I agree with what you say perdy that it's not the same home life that the older SB members had when they were growing up, but parents working and being stressed is no reason for so many parents throughout the country to let their kids just run riot in the streets and not take responsiblity for them. We have all been teenagers and when I was one and I'm sure it was they same for other members that yes we got drunk on cheap cider, yes we got into fights. But it was with our fits and feet we did the fighting not wepons and Lord help you if your parents caught you because you'd have wished you had joined the Army.
I'm going to go off topic a bit and I'm sorry but I think it is relevant. My nephew has been in care, he is 28 now but was in and out of care/foster homes between the ages of 9 and 16. While in care he was given a £250 clothing grant every three months and £10 week pocket money. I believe that so many parents are not taken the responsiblities they should be for their kids and letting them be taken away for the money.
I can understand Brooke's family feeling that National Serivce should be brought back. I know that not all young people are bad but for the ones that have been in trouble with the police a lot may be short sharp shock of army life may not be a bad idea. The government are always moaning that british jails are over-crowded. Make the criminals do their national service at army barracks, cleaning boots and cooking for free.

