So the BBC and the writers denied Bradley's suicide leap yet it happened
Printable View
So the BBC and the writers denied Bradley's suicide leap yet it happened
It didn't look that much like a suicide leap though looked more like he lost his balance and fell backwards.
Perhaps we'll never know lol.....
thats what I thought,, looked like he lost his footing and toppled over the edge,, wan't a sucide.. nope was purely unintentional ..or at least that is how it seemed to me
I think it was, to be honest, The Sun usually publishes very true spoilers, as much as I hate to admit it
EastEnders star Charlie Clements has admitted that he is feeling "drained" and "emotional" after performing his character's death scene live to the nation.
Earlier tonight, viewers watched Clements's alter ego Bradley Branning fall from the roof of the Queen Vic while being chased by police investigating Archie Mitchell's murder.
Speaking immediately afterwards on BBC Three's EastEnders Live: The Aftermath, Clements commented: "I am drained of everything, I tell you! It's crazy. It's been so emotional. It was a big way to go out."
In the moments after his roof fall, Bradley's guilt-ridden wife Stacey (Lacey Turner) was seen confessing to Max (Jake Wood) that she was Archie's killer, bringing the BBC soap's long-running murder mystery plotline to a climax.
On the choice of Stacey as the culprit, Clements said: "I am surprised. I didn't know who it was going to be. [The producers have] done wonders. It was probably the biggest secret on TV ever!"
Meanwhile, Clements's co-star Nina Wadia (Zainab Masood) revealed that the actor had shed tears over his soap exit before the live episode went on air.
She said: "He was teary before filming. He was very teary."
I guess they will never admit to suicide now, not after denying it
I don't understand why he was fretting so much about the police,he didn't kill Archie so why was he so woried?...........UNLESS! he knew Stacey did it and was protecting her?
The police found his blood at the scene after he biffed Archie. He had motive, opportunity and his blood was there. Looks pretty incriminating....
And don't tell me innocent people never get found guilty of crimes they didn't actually commit!
Wonder why they didnt find any DNA from Stacey on the StatueQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Do we know they didn't? Weren't they testing everyone for DNA? Has Stacey been tested yet?Quote:
Originally Posted by alan45
they were only testing white males, so obviously something in the DNA determines sex, race etc.