Printable View
The problem is that the public all have their own minds,and we all like different charectors,i don't think these 2 leaving will affect EE much cos they havn't had time to become established yet,2 years down the line most people will say jake and danny who.
Does that mean Alfie will not be getting in to trouble once they leave?
but they were brought in as part of alfie' s family as a way to take him in a new direction, if they go there will just be him and nana moon in that big house alone, they allow other characters to develop besides there own
I hope that doesn't mean the end for Nana and Alfie.
Jake and Danny aren't the worst characters in the show. I have enjoyed watching EE lately because of them. Danny is very funny and Jake is great especially now he is hooking up with Chrissie. Get rid of Ian, Pauline, Martin and Sonia.
It is confirmed it is on the BBC Eastenders website that they leave in the summer in an explosive storyline but have the option of returning.
boo!
I'm really not sure what the bosses are up to - it had better be good. I'm really sad to see Jake go. I felt for the first time in ages that the potential with him and Chrissie could be something really special and that EE could be on the up becaues of these two. They must be mad to get rid of him !!!
why on earth are Eastenders Axing them have they completly lost the plot again? they can't keep axing Characters cause it is not the way forward they should keep Jake and Danny in it
Thats all EE does, just keep on axing characters :rolleyes: hasn't the former Kathleen Hutchison axed enough people already...
It been confirmed by ee
Is this true? - where or where are the prize winning scriptwriters of old? bring back the winners, what on earth is going on with East Enders, the producers need a good kick. Instead of changing the cast all the time sit down and write some good story lines for the characters already there. Has anyone ever thought of including some of the old regular stall holders in the plot, is it only the main charaters who talk to each other and look after their stalls, how about including the flower lady etc.
Look how long it took the ferrerias to go....... Jake and Danny have been a hell of a lot better than them and it's taken the 2 years to depart not 2 months! (ok I know they have been in a tiny bit longer than 2 months). I understand what they are saying with the gangster stuff so why not knock it on the head now and dont bring anymore new gangster roles in just leave it to whoever is there now.
Suppose they dont want them now Phil "the whisperer who gets out of breath when talking" Mitchell is coming back.............. I think they are better talent than him!
i have just read this on a celeb gossip site and thought it was rubbish so logged onto eastenders site and it is on there!! i cant believe it. i love the characters of jake and danny and really thought they were going to be in it for a while and get some good stoies!!. think eastenders have made a bit mistake axing these two
Lets get a petition going "SAVE THE MOON BROTHERS!" :D
as usual Eastenders don't care about what the fans want?
But what you've got to realise is that Eastenders is under new management. They obviously weren't working and I have to agree as many others do. Neither can act at all and just don't fit. The Mitchells will be back, where do they fit? IMO they should never have been introduced and I can see why KH was sacked if these were her ideas coming into EE. They only appealed to girls between the age of 12-18 and nobody else. Good looking they be but credible actors they ain't!Quote:
Originally Posted by dddMac1
Sounds like Excuses to me....Quote:
Originally Posted by www.bbc.co.uk/eastenders
I don't no if this is why but, EE are Losing rating and maybe they think that the moon brothers leaving will help boost them, well I’ve got news for ya, It WON'T, and Jake and Danny aren’t exactly gangsters are they? And what do they mean to many? There is hardly any? . I’m so sad, the moon brothers have only just joined, and they are so fab, Jake is just lovely and him and Chrissie have/had (not sure which one to use!) real potentional and Danny brings that needed humour to the program.
I wasn't a big shannis fan but they were a great couple so when I heard Chrissie and Jake kiss, I was so excited they have real plans, they are so good together, i mean all that flirting its just great to watch!!!Just like Kat and Alfie used to be, why is that EE never let a great couple get together something always happens to spoil it, I mean I thought Chrissie and den were good together, but then she ended up killing him so that was no good.
Just 1 more thing EE have already lost (weva they were axed or leaving,)
-Paul Truman
-Andy Hunter
-Den
-Zoë
-Sam
-The moon brothers
used characters name Quicker!!
They’d just better not axe any one else or they seriously will lose thousands of viewers.
Just thoughts
Luv ya
Layne
xxx
Ps Check out mine and Joel Beckett Lover’s Joint script!!!
would it do any good to write the bbc and say 'don't send the new moons away but keep old baldy mummble mouth phil away'. does anyone think this might help? i happen to like the new Moon boys and think that Jake Maskall is a definate improvement and added joy to watch.... what a sexy man...
my point is phil was never fun to watch, 'Danny' has a smart mouth and that sweet little devil smile. phil waddles around mummbleing his lines and none of them were funny. just another sad sack ruining things for other people.
KEEP THE NEW MOONS!!!!
Oh how I do agree with all about Phil Mitchell, who wants him. he is not good looking, and as yu say gets breathlesswhen he talks, has no facial expressions and just cannot be worth the money he is being paid. He is all old hat in the past, you can't bring back the past as we saw with Den
I agree how can they get rid of Jake and bring back miserable "I only have one expression" Phil Mitchell???? Grant would be different but PHIL.....
EE needs new characters that can be built one and expanded - not old ones repeating the same storylines i.e. the usual big man revenge...........
