.................
Printable View
.................
There's no guarantee Ian will find out though. The viewers might be the only ones in on the secret.
Also, Peter is very high on the suspect list and I doubt that Ian would tell the police if he found out that Peter killed Lucy. The same may go for several others close to Ian, especially if they can give Ian a satisfactory explanation of what happened that night.
Whitney hated Lucy and I think she's capable of hiding it if she's the killer, rather than spend 15 years in jail. I'd say the same for some others too.
I don't think anything's set in stone and Dominic Treadwell-Collins may well have been leaving false trails for us in his interviews.
Well Ian's track record on his quest for justice for Lucy isn't so good so far, lied to the police giving a false alibi for the night of the murder, and now willing to withhold evidence which might be important to the enquiry. Ian doesn't know otherwise or does he ? Also it may only be the viewers who get to know who the killer is next Feb ,EE quite capable of continuing to draw out the storyline for further months imo.
Sorry Dazzle, only just seen ,I've duplicated some of the points' you've already made.
Great minds... :D
About this issue of looking guilty. To use Whitney as an example again, she looked very shifty and guilty for a few episodes when the focus was on her around the time Tamwar found her note, but has since been acting as normal.
However, we had absolutely no indication from Stacey's behaviour that she was guilty of Archie's murder, so I don't think we can conclude that lack of guilt in everyday episodes signifies innocence in Eastenders.