well jake should not be interested the phedofile
well jake should not be interested the phedofile
she over 16 so he isnt a "pedophile"Originally Posted by crazygirl
No he isn't. I don't think it can be as bad as it sounds, because Jake has always struck me as a decent person. Maybe Jake doesn't know she's not yet 18. She drinks alcohol in the club and hangs out with Deano and Bradley who are both 18. She's not backwards at coming forwards, but if she's drunk he would be taking advantage. I don't think Stacey would be an innocent party though.Originally Posted by bondboffin
It could be that while he drags her out the Vic it's to tell her to stop the flirting or whatever.
What are the pictures of? I know that Stacey flirts with him so if it's just of that The Daily Star could have gotten the rest wrong like they usually do.
If they have Jake flirt back or plan to sleep with her it'll be wrong because while Stacey is over 16, she is still technically a child, and it's just not in Jake's character at all.
Last edited by BlackKat; 19-02-2006 at 20:12.
i personally can't see Stacey and Jake together. I think she is suited to someone more her age.
i agree that it is not in jakes character it would be like when ruby had a crush on danny (isnt danny younger than jake and ruby the same age as stacy) jake seems like the type to protect agirl in these circumstances not take advantage
What is so wrong with 17 year old been with an older man. It is not wrong or dirty if they both agree. I was 18 when I met my ex husband and he was 28. Are you saying that is it wrong to have a relationship with someone who is not your own age?
Super Mod
it was only a figure of speech but she is still classed has a child so jake should be saying go away you annoying childOriginally Posted by bondboffin
i love Stacey so the more we see of her on screen the better as for the age difference i dont think it mattters at all. Funny to see how dot and jim when they find Bradleys been lamped for the 2nd time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)