I couldn't remember. I know Lauren knew the truth, and Peter knew that she knew, but did the rest of his family?
Printable View
I agree, although in fairness some were thinking that Peter wouldn't have told Lauren the whole truth as we didn't hear the words.
Strange that we had a whole scene without Jane noticing/commenting on the fact that Lauren is pregnant. Would have preferred "Stop covering for Bobby or Ian will never see his grandchild" myself.
So who would have got the insurance money if there was any? I'm pretty certain that insurance companies would look oddly at any requests for it to not go to family followed so closely by the 'deaths' ...
I don't remember much detail from the time it happened - I have a vague memory of Ian going to SA but that's it.
So who would have got the insurance money if there was any? I'm pretty certain that insurance companies would look oddly at any requests for it to not go to family followed so closely by the 'deaths' ...
I don't remember much detail from the time it happened - I have a vague memory of Ian going to SA but that's it.
I'm going to guess and say that Gavin's sister would have received it (though if it were a joint policy which it looks like it was, that in itself doesn't explain why Ian didn't get any, with some being left in trust for Ben.) It was Gavin's sister that the Beales were in contact with in 2006, so perhaps she is in on it. Maybe Gavin concocted some explanation for the insurers that Kathy didn't get on with her children so no money was to go to them, though as I've already said, I don't find the way this whole Kathy situation is going realistic.
Phil has known about this for three years from an email Kathy sent to the Arches? Yet they haven't told us when Phil first saw her again. Hoax emails from dead people do happen; Steven was "Cindy" back in 2007. Surely Phil, having been stalked by Ben little more than 6 months prior, wouldn't just have taken her word for it.
Funnily enough I bought Den's resurrection. My 11 year old self was easily satisfied.
To be fair to Sharon, I think she reacted exactly the way most people would have if they discovered the mother of a very close friend had faked their death. It's even worse for Sharon because she knows exactly how Ian will feel. She doesn't know why Kathy did it, and at the moment she doesn't want to know because she's so angry on Ian and Ben's behalf. She's bound to calm down and listen at some stage, although it looks to me like the writers are setting them up as enemies from the off.
I can't remember either, but I took it from the duff duff that Jane wasn't supposed to realise Lauren knew.
Gavin's sister "identified" the bodies so she must have been in on it. It might also come out that some local police were paid to look the other way too.
If it was Gavin's insurance policy, and his sister was his closest relative after Kathy, surely it would seem natural that she be the beneficiary?
We're obviously going to be able to find holes if we look for them. They've engineered a story to bring Kathy back and I'll probably accept it as long as Kathy didn't just cold-heartedly abandon Ian and Ben - which doesn't appear to the case. It's obvious a lot of thought has gone into the details.
The fact is that truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction, as evidenced by the canoe man story upon which Kathy's resurrection has been loosely based.
Marcus is a good solicitor, he is tearing each witness apart one by one showing a new suspect each time
Why cant Lauren tell Abi and Cora the truth :angry:
I'm finding the line about Ben taking Denny for a hair cut hilarious, seeing as he's about to show up with a new head.