Just watching the Corrie omnibus. If Kylie's 21 weeks pregnant then the baby can't be Nick's, as the dates are two weeks out. Then again, Ronnie's dates never added up in EastEnders for James to be Jack's and the writers overlooked that.
Printable View
Just watching the Corrie omnibus. If Kylie's 21 weeks pregnant then the baby can't be Nick's, as the dates are two weeks out. Then again, Ronnie's dates never added up in EastEnders for James to be Jack's and the writers overlooked that.
Yes, but dates are only an approximation...aren't they? Isn't the date worked out from the date of the last known period rather than knowing an actual conception date? You should probably know better than me!!!
....
Then again if the child is David's which of us knows the actual gestation period for a Devil ChildQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Bound to be a full moon ,wolves howling, St Ella polishing her broomstick, the birth must be close !Quote:
Originally Posted by alan45
It could be 666 days....
I thought the first episode on Friday was a bit strange compared to other episodes, the writing just didn't flow.
are the bank not looking for any mortgage repayments from stella, she did buy the pub and nick and karl are arguing one day and then friends in the bistro, the writers don't care about continuity
thank god for the hayley, sylvia and roy scenes
i wanted gail to use her mop on stella :p
are the bank not looking for any mortgage repayments from stella, she did buy the pub and nick and karl are arguing one day and then friends in the bistro, the writers don't care about continuity
thank god for the hayley, sylvia and roy scenes
i wanted gail to use her mop on stella :p
Didn't really enjoy tonight thought that it was all a little bit to predictable.