it is selfish of peggy, and im not sure why phil has agreed to do it either
Printable View
To show himself off as the hardman he is supposed to be, that is why he has agreed. But he should get tips from a Carl King up in Yorkshire on how to get away with murder first :D
Am I the only one just totally uninterested in the court case? I couldn't care less at all!
I couldn't care less about any of it tbh. The whole aftermath of Danielle dying is annoying me no end. I'm sick of the MitchellMafia and going on about "fam-er-lee". Yes Phil cos murdering someone is really good for your young son isn't it?
Janine is so obvious:rolleyes: Archie had Janine's number all right
Patrick/Theo *YAWNS*
Court case *DOUBLE YAWNS* The Brannings have been ruined so I couldn't care less about Lauren, the whole thing is unrealistic anyway.
so whats the deal when they want to kill a mitchell just hit them with a car, tiffany, jamie now danielle
Peggy! What a cow! If my mother spoke to me like that I'd bitch slap her!
Am I the only one to think killing Archie would have been OTT? Yes he's an evil ******* but he doesnt deserve to die!
Archie may be gone, but he's going to have a lasting affect on the whole Mitchell family.
:eek: :eek:
omg!!! I was soooo shocked at Peggy tonight, shes really changed!!!
And I agree, killing Archie would be very OTT
Can the writers stay off the funny stuff please? How utterly stupid. I am fast loosing patience with EastEnders. First they kill off Danielle, then we get some Mafia Moll Peggy Mitchell, who orders their son to kill someone and then rewards them with a steak dinner, without a care in the world (well except DNA, lol!) The whole thing is laughable.
Poor Phil (can't believe I just said that!!!!). I think we all know what will happen if Archie comes back. He'll cause trouble then we'll get a "Who Done it?" and it will be Roxy (least obvious choice)
Well said Bryan!
& I can't believe they had an advert put out for that.. :eek: Nothing even happened!
So whats the story with Charlie's bird Brenda?