Son of Cain (11-08-2022)
Stu was probably innocent but I can't believe that he was denied a solicitor. Even 27 years ago, it was standard practice.
Son of Cain (11-08-2022)
I thought Stu might have covered for his daughter but now I realise she would have been too young so I think he covered for his ex-wife who might have killed the waitress out of jealousy and Stu did not want his daughter to grow up with a mum in prison... Stu would have had a solicitor but he confessed so nothing any legal representative could have done to defend him.
Why does Stu not sit down in the cafe and write a letter to Yasmeen and explain that way what really happened?
Perdita (11-08-2022)
Perdita (11-08-2022), Son of Cain (12-08-2022)
Yes, but he could still have masterminded the so-called gunmen who supposedly forced Ryan into carrying out the robbery and, if the police accepted Ryan's story, he could still be arrested in prison and sent for trial.
Of course, in the wonderful world of Weatherfield justice all this will be conveniently forgotten.
parkerman (11-08-2022), Perdita (12-08-2022), Son of Cain (12-08-2022)
There are currently 4417 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4417 guests)