Who Do You Think Trys to Kill Max

To be honest i think if Abi saw who did it she would have told the police straight away. Even if it was her mum or her sister cos all she cares about is her dad. After everything that family has been through she still blames her mum for everything. Im sorry but if i was Tanya i would have said i'm off to France with Lauren and Oscar. Max you can have the brat. Cos thats all Max wanted anyway. Never have i seen him be nice to Lauren or actually look like he cared about her.

Im so glad that they at least tell the truth and dont hide it. Bradley told Dot "i've thought about doing that many times" and Lauren saying it would have been better if Max died. At least people dont pretend that they like him just cos hes hurt.

If Tanya is going to be banged up, maybe she can be cell mates with Chrissie LOL
She did kill ol Den.. Tanya is accused of attempted murder of her old man,, Walford wives in jail :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: for killing or trying to kill their husbands:rolleyes: :D

yeah they can start a spin off with all the wives or partners who have tried to kill or have killed their men, (Tanya, Chrissie, Lisa, Janine, - shame cindy is dead, and there is bound to be more lol)

The real bad girls

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by *-Rooney-*

yeah they can start a spin off with all the wives or partners who have tried to kill or have killed their men, (Tanya, Chrissie, Lisa, Janine, - shame cindy is dead, and there is bound to be more lol)

The real bad girls

---

It wouldn't surprise me if they did one of those BBC3 ones if it does turn out to be Tanya that did it. Like the whodunnits one that they did on halloween.

don't know if anyone has a copy but I was passing a shop today and on the cover of Soaplife there was a pic of tanya with "Innocent (not question mark) Max proves it"... i will see if it is still there on the way home or if anyone has it can they post it?

I don't really understand why Jack is so keen to get Stacey to withdraw her statement. She said she didn't know who was driving. All her evidence proves is that someone deliberately tried to kill Max and that it wasn't an accident. But, as Tanya has already confessed, what would be the result of Stacey withdrawing her evidence? Nothing as far as I can see.

Somebody help me out here. :confused: :confused: :confused:

I was thinking the same.. maybe he was hoping she was saying it was not deliberate but an accident that she try to swerve and hit him instead... I don't know... what gets me is this: if it was Lauren and not tanya, why would tanya risk losing 3 kids to protect Lauren? surely Lauren as first time offence would not be sent to jail.. she could say she didn't do it on purpose, she didn't know how to drive and it was just an accident.. that she was rebelling..

I was wondering that after watching last night's episode. Stacey too did not see who was driving, therefore no need for Jack to intimidate her. :angry:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Siobhan

I was thinking the same.. maybe he was hoping she was saying it was not deliberate but an accident that she try to swerve and hit him instead... I don't know... what gets me is this: if it was Lauren and not tanya, why would tanya risk losing 3 kids to protect Lauren? surely Lauren as first time offence would not be sent to jail.. she could say she didn't do it on purpose, she didn't know how to drive and it was just an accident.. that she was rebelling..

---

Yes, agreed. But I'm still really unhappy about the thought that it could be Lauren - who, as far as we know, has never had a driving lesson in her life. I just can't believe it could possibly be her.

Perhaps it turns out to be Nick Cotton....:)

Perhaps Jack is involved in some way and thinks that Stacey could say something incriminating against him? I don't believe for a second though that Tanya would cover for Jack.

It gets more confusing each episode!