recently (being away on family
    matters) - have you heard the term
    Lasting Power of Attorney actually mentioned
    on the prog or just Power of Attorney?

    It would be very boring to have everything
    spelt out in detail. But sometimes a couple
    of clear sentences would avoid confusion
    and there are repititious bits could be cut!!

    wait to see what happens next!

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to maidmarian For This Useful Post:

    Dazzle (13-01-2015)

  8. #7397
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    8,310
    Thanked: 10220
    Quote Originally Posted by maidmarian View Post
    Purely as a matter of interest- I know you
    pay attention to detail and I have missed
    some bits recently (being away on family
    matters) - have you heard the term
    Lasting Power of Attorney actually mentioned
    on the prog or just Power of Attorney?
    No, the term Lasting Power of Attorney hasn't been used on the programme.

    I searched for "Power of Attorney" but that brings you to the LPA page on the government's website. There's also Enduring Power of Attorney, but that's now been superceded by Lasting Power of Attorney.

    I didn't read any of the numerous legal websites that came up on my search in depth, but did spot "Limited Power of Attorney" being mentioned. Since the government's information fit with the storyline I just went with that in my post.

    Regarding whether it's in Phil's character to do such a thing, I'd say that since the point was to cut Sharon out of his affairs when he married her, I can go along with it. Ben wasn't in Phil's life at the time so it must have seemed very unlikely that Ben would ever get power over Phil's affairs. I guess Phil forgot about it with the shooting drama etc.
    Last edited by Dazzle; 13-01-2015 at 17:07.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Dazzle For This Useful Post:

    maidmarian (13-01-2015)

  10. #7398
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    28,665
    Thanked: 16215
    babe was or is on love with stan too, he must have been a looker in his hay day

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lizann For This Useful Post:

    Dazzle (14-01-2015), tammyy2j (14-01-2015)

  12. #7399
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    8,310
    Thanked: 10220
    Excellent episode last night!

    I wonder if Nick's gone for good? I can't see it somehow. I'm sure the resolution to this story will be much more dramatic. Yvonne's goodbye felt more final.

    I'm torn between feeling sorry for Dot and being frustrated at her gullibility. At least she's accepted Nick's guilt quickly this time I suppose.

    I must say that Aleks had shown a whole new layer of his personality playing the househusband. I think he's been a bit of a saint personally. I know Roxy wanted to be with Ronnie but surely the latter would've preferred that her sister spent the majority of her time looking after the baby, not leaving him with latest in a long line of boyfriends.

    I wish Jay would just tell Abi her boyfriends gay! But then, would she believe him?
    Last edited by Dazzle; 14-01-2015 at 13:37.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dazzle For This Useful Post:

    Glen1 (14-01-2015), tammyy2j (14-01-2015)

  14. #7400
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Shropshire
    Posts
    1,269
    Thanked: 2131
    Cracking episode , the whole storyline has become a welcome break from the Lucy Beale whodunit or who didn't do it imo. Thought there was a distinct tear in John Altman's eyes in his final scenes with June Brown , perhaps it was their last time as Nick and Dot ,and he was sensitive to that.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Glen1 For This Useful Post:

    Dazzle (14-01-2015), maidmarian (14-01-2015), tammyy2j (14-01-2015)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •