Neighbours (Aus) Spoilers 2nd - 6th November 2015

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lizann

has brad made a move on susan yet or is she too old to spawn another sprog for him

he needs his man card revoked

id love beth and ned to show up

---

Susan did act as a surrogate for Libby a few years back - so you never know what might happen !!!!!!!!

Dupe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by indigodance

Susan did act as a surrogate for Libby a few years back - so you never know what might happen !!!!!!!!

---

I hated that story. Seemed very selfish of Libby, and she already had a son too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lizann

if brad isn't guilty and didn't feel bad about his actions in the fire then why not tell his kids

---

Because Terese made him feel guilty, even though he isn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dazzle

Memory is a very unreliable thing. It's very well known that no two people will remember an event exactly the same - even a very important event (which a soap storyline most definitely isn't).

It's pretty insulting to keep repeating that people are making up stories (in other words lying) about their perception of what happened. I'm team Terese, but I take a pretty moderate view of Lauren and Brad's behaviour: putting it down to selfishness not malice. However, I accept that posters who disagree with me have different perceptions and memories of what occurred (and that our memories are coloured by our own experiences).

---

Preach! When we remember something, we're not actually recalling the event, we're remembering the last time we remembered (if that makes sense) so you're not actually remembering doing something or watching something. So it's understandable (as pointed out by Dazzle) that some people (probably myself included) have totally different recollections of the events. There's 3 sides to every story. One persons, the other persons and the truth.
I really wish you would stop saying people are making things up. Chances are everyones recollections of the storyline have swayed off course big time. Doesn't mean anyone has set out to lie about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by indigodance

Susan did act as a surrogate for Libby a few years back - so you never know what might happen !!!!!!!!

---

Oh my god I forgot about that! Haha!
OH God, could you imagine? Brad and Lauren want a kid, but Lauren isn't able to carry a child because Paige sold Lauren's womb to Dimato (totally a thing) so they ask Susan to be the surrogate?
Of course, Brad and Lauren would "totally understand" why Paige did what she did as she can never do anything wrong.
Sorry, I like to make up ridiculous storylines to amuse myself :p

how is neighbours not the no. 1 soap, the discussion it is generating even more than killer bobby from esstenders

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lizann

if brad isn't guilty and didn't feel bad about his actions in the fire then why not tell his kids

---

He feels guilty but that doesn't necessarily mean he did anything wrong. It might be that he feels bad that Lauren was his first concern, even though he did everything he could for Terese. It might also be something akin to survivor's guilt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LauBuch

Chances are everyones recollections of the storyline have swayed off course big time. Doesn't mean anyone has set out to lie about it.

---

You've said more eloquently in two sentences what it took me two paragraphs to say! :D

an even more scary thought ...... Sheila could surrogate Brads next sprog from spawn .... apart from the Brannings old man she been a bit left on the shelf man wise, Lou and Harold did a runner (although she did have the hots for Paul no long ago)...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ruffed_lemur

Because Terese made him feel guilty, even though he isn't.

---

Terese wasn't aware of the true situation, she only woke up when Brad was carrying Lauren out and was gone when he came back for her, so her perception was that he had rescued Lauren and left her for dead. She seems to understand now, though.