did kathy or phil say when they made contact with each other
Printable View
did kathy or phil say when they made contact with each other
I just remembered; when Sharon first went to that solicitor to ask about who her birth father really was, the solicitor mentioned about hearing someone with the name 'Gavin'. Sharon and...Ian, was it? went to see Dot in prison, to ask if she knew anyone with that name.
Kathy emailed Phil when she heard Ben had been convicted of Heather's manslaughter, so it was several years ago. I think the evening of the live episode was the first time they met in person.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
Yes, it's a very popular fan theory that Gavin is Sharon's biological father, and the writers seem to be hinting at it with Sharon's remark about Ian being like a brother to her (they'll be step-siblings if she is Gavin's daughter).Quote:
Originally Posted by storyseeker1
Kathy said tonight she contacted Phil when she heard about Heather's deathQuote:
Originally Posted by lizann
And Phil told Ronnie the same thing when Ronnie first found out.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
.
sally gavin sister helped fake the deaths
So Kathy received to jail time for faking her death for insurance money
She got a suspended sentence....so if she fakes her own death again it's off to jail with her for two years.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
I missed the episode -so not sure if theQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
suspension was conditional or unconditional.
Like most legal matters it is complicated!
But I thought if it was condtional the sentence
could be re-instituted if the person committed
any crime??
It wasn't made clear, mm. She just told Ian and Jane that she'd got two years suspended.Quote:
Originally Posted by maidmarian
no mention of paying back the insurance money
her daughter donna is dead if i remember rightly
You remember rightly ... Donna overdosed on heroin and diedQuote:
Originally Posted by lizann
an affair with buster on the cards for kathy
I guess it's better than an affair with Phil...Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
he has already too many women carmel next for him :p if she stops stalking massoodQuote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
he has already too many women carmel next for him :p if she stops stalking massoodQuote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
Her return has been quite a let down a complete damp squib (pun on Buster :p) so far
What was the point of compromising EE's credibility if they didn't have big plans for the character?Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
I seem to remember they had big plans for Gavin as well as the greatest villain unhung. A complete waste of time investing in a ridiculous story to bring either or both of them back. But that was DTC for you!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
changing her name back to beale why? Go back to her original own surname
She is still married to GavinQuote:
Originally Posted by lizann
She can call herself whatever she likes, though presumably she also intends on changing her name legally. The Beale thing would make sense to me if she only had Ian (or if Ben was also a Beale), but as things stand it would be more diplomatic to go back to her maiden name.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
SOC obviously just wants Kathy Beale back in all her glory :D (and in fairness she's much improved lately, and putting her back in the cafe was a good move).
I get all that but somehow I am still finding it hard to like the character the way I did before she "died" .... maybe because of the more than ridiculous storyline(s) involved with her return ... :searchme:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
EastEnders has reintroduced one of its biggest villains of all time, with James Willmott-Brown unveiled as the returning character from Kathy Beale's past.
Fan speculation has been in overdrive since yesterday's episode ended with a mystery figure leaving flowers among the tributes to Steven Beale outside the burned-out restaurant.
Willmott-Brown – played by William Boyde – is the evil businessman who raped Kathy back in 1988, serving a three-year prison sentence as a result.
The other big talking point this week has been the fact that Fi Browning and Josh Hemmings were revealed to be siblings – and EastEnders continued to connect all the dots in tonight's big episode.
Friday's scenes saw Max Branning collect his old cell mate Luke from prison and take him home, where his sister Fi, his half-brother Josh, and his uncle Hugo (previously known only as Weyland & Co's mysterious Chairman) were waiting for him.
It was then revealed that Fi, Luke and Josh are all Willmott-Brown's children – the elder two from his marriage to Elizabeth Browning, and Josh from his later relationship with Wendy Hemmings.
The plot twist became clear when Max was introduced to Willmott-Brown in the closing moments of the episode.
Viewers have known for a while that a vengeful Max has teamed up with the Chairman of Weyland and Co, who appears to have some big and worrying plans for Walford. Although Max's intentions were always revenge-focused, it was never entirely clear who he was actually working for – or why – but it's now apparent that the Chairman is Willmott-Brown's brother-in-law Hugo, the brother of his first wife.
With the help of his family, Willmott-Brown will continue his mission to slowly take over Albert Square in a story of power, control, money and revenge.
We can reveal that the family are planning to destroy everything and anyone in their way – with it looking like the Carters are in big trouble thanks to Hugo's announcement tonight regarding The Vic.
However, Max has no idea of Willmott-Brown's history or connections to Walford, only that he claims to be a wronged man – like him.
This storyline has been secretly plotted since Max returned to Walford at Christmas and will come to a head over the coming months.
Those involved in the plan were sworn to secrecy about their involvement with Willmott-Brown and each other, but with each family member having their own agenda, can any of them really trust each other? And with ruthless Willmott-Brown ruling the clan, is anyone in Walford really safe?
Of course, there is one other person on Willmott-Brown's agenda: Kathy Beale, who he blames for ruining his life. What does Willmott-Brown's return mean for Kathy?
Speaking of his return to EastEnders, William Boyde said: "I'm delighted to immerse myself once more in the fascinating world of Soapland."
Digital Spy
Even getting JWB back now, I find Kathy's return from the dead a let down
what will she buy with 100,000 or will ben take?
She was looking at the Albert
She was indeed. But 100,000 for a building like that in that part of London....hmmmmmmm......Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz21
Little unrealistic I know.
will aidan sell? he got off vincent for nothing?Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz21
I think she looked at a for sale sign. Didn’t he pay Vincent a pound for it.
bargain :pQuote:
Originally Posted by kaz21
rumour has it that Kathy will be opening the Albert as a Gay Bar? is this not discriminatory?
After all can you imagine the uproar if a Hetrosexual Bar was to be opened, or a All Black or Muslim etc etc,
sorry don't agree, if she is going to open a bar, then surely it cannot be as a "GAY" bar?
Just saying
It’s confirmed she’s opening a gay bar, and heterosexual people can still go to it, there not gonna stop you.
she should get her own gaff
does she ever age
harvey affair?