Pauline Fowlers Death

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

07-01-2007, 17:34
Soaponarope

Quote:

Originally Posted by alan45

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustJodi

Honestly why on earth should FILL give a hoot or hollar about whiney ol Sonia...but again I can't figure out half of the story lines that EE has ground out the past 5 yrs,, :searchme:
How can they RE ARREST her ???,, do they have CONCRETE EVIDENCE that she had something to do with Growlers death???
For once it would be nice :rolleyes: if they had a well written story line from the EE scribblers...:rolleyes:

Very few people can figure out the last 5 years of EE

They had no evidence to arrest Sonia in the first place but hey !!! this is Walford:rolleyes:

They have no evidence that the Orange Growler was murdered but prsumably this will come after the Post Mortem

We can live in hope that the PC scribblers down Elstree way will surprise us all some day with a well written storyline

The Walford police last year had Phil Mitchell as a burglar in possesion of a firearm with plenty of witnesses yet he supposedly bribed the Metropolitan Police, Crown prosecution Service, Forensic service, the Prison Service not to mention various witnesses and gets off. Sonia gets arrested on the hearsay word of a little kiddie about the death of a person whom the police have not even established was murdered

No wonder EE is slipping down the ratings when they cannot even get it right for the departure of one of the squares longest serving charactyers:rolleyes: :mad:

Yes they did. Sonia told Martin she hit Sonia!

Ha ha ha :rotfl: :lweek:
07-01-2007, 21:13
parkerman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soaponarope

Yes they did. Sonia told Martin she hit Sonia!

Ha ha ha :rotfl: :lweek:

What? She hit herself? What for?:confused:
07-01-2007, 23:11
Kim

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustJodi

Honestly why on earth should FILL give a hoot or hollar about whiney ol Sonia...but again I can't figure out half of the story lines that EE has ground out the past 5 yrs,, :searchme:
How can they RE ARREST her ???,, do they have CONCRETE EVIDENCE that she had something to do with Growlers death???
For once it would be nice :rolleyes: if they had a well written story line from the EE scribblers...:rolleyes:

The evidence appears to be that Rebecca, a 5 year old, told Dot that she saw it. I suppose they think they can get away with it, they must think the post mortem results would be back before they would have to release her, if she was only under caution, so hey, why not add a bit of drama to the storyline? Makes up for lack of justice done to Wendy on the exit scene and the marriage, or so they probably think.
07-01-2007, 23:22
Xx-Vicky-xX

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustJodi

Honestly why on earth should FILL give a hoot or hollar about whiney ol Sonia...but again I can't figure out half of the story lines that EE has ground out the past 5 yrs,, :searchme:
How can they RE ARREST her ???,, do they have CONCRETE EVIDENCE that she had something to do with Growlers death???
For once it would be nice :rolleyes: if they had a well written story line from the EE scribblers...:rolleyes:

I am guessing Phil helps Sonia because its what Jamie would have wanted - when she was depressed after her split with Naomi and then started drinking Phil told her to pull herself together and he said that because he knew Jamie would not want to see her behaving like that so this is probably because Jamie asked Phil to look after her, however if thats not why then i don't have a clue why
08-01-2007, 10:46
parkerman

Perhaps Fick Fill finks that Sonia is a criminal mastermind having engineered the death of Pauline and he feels he ought to keep in with her as there is no knowing what else she is capable of....perhaps....er....:confused:
08-01-2007, 10:55
alan45

I'm still amazed that two Dr's certified the Growler dead she was found dead in the street for goodness sake. This should have been treated as suspicious and the Coroner informed. It amazes me how they diagnosed a brain haemorrage. Furthermore after the long overdue PM is carried out and then its established the the Growler was murdered then I hope the second funeral is not a cremation. This would be illegal, (well it would be in the real world)
Lets face it EE have not got a good record when it comes to death have they. Barry and Den (twice) being the prime examples:rolleyes:
08-01-2007, 13:02
Richie_lecturer

I am sure that you can't be arrested and taken away for questioning, in anything other than a patrol car. Yet in the omnibus yesterday, Sonia was taken away in a normal vehicle. Is that another error? :confused:
08-01-2007, 14:30
alan45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richie_lecturer

I am sure that you can't be arrested and taken away for questioning, in anything other than a patrol car. Yet in the omnibus yesterday, Sonia was taken away in a normal vehicle. Is that another error? :confused:

Surprisingly no. The CID officers do not normally arrive in liveried vehicle. True they do sometimes have uniform back-up but as long as they properly identify themselves as police officers then they can arrest someone albeit on the uncorroborated evidence of a kiddie
08-01-2007, 14:59
JustJodi

Quote:

Originally Posted by alan45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richie_lecturer

I am sure that you can't be arrested and taken away for questioning, in anything other than a patrol car. Yet in the omnibus yesterday, Sonia was taken away in a normal vehicle. Is that another error? :confused:

Surprisingly no. The CID officers do not normally arrive in liveried vehicle. True they do sometimes have uniform back-up but as long as they properly identify themselves as police officers then they can arrest someone albeit on the uncorroborated evidence of a kiddie

Thanks for telling it like it is Alan, because honestly if EE wants to grip their viewers they need to add a bit more realism to it,, I was told last night that the CID officers do not normally CUFF some one when they are taken away?? Can you shed some light on this .. its just interesting to compare American cops and the CID officers :D
08-01-2007, 16:16
alan45

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustJodi

Quote:

Originally Posted by alan45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richie_lecturer

I am sure that you can't be arrested and taken away for questioning, in anything other than a patrol car. Yet in the omnibus yesterday, Sonia was taken away in a normal vehicle. Is that another error? :confused:

Surprisingly no. The CID officers do not normally arrive in liveried vehicle. True they do sometimes have uniform back-up but as long as they properly identify themselves as police officers then they can arrest someone albeit on the uncorroborated evidence of a kiddie

Thanks for telling it like it is Alan, because honestly if EE wants to grip their viewers they need to add a bit more realism to it,, I was told last night that the CID officers do not normally CUFF some one when they are taken away?? Can you shed some light on this .. its just interesting to compare American cops and the CID officers :D

In the UK it is not the norm to handcuff suspects unless there is a real danger of them absconding or resorting to violence. There is no hard and fast rule on it and its usually left up to the common sense of the officers involved.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page