If my child had done what Ben did, I would make sure he owned up to it. But then "famerleeeee" is all that counts with the Mitchells, not consequences.
Printable View
If my child had done what Ben did, I would make sure he owned up to it. But then "famerleeeee" is all that counts with the Mitchells, not consequences.
I would say the hypnotherapist ( or whatever he is ) was pretty convincing. I doubt he can do what he says though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
Ah now that depends on what you believe sexuality to be and if it is conditioned behaviour or genetic :hmm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruffed_lemur
Has Stacey had her hair cut ?? I liked her long hair
Well it is not conditioned behaviour, that is for sure. So a hypnotherapists cannot turn around his sexuality.I think it is wrong to suggest such a thing. There are Christians (what is in a name?) who believe in Jesus and are in a marriage and have children. They pretend everything is rosy and cosy.
I am glad Ben owned up I think Lucas may have got through to him
Are Abi and Jordan a couple? She really annoys me because she seems to act way to old/mature for her age
Nice moment between Minty and Shirl.
Shame on Denise. She saw how Lucas was with Jordan. Now she doubts her on daughter.
Maybe Phil should think less about owning children but more about being a parent to them. Ian surprised me!
Im starting to like ben with this storyline, i dont think he should leave cos really he is like Phil in so many ways. He's very strong willed. Its so random with this Ryan//Stacey thing, obviously very convenient lol
The youngsters storyline a that cottage just shows how poor their acting is! not one of them are convincing exceot maybe zsa zsa or whatever shes called.
Their acting goes with the ridiculous and very boring storyline. Yawn.