Of course....:DQuote:
Originally Posted by perdita
Printable View
Of course....:DQuote:
Originally Posted by perdita
A real spoiler for you then PackermanQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Shame about Rainie, I was looking forward to seeing her again. Then again, you never know......
How many times can Sharon knock on Phil's door, three times in one episode is getting ridiculous....
She may have too many film committmentsQuote:
Originally Posted by megan999
She is ridiculous, I wish she'd stop keep patting her lad on the head , end up stunting his growth ! Lucky she hasn't got Lola's social worker on her case, the kid would be whisked off into care.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutchgirl
,,,
The key episode threads:
Lola/Lexi/Phil/Sharon: This storyline was fatally flawed by the social worker debacle, and to suggest that Phil would ever be regarded as a suitable guardian for a baby is beyond ridiculous.
Joey/Lucy/Lauren/Whitney - honestly, WHO CARES?? Fans of Grange Hill maybe?
Kat's affair: Is this still a plotline? If anyone was actually bothered, surely they're way past caring now?
Max and Tanya's wedding: Not even Max or Tanya can be arsed about this one, so why should the viewers be?
Sayed/Christian: Groundhog Day or what? We all know they're going - please let it be soon!
Conclusion: doesn't leave a lot, does it? No doubt they're building up to their most depressing Christmas episode ever - which in itself will represent an achievement (of sorts).
Excellent summary, Brucie.
surely not depressing if it means Derek goes...!!?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucie