Printable View
yeah i get what you mean but to be honest i think they already know and are only keeping quiet so that ek doesnt find out!! Although i have a feeling there may be a funny scene with Greg "What do you mean sara might be at grissoms?" :confused:
Although there are also suggestions that this all might be some sort of hoax to being the mcsk out in the open!! Grissom building his own miniture and sara could be "missing"????
Yeah - I think they all know about it, but with Ecklie, things would be different wouldn't they. You know what hes like and we can't have Ecklie without him being his normal "pragmatic" self lol. And as he is technically Grissom's supervisor then he'd probably want to do something about it just to get one over, although he may already have his suspicions.
So like Sara going missing is trying to lure the MCSK out in the open?! Hmm, I don't know if I like the sound of that though and I doubt Grissom would want to put her at risk like that either, especially if the MCSK did actually find her etc.
Its certainly got everyone talking this Season though hasn't it!
it has i think when im off next week im going to have to sit and watch all the episode again and see if i can pick out an clues i may have missed along the way.
Something that did pop into my head the other day was that if lady heather was the mcsk could she be killing the others with nazi references the gassing of the last victim??? (havent really thought it through though lol)
:hmm: True, although I'm more of the mind she is going to be a victim rather than be the MCSK herself....could be wayyyy off there though :lol:
:hmm:
I've just found an episode of CSI listed on IMDB, listed as still in production, called Hard Evidence with a 2007 release date. No other details along side it.
Edit: Ignore me - looks like a new CSI Game lol
*still highly excited for a new game though*
oh maybe...another thing do we know if its going to be a two parter or a 2 hour episode!!!
edit: - oh a new game (still has to finished first three lol)
No - theres been no clues on that :crying:
They are playing this so close to their chests - its so unfair!!!! :crying:
on the website i go onto (dont know if its the same as yours) but the two main people on it have seen the episode and have been told they are NOT to tell anyone about it they can only release small details about the episode but nothing major!!!!
confirmation that the mcsk has sara
this is from the guy who has seen the episode i was telling you aboutQuote:
Sara is not taking a power walk around Lake Mead, people. Unless something drastic changes in the script, the MCSK absolutely has her.
and more spoilers from them.....
Quote:
Spoiler notes:
Because there are so many questions -- I thought I'd help clarify, to the extent that I am able anyway.
Reverse Forensics
Saying nothing of Grissom's opinions on it -- for Grissom to participate in this, he would have to lie to his co-workers, use Sara as bait for a serial killer, out their relationship for no reason, and to what end? Hoping the MCSK would bite. And I'm still not sure how it would make sense. While I don't think Grissom is overly worried about he and Sara being found out, it's reasonable to assume that for now they'd rather it be kept secret, otherwise...yeah, they wouldn't be keeping it secret. Also, Grissom doesn't take kindly to Sara being used as bait, and generally reacts poorly to her being in real or perceived danger (see: Strip Strangler, Committed, and Empty Eyes).
The Press Release
I'm not going to spoil the details of the finale, but hopefully I can guide you in a more...appropriate direction. If I were analyzing the press release from an objective (i.e. unspoiled) standpoint, these are what I'd feel were reasonable conclusions based on that tiny, but oh so consuming, press release:
Sara mysteriously goes missing indicates that there is no initial explanation for her disappearance. If Grissom gets a miniature of her right off the bat, her "mysteriously goes missing" wouldn't be so mysterious. From an objective standpoint it would be reasonable to assume that she simply doesn't show up somewhere she is supposed to be -- a crime scene, the lab, etc. Whatever the reason, though, it would seem there is no initial explanation (hence the "mysteriously" goes missing).
Bridging the gap here -- a reasonable assumption if Sara is missing with no explanation is that Sara got a flat tire, she was involved in a car accident, she's following up on a lead, her cell phone is dead, she's en route, etc. Grissom isn't prone to histrionics. Although worried, he's not going to be all "Sara and I are ****ing like mad, and she's not returned to the lab from XYZ! Form a search party! Call Triple A! Bring in the Feds!" just because she's not immediately where she should be. Ya know? I mean, just no. Even if worried, there are ways to track her down without revealing the relationship. Which brings us to:
Sara and Grissom's relationship is forced out into the open indicates that something happens which raises the alarm. People seem to be falling into a sort of chicken or egg scenario about this particular aspect of the press release -- the relationship is outed because Grissom goes bat****, or the relationship is outed because something necessitates it (e.g. a miniature of her at his place, their new place, etc). So, in that regard, something about her predicament from Grissom's POV has to warrant or make absolutely necessary their relationship being revealed (hence the forced out into the the open), which means that at some point, it's going to be obvious that Sara is not power walking around Lake Mead, or hung up in the line at Starbucks waiting on her latte and cinnamon scone.
I hope this helps a little bit.