The summary by the judge was good and may have been done to make us hope that he will be found not guilty. The fact that Peter is shocked at the verdict confuses me. Shocked that he is free to go or shocked that he goes back inside? Cannot wait
The summary by the judge was good and may have been done to make us hope that he will be found not guilty. The fact that Peter is shocked at the verdict confuses me. Shocked that he is free to go or shocked that he goes back inside? Cannot wait
I haven't seen the trailer, but the fact that Peter looks shocked at the verdict reaffirms the feeling I have that he'll be found guilty. Or, as Glen says, it could be declared a mistrial and he'll have to go through the whole thing again. In the run up to the trial, and during most of it, he's seemed confident he'll be found not guilty to me.
We'll know one way or the other in just over 24 hours.
Last edited by Dazzle; 19-10-2014 at 17:32.
parkerman (19-10-2014)
Yes, I know it has to be unanimous, but when else in all the soap trials we've had do we get to see the judge summing up and specially making that point? There's always a reason for these things in Soapland.
The judge would not let them out very quickly if they do not reach an agreement. Very unlikely the agreement is that they are undecided then
Perdita (20-10-2014)
That is not necessarily the case. Yes, the Judge will urge them to reach a verdict, but, if even after as short a period as a day, the foreman says that in his/her opinion they have no chance of reaching a verdict then the judge could declare a retrial. For example, it could be a 6-6 which doesn't change at all during the day after due consideration and deliberation. It's unusual but has happened.
Guilty!!![]()
Dazzle (21-10-2014)
Oh no i missed it!
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)