DG some anti depressants do dull the senses,, and make them feel NUMB and emotionless,, not a good drug to be taking,,,
Printable View
DG some anti depressants do dull the senses,, and make them feel NUMB and emotionless,, not a good drug to be taking,,,
Syed is horrible to Amira :angry:
Zainab was harsh when talking about Bradley last night she is so judgemental
Yeah, Syed showed a real nasty streak last night. It's been well-hidden until now. He was estranged from his parents because he embezzled money from their business, but Marc Elliot has always portrayed him sympathetically until last night. It's interesting, although harsh on Amira, to see this side of him.
I can't believe anyone, even Zainab, is being nasty about Bradley :(
I guess Syed was angry because he only slept with Amira to reproduce.
Yep that is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruffed_lemur
Stay well clear from women who just had babies. I know I wasn't nice. But I'm surprised she get's around the house like that. Don't women in the UK get any help the first days?
What is up with Masood? Why is Dot's mail under his sofa?
I think they're repeating the resurfacing gambling addiction storyline. I unfortunately remember they did it with Ash Ferraira.
Yea only it was the son who was addicted not the father,, if i remember the Ferraira dad was a meanie !!!!!!!!!
Poor Sugar the dog. :(
Is Mas stealing the post?
I don't think so... He left his trolley unattended on Wednesday.. I bet someone nicked it and planted it in his house.. Billy and Minty was sitting there.. I reckon it was one of them.. just my guessQuote:
Originally Posted by lizann
OMG I cant stand Becca
What age is Zsa suppose to be?
Does she live with Shirley now?
Zsa has to be around 16 ish if Shirely is trying to get her into school.. she reminds me so much of my nieceQuote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
Ah could be. I think Mas is one of the nicest persons in EE. What a wrong twist if it was him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Siobhan
Why would somebody want him to be in trouble though
Well maybe he stepped with his cheerfulness on somebody's grumpy toes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Siobhan
Other people's open mail under the settee looks very damning, but I can't imagine Masood doing it either. At the same time, I can't see anyone deliberately settting him up. :hmm:
I find it hard to believe that Lucas really killed Sugar, too, even though he's obviously capable of it. Maybe he'll turn up again one day - I hope so anyway.
did you not find it strange that they showed you Lucas killing Owen and Trina but only implied that he did kill the dog.. we never saw itQuote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
Yes, I did notice that and that's why I hope Sugar may be alive. I've got a feeling that Lucas would have a harder time justifying killing an innocent creature to himself than killing Owen and Trina, both of whom had done some very bad things.
Why? Sorry - crossed with your reply to Siobhan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
I think the reason it wasn't shown maybe more to do with the fact they'd have been inundated with complaints from viewers!!!
Goes to show you how the public are that they don't complain to see another human been "killed" on TV but would kick up a fuss that an animal was "killed" on tv, especially a cat or a dogQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
I am not say either is right
I would have been more upset about Lucas being shown killing Sugar than killing Owen and Trina, though I know that's not a very PC thing to say.
MORE than 100 viewers complained this week about EastEnders serial killer Lucas Johnson bumping off collie dog Sugar - but barely any got in touch after he murdered two PEOPLE.
It was hinted on Wednesday night's show that Lucas, played by Don Gilet, killed Sugar - prompting 103 shocked fans to protest.
But when he murdered wife Trina and Owen Turner just a "handful" complained.
The viewers' backlash forced the Beeb to put out a statement saying that the show "does not condone the killing of dogs... or people".
A spokeswoman said: "Although it is never explicit that Sugar dies, the story does indeed suggest that Lucas has killed her.
"This behaviour is completely in keeping with his character."
Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...#ixzz0giNc5RTJ
Do they complain when people get murdered on other drama's? Or do dogs get better treatment than humans?
Just imagine the outrage if he'd killed a meerkat!
Can anyone please explain to me why Masood would be stealing posts.. Like how it would benefit him in any way? I don't think he did do it though.. :)
Thank-you in advance!
It would only benefit him if there was any money inside the envelopes.
But, of course, it isn't him.
Parkerman do not say things like these. And please do not mention the "M"word. People can get upset you know!Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
The reason why people like myself are outraged at cruelty to animals on TV is that it's such a problem in our society. Though we're supposedly a nation of animal lovers, cruelty to animals is very common and very rarely punished.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutchgirl
When the murder of a person is shown on a programme like EE, we accept that it is unrealistic and a rare occurrence, and that why it bothers me a lot less. Very few people would think that murder of a person is ok, and murderers that are caught are usually well punished.
Ok I respect that. In the Netherlands people have to go very far to even get punished as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
I myself thought oh no he wouldn't because Sugar is very cuddly. And dogs are not my favourite animals.
But for people to complain on such a large scale is beyond me. But animal cruelty needs to be shown as well. Even on a ridiculous storyline as Lucas'.
Can someone tell me how lucas/denise ended up with sugar in the first place,
sugar belonged to syd, then she moved to canada but i didnt think she gave the dog to them - she barely knew them as far as i can remember
Owen, Libby's dad took care of Sugar, that is why she gets obsessed with the burial site.
Looking at the omnibus edition it is now obvious that it is Billy who has stolen the post, but what does he have against Masood?
Probably nothing personal, but maybe he is looking for money etc. to pay off somebody in his old gang
I'm not someone who'd complain about it, personally, and I think EE handled Sugar's murder well (if, indeed, Lucas did kill her).Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutchgirl
As for Sugar's owners: Lucas said he'd had four owners in a year. I think Syd gave him to Dot when she emigrated, and when Owen moved in he took over his care (which is why Sugar was devoted enough to him to be obsessed with his burial site). When Owen disappeared, Jordan took him. I'm not sure if I've got that right or not.
I must admit that I haven't spotted any clues as to Masood's post. Which Billy, and what makes you think it's him?
Not that Billy. BillyMitchell.Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
Missed some of the omnibus and obviously the bit that gives you an idea about Billy Mitchell. Why has he got anything against Mas??
I can't imagine Billy being that mean. There'd have to be a good reason.
Almost right.. it was Abi who took Sugar as a favour to Bradley and she couldn't handle the dog anymore so she left him at Dot's that is when Owen took over and when he "left" Jordan took on the dogQuote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
Is it Mas's nerdy son that is stealing the post i cant think of his name?
Whitney is becoming quite annoying since she hooked up with Billie
I must say i love the Carol and Max scenes i wish Jack and Dot and Jim was also shown to be supporting Max at least Bianca called round to see how he is