Oh no she isn'tQuote:
Originally Posted by alan45
Printable View
Oh no she isn'tQuote:
Originally Posted by alan45
Your right.Quote:
Originally Posted by soapyclean
I know what you mean!! Im sure someone dosen't get it that bad!! The poor gal!!
ee are so stupid,why kill of one of there most popular characters?
i don't think they had that choice.. Nigel wanted to leave for goodQuote:
Originally Posted by chance
Letitia doesn't do panto each year - that's a myth invented by those online who seem to dislike her. She did panto last year for the first time in several years. She isn't doing it this year. It isn't her fault that the writers always choose to write her out over the Xmas period.
If you have to keep going on about panto you should use Steve McFadden as a better example. He does it every year, including last year & will be off again in a few weeks for another panto skint. Leslie Grantham also did them.
And who can blame the actors if they want to do panto & are allowed to ? It must be a welcome change from the endless misery & tragedy that they have to act - especially in the case of Sharon whose life is a series of tragedies.
i know it a nightmare with Danny being killied it a nightmare there might as well land a plane on the street it would be betterQuote:
how many is it now?? Andy and Den on the same night and then Nanny and Dennis within a week of each other... 3 murders in one year and it looks like 2 will involve Johnny Allen
Errr I dont think the writers are the ones who make the choice :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloe05
I don't get why she likes doing panto so much anyway.
Its an improvement on EE and a great addition to her CV :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Birks_2k4
And a pregnancy one, well going into the newyear as well. Sharon, Honey, and we are yet to hear about Ruby, but I don't think she will be.Quote:
Originally Posted by the_watts_rule
Its certainly a change from her usually workload I should imagine its a welcome break tooQuote:
Originally Posted by alan45
Yes I can imagine 7 performances a week plus a Saturday Matinee :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by squillyfer
And anyway, Why would characthers keep on having on screen depatures when the actors have other roles such as panto, babies and other parts. Why could they not stay in the streets off screen. I don't know why they wrote off Kat and Mo when Jessie and Kacey had their babies. At least, They could have stayed at their homes off screen rather than take a long holiday while the actors were on mantarily leave.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chloe05
Yeah, I think it's silly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Owen
i read today in a magazine that sharon (before leaving) has another surprise instore, i wonder if this could be that she is pregnant, i know she's infertile but anything can happen in soaps cant it? also my friend told me the other day that she is allready pregnant and finds out after dennis dies but still leaves for the states. This would be a bitter sweet end to the storyline. The good news: a shannis baby, the bad news: Dennis dies :(
Yeah, thats true. You often find that characters disappear off and aren't seen for weeks. Then, they reappear again with tans. I don't see why they couldn't have just done that for Jessie and Kacey. It would be more realistic anyway!Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Owen
not sure.........but this is soapland!!!!
anything can and does happen!!!!!
I know but i thought soaps were meant to affect real life :rolleyes: and imo if Sharon discovers she is pregnant it would be pretty inaccurate.
Hmm, sounds a bit unlikely, so sounds just like something Eastenders wouold come up with.
The pregnancy rumour has already been posted in rumour mill.
I know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrie Bradshaw
:hmm:
That's alot of pregnancies at the same time.Quote:
Originally Posted by littlemo
If she is is would be good.
Hopefully when she returns she may have a happier time :) but i hear letitia takes long breaks because she has some kind of illness is this true? :confused:
I didn' hear that. So i couldn't tell you if it was true or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by daveywavey
sorry never saw it had allready been posted.
i think its been posted about 5 times lol :)
i hope she is pregnant cus she deserves some happiness. i think her relationship with dennis and her marriage to dennis were the best things that ever happened to her, so with dennis dying, where do you think she'll be? Eastenders Answer: a baby o_O
Well i heard this on digital spy. I may be wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveywavey
yeah i was reading that over there as well
Not that many, maybe three. I hope she is pregnant too, but I don't think she is.
Yay it's been confirmed!! Omg she's going to be sooooo happy!! :D
Im so upset abotu Dennis dying though!! What a shame :( xx
It's been confirmed so this can be closed? :)
I won't be too keen on this storyline as like i said, it would be pretty inaccurate as they said she couldn't have children :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveywavey
yeh but there are cases like this in like 'real-life' and things do happen women do get pregnant even if they have been told they can't!
I think it'll be a fab storyline, just couz i have waited for sharon to have a baby for a long time! xxx
i hope sharons pregnat but it seems unlikely but this is walford where anything can happen but it would be sad if sharon told dennis they where having a baby then a coupel of hours she finds out that hes dead :(
The way I've heard it, he dies and then she finds out she's pregnant.Quote:
Originally Posted by sheilamarie
Obviously Someone had it in for HER
Yeah, Johnny Allen.