Printable View
thats true, we didnt see the body so its not completely certain that he died or that the body is buried under the vic it could be somewhere else. however, bringing den back would be very unbelievable and unrealistic and i think that for a lot of people it would make ee a laughing stock!Quote:
Originally Posted by ghosthunter5487
By coming back in 2006, it may mean that his body is found in 2006. This would be him technically coming back into the storyline.
Zoe does tell Kat what happened to Den
really? I know it was rumoured but I didn't know it was true. Where did you get this from? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
I think this is a fab storyline!!!! I know Zoe has already filmed her exit scenes last week, so surely the scriptwriters have used the Den storyline as part of this. Wouldn't it be stupid not to? I find it hard to believe that after all the hype surrounding this storyline, Zoe would just be allowed to ride happily off into the sunset! Especially since she still believes she killed him. It would not be feasible if this storyline was forgot about for Zoe's exit. I also think that as Kim Medcalfe is due to leave the show, that surely that fateful night is bound to come back and haunt Sam. Chrissie is so cool, calm, and collected.... she can hold herself together! I think she will get away with it!! I can't wait to see how it all unfolds!!!!
I really hope Chrissie gets away with it!
i hope chrissie doesnt leave
i would like this to happen
I heard that when den was buried he was just unconcious, the concrete hadn't set when he regained conciousness and he crawled out without anyone knowing and he'll be coming back.
Now i doubt this because of what he did to get sacked, but its always possible with Eastenders.
Anyone know if theres any truth in that?
I doubt it very much Eastenders bosses made the mistake once of bringing him back and if they want to axe the show copmpletely this will be a very goood way of going about it he's dead and he aint coming back it aint Dallas