:o :o :o ...............Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Wolf
Printable View
:o :o :o ...............Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Wolf
i have a question: was it just me or did the pic of ronnie in danielles locket look older than a girl of 14? cos if it was of an older ronnie (say 20ish) wouldnt that mean someone had been keeping in touch with danielles adopted parents, maybe archie?
Yes the picture definately wasn't of a 14 year old Ronnie.Quote:
Originally Posted by di marco
Archie wouldn't tell her adoptive parents that Ronnie was living in Walford though surely as he wouldn't want the two of them to meet up. So how did Danielle just happen to turn up in the right place? Archie didn't want Ronnie going to the school reunion or to read that letter from Joel - why? Does Joel know the truth about Danielle?
It's all a bit confusing to me but I think Roxy may have something to do with it all!
So Danielle knows Ronnie is her mother ???????
She should do, if she can't tell from the photograph in her locket that Ronnie is that person, she must be very stupid. Unless she thinks the person in that photo is somebody other than her mother? :hmm:Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
yh she does know she is her mum, which is why she is so upset about the way that ronnie is treating her
and about the picture being an older ronnie, which it is, as it certainly isnt a pic of sam when she was 14, its more recent than that, its on the net somewhere aswell, i dont think that means that someone has been in touch with her, i think its just they didnt put a younger pic of her, maybe so that viewers would recognise that it was ronnie, and so that it is more obvious why danielle would recognise her, as if they actually had one of ronnie at 14, she probably wouldnt be recogniseable (not that sams changed much lol) so people would wonder how can danielle tell from the pic
also danielles adopted mother died, which is why danielle then started looking for ronnie, though the adoption agency and had found out that ronnie had been looking for her, which im guessing they then told her where ronnie is
i also dont think joel knows anything to do with ronnie, as when lee was talking to them he still thought that ronnie had the kid with her
and i dont think ronnie knows anything, as if she did, would she still think the same of archie
this is answers to joannes post by the way, but i forgot to quote lol
and i think archie knows too because he said to danielle in the club who's been a naughty girl
Poor Ronnie and also poor Danielle
I think Danielle came to Walford to get to know her birth mother and its not working out good for her. Stacey isnt helping much and she can be a right cow sometimes :angry:
I must prefer Ronnie/Jack than Tanya/Jack
I think Tanya is wrong for selling the house and moving to France to have a peaceful life with her fella, her kids should be her top priority. She should tell them and also her ex Max. The writers are ruining Tanya's character.
I kinda felt that Jack was happy the sold sign was gone up.
BTW are Tanya and Max divorced yet?
Jack still has feelings for Ronnie
I'm liking the relationship between Billy and Jay
Roxy was funny :lol:
Tanya and Max are not divorced yet. I imagine with three kids, it should be a while before any decree is issued as I would think that Max will want at least shared custody, if not total custody of the children.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
It is nice to see the relationship between Billy and Jay, I just hope that the scriptwriters leave them be this way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
Not much chance of that I should think. This is Eastenders we're talking about!