Come on EE listen to the fans
I don't really belive the mirror sometimes but if it is true they have only been in it for 3 days
sadly its true, its on the website, i'm gutted
i totally agree , the boys are great esp. jake moon . we do not want that mitchell family back they need to go forward not backwards , save the moons i say
where do i sign ?????????????????????????????Quote:
Originally Posted by clarzie
i have already emailed the bbc - everybody needs to do this !!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by bronzemare13
that's what i said earlier, they were brought in to give alfie and nana more depth, and more family. i can't believe they are cutting them. if they have had enough of the gangster nonsense whay can't one of them decide he wants to make something of his life and enrole in college?Quote:
Originally Posted by bossbird
higher education is open to everyone no matter where you come from, there is lots they can do!!!
I like them. Maybe they can't act, but a lot of people on soaps cant act, so theyre quite qualified to be on EE. :p
ha ha ha, but true!Quote:
Originally Posted by SoapWatcher
they haven't really been given a chance, jake is jonny's right hand man, and danny is either in trouble or humping his way round the square
Theres no point emailing the BBC tjey don't actually listen to what their viewers want look how many people wanted to keep Den.
I find this very disapointing and shocking really.
I'm not a Moon fan but I liked the new energy that Jake and Danny bought to the show and feel it was it was unfair to axe them as such a early stage. I mean look at the Ferrarahs -they have been on the show for almost 2 years and yet (to me) Danny and Jake have been more appealing in the past three months than they have in 2 years. What a waste!
I also find the 'too many gangsters' excuse a bit lame. Personally, I dont see them as gangsters. Johnny and Andy yes but the new moons -no. Fair enough they have done a few errands for Johnny but I dont think they fit that criteria. I think Danny's ok but if anyone, Jake should stay. To me, he can act and I love his chemistry with Chrissie.
I think this is also a huge part of ee's problem. They focus too much on axeing than the scripts. I do think its unfair to judge the moons soley for the past three months. Thier character haven't been given a chance to develope or evolve. Since they arrived we have had a few slanging matches with Andy, Danny and Sam and thier rapport with Johnny. I also think it's too soon to judge them on thier acting too. Many characters (also depending on scripts) improve over time. If you compare Nigel Harman from his first three months to now -I think that he has much improved (feel free to disagree).
There is loads that can be developed from them. It's obvious that they are on the run from someone or something. I find Johnny and Jake's relationship a bit sinister. I'm guessing that there is a bit of history there. I got the impression that they had a few skeletons in thier closet too. I do feel it's wrong for ee to axe them so early in the year.
can some one please define what a gangster is as i'm terribly confussed, there are some many different po1eeple that have been classed as gangsters and i'm just wondering whether anyone can be a gangster or there is a type?
first there was Phil and Grant Mitchell, gangsters?
Billy Mitchell, gangster?
Den Watts, gangster?
Andy Hunter, gangster?
Johnny Allen, gangster?
Jake and Danny Moon, gangsters?
where did u go to email was it the complaints departmentQuote:
Originally Posted by bossbird
I agree there's no point writing to the bbc,i was 1 of those that complained about dens departure,but do it any way if it makes you feel better,the thing that annoys me is the bbc should listen to veiwers cos the veiwers are the ones who pay their wages,and veiwers have a right to complain,i'm not saying they'l listen but it's eorth a try.Quote:
Originally Posted by LUSHLOOKE69
I know what you mean. It seems that ee put the gangster lable on anyone these days. I suppose next they will be saying that Billy is now a gangster just because he is working for Johnny. Also Dennis Rickman who I don't define as a ganster did have some contacts with so-called gansters Andy and Dalton. I find it all quite stupid really. What was the point of introducing Johnny if they wanted to cut down on gangsters? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Angeldelight
I think EE are stupid to axe them! If they thinks that they are too many gangsters there then they could have keep Jake and Danny Moon there and keep them as good boys not gangsters they could have wrriten sstorylines about Jake and Danny Moon settling down and are no longer gangsters simple.
I think that if Jake and Danny are people's ideas of gangsters they must be watching a different show to me Johnny Allen and especially Jack Dalton are gangsters being associated or working for one does not make you a gangster and I'm disappointed in John Yorke's decision making
i totally i agree i mean we all know JY loves the Mitchells but come on what can you do with that family now that hasn't all ready been done? they WERE a great family in the time they had on the show.
you can't do any of the Mitchell bro's stroylines as Grant isn't back. Sam will be leaving in November (do we have to wait that long?), so they're will only be Phil when he get's out of prison and his mum.
with all the 'Mitchell empire' now in ruins what is left for the family? and how can they help the show that Jake and Danny can't do?
Feel free to disagree
I know what you mean bout Sam the quicker the better the Mitchells are a has been they can't do anyhting for the show that's not already been done wot they need is fresh ideas
I do not disagree at all if you ask me they are axing the wrong characters there are plently of dead wood that needs clearing but not them I really like them
EXACTLY ee needs to focus on storylines and developing the characters they all ready have, you have 2 new characters that need more exploring (JAKE AND DANNY) and instead of changing the storylines a little they're axing them with EXPLOSIVE exit lines? how is that a remedy to the violent gangster stroylines?
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR SOAP?????