Chrissie Watts

Yes I think the stuff with Sam and Chrissie along with Dennis and Sharon is going to be gripping! I assume that Sharon and Dennis are going to believe that Chrissie wasn't behind the murder. And then there'll be Phil, Grant and Peggy on Sam's side. But maybe it won't take too much to convince Dennis and Sharon that Chrissie could have something to hide.

Obviously I don't know what's going to happen but I think it would be great if Sharon and Dennis started off being on Chrissie's side but then gradually as they started to become more suspicious, take the side of the Mitchells. And they help each other get rid of Chrissie once and for all.

I know the Mitchells and the Watts have never been close (well Sharon has been close to them a lot! lol.), but I think it's a case of keeping your enemies close and they could really use each other to their own advantage.

yeah that is true.

This is why I love EastEnders so much. It's really pulling itself together now.

sorry if this has aready been sent but , if there was n proof that chrissie did it there wouldnt be any proof that sam did it would there? and she can hardly frame her can she and make it out that it was sam can she? of she could then how coz i have no clue , and if she uses a nother eapon and uses her own blood to wipe all over it to make that the weapon they used then they would do a dna teat and blood test and fingerprint teat and it will have all her fingrprints over it and not sams ... ?!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kat 4 alfie

sorry if this has aready been sent but , if there was n proof that chrissie did it there wouldnt be any proof that sam did it would there? and she can hardly frame her can she and make it out that it was sam can she? of she could then how coz i have no clue , and if she uses a nother eapon and uses her own blood to wipe all over it to make that the weapon they used then they would do a dna teat and blood test and fingerprint teat and it will have all her fingrprints over it and not sams ... ?!

---

The murder weapon and Den will have Sam's fingerprints all over them. They'll have Chrissie's aswell but that's hardly unusual considering she won't have to lie about giving Pauline the dog back and Den's her husband so it's not unusual that her fingerprints are all over him and her pub.

no matter how much Chrisse would have cleaned it will still have Chrisses, Sam and zoes fingerprints on it.
So the poilce will have to inspect them all.

Not necessarily. You just have to wipe it and fingerprints disappear.

i know it will have both of there finger prints on my point exactly so i dont know how sam could be arrested and chrissie not ! and how would the police wknow that the weapon was the dog ? if one of them told the police that that ws the weapon then it would be odviouse that it was them or that they knew bout it ! so i was just sayin that if chrissie planted something to make it seam that sam did it , how would she , its kind of imposible coz she cant use a nother weapon and plant that as the weapon coz then she will have to put hr blood on it and it wont have sams fingerprints on just hers , and the police will be able to find out that that was new blood and that it wasnt dens . im just sayin if she did do that not that she would but what could she do to plant sam in it ? ... thats just what i was gettin at if you know what i mean !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by squarelady

Not necessarily. You just have to wipe it and fingerprints disappear.

---

Depends, if the fingers are in blood even if its clean to the naked eye, the police can use luminal to show up blood

Sorry been watching too many forensic detectives!

True but she did try her best to scrub it very well!