As SoC says, the old shellac records broke quite easily, but vinyl records do not tend to break, however old they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis tanner
Printable View
As SoC says, the old shellac records broke quite easily, but vinyl records do not tend to break, however old they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis tanner
Such a shame about Shelley. Paul will be so upset.
I'm suspicious, that Darren and his Missus are up to something, surely a woman who is so materialistic is going to look at anything such as a pokey corner shop and a young kid with nothing to offer apart from the "obvious"Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Cain
Nah, not having it
As it was such an old record, is it possible it was a shellac record rather than vinyl?Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Can't argue against any of this .Quote:
Originally Posted by mysangry
I know some couples have "open" relationships but would Darren really not mind Courtney having an affair with Aadi to try to sabotage Dev's little business???? :hmm:Quote:
Originally Posted by mysangry
But he doesn't need to sabotage Dev's business unless he is not as successful as he pretends to beQuote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
Paul said he was going to the vinyl shop in Churchill Street, he also referred to it as an "album", old 78 records usual only had one song on them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
I tend to think that this story is just badly written. Although Darren may not be as successful as he says, I don't think he is are deliberately scheming to do harm to Dev in some way. I thought Darren, and maybe Courtney, might be trying to scam Dev out of his money. But now he has called of the deal, I am not sure if this was the case. Unless he is just trying to make Dev even keener for the deal to go ahead. At the end of the day is it all just an excuse for a bit of drama, and an inappropriate affair?Quote:
Originally Posted by mysangry
And so it begins, more boring s**t about bad kids, so a newby is coming to the street and along with Dylan, is going to bully Jack or something along those lines!
Is Corra trying to once again, have an agenda, that white kids are trouble, can we not just have some nice kids?
we have already had bullying stories with Seb and NIna, so why again??????????????
I did not recognize Shona tonight, she was looking so glamorous.
Should Bernie have waited until the party was over till she told Paul about Shelley?
Why can't Ed just tell that builder guy he has a problem with gambling, it would make it easier for everyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Cain
Probably because most men have a 'problem' with admitting that they have a weakness?
Who is going to put a substantial bet on a team winning 4-3 ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Cain
Poor Billy. The Bishop and his vicar chums failed to turn up at his party.
Poor Paul. He couldn't believe that a terminally ill woman had died.
However, things are looking up for Paul. He is now able to leave the flat using his chairlift while carrying his wheelchair.
Excellent summary of tonight's episode.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis tanner
As far as we are led to believed Ed has overcome his "weakness", so it would make his life easier if he admitted to Neil that he has had a problem with gambling in the past, and ask him not to keep trying to get him to have a bet.Quote:
Originally Posted by bratface
And not a Canuck murderer in sight!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis tanner
I fear you may be speaking too soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by alan45
I cannot take to Courtney the way she is being portrayed... she is a materialistic female used to finer things in life and she admitted in the beginning that she had been unfaithful before. It is unrealistic that she would want to move in with Aadi who is half her age with no money or job.... I hope this is not going to be a long storyline ....
Sadly you are correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of Cain
Although Aadi has no money and no job, moving in with him is at least a putting a roof over her head, until she finds some other mug with money. I never found her affair with Aadi totally believable, in fact I found the whole story a bit silly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
Ed should have got a trustworthy builder. Such a builder would have dug up the body and buried it very deep off site.
In Monday's episode, how did we know there was a body? What did we see exactly to indicate that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis tanner
On Monday all we saw was the site of the very shallow graveQuote:
Originally Posted by RogerOver
I went back and looked st the clip.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis tanner
We saw Ed kicking the ground with his foot. It showed 'something' only an inch below the surface, but not what it was.
Watching the clip didn't give any indication - unless I missed something?
I only know it's a grave as I saw a spoiler in the press about it.
Starting work before the sale is finalized, would that even be legal, certainly not wise. If the investors pull out because of the body on site, what then. Ed and Ron the comedy builders are going to be in a mess. Won't just be left with a hole in the ground but with a hole in their finances too.
We saw a hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerOver
Wow! Even though you've told me that, I've just looked again at that clip, I still can't make out a hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by LouiseP
All I can say is, I should have gone to Specsavers!
I think you have missed an episode. It was on last night ( Tuesday.. an extra episode because I assume that there is Rugby on Friday). No need for Specsavers.Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerOver
As Louise says, we saw a hand sticking out. Also as she says, I think you must have missed an episode as it was very clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerOver
Now about this delay to the start of building....I am still trying to get my head round why this is such a disaster for the Chuckle Brothers. Yes, it means the start of the building will be delayed and may have long-term consequences, but, even if building goes ahead straight away, they are not going to start making any money until the development is finished or near completion and they can start selling off units. The delay may not be long; they can probably make up the time. I don't see why this is such an instant hit to them. Perhaps someone in the building trade can explain this to me. Thank you.
Ah, thanks so much for the heads-up.Quote:
Originally Posted by LouiseP
I live in Thailand, so 'blindly' (ha ha) look for Mon, Wed, Fri episodes. I'll download Tuesday's now.
I assume that means there no Corro on Wednesday this week then?
The comedy builders have mentioned that the sale of the site has not been completed yet, also been mentioning investors, so I imagine something will happen that means the sale will not go ahead and/or investors will pull out, leaving them up sh?* creek without a paddle. Also they are having to pay the workers to do nothing to keep them on board.Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Apart from that this is a Soap which means "The Laws of the Universe" will not allow them to succeed. I am not in the building trade, this is just conjecture.
Yes there is but not on Friday. Check though .Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerOver
Is Stephen moving back into Eileen's flat? Thought it was to be sold???
tim said he had to move out as elaine selling so i assume to the pub with jennyQuote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
What's with this 'yeah, no' stuff, it is being said in Emmerdale too.
Carla - "Hey, nice trip?"
Stephen - "Yeah yeah, no, it was fine, thanks".
What is he saying 'no' to?
Because he's full of Bulls*it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snagglepus
He's lucky that the aide of CID and Silent Bob are in charge of the murder case.
He's obviously a fan of Jim in the Vicar of DibleyQuote:
Originally Posted by Snagglepus
Yet again no archdeaconing witnessed.