sean did nothing too at the accident and antony's acting is very bad
kirk moving sinead cant have helped her spine but if he didn't she would be dead at the end of the cliff
Printable View
sean did nothing too at the accident and antony's acting is very bad
kirk moving sinead cant have helped her spine but if he didn't she would be dead at the end of the cliff
It really did show Sean's bad acting!
There was Maddy, Julie and Tracy that were alright in a crisis the rest weren't up to much.
Nice touches in the scenes between Maddy and Sally as well.
tim afraid of the rat and with craig was funny and michelle has gone back to her annoying self again
To be fair, Alya was bleeding from her head! And Sean did stay with her, which doesn't seem particularly heroic, but is important in a situation like that. Not everyone can be dragging people out of perilous situations and some people are scared. Everyone reacts differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy
To be fair, Alya was bleeding from her head! And Sean did stay with her, which doesn't seem particularly heroic, but is important in a situation like that. Not everyone can be dragging people out of perilous situations and some people are scared. Everyone reacts differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy
Why is Michelle telling everyone about Steve's condition?
kind answer- hopes it will make peopleQuote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
understand why he has been behaving
as he has and they will be less crtical of him.
not so kind answer- has to be centre of
everything even if only by proxy.
I know a lot of posters hope the "improvement"
in her behaviour to Steve will continue.
It would be nice if it did but Im not sure that
people do change when their behaviour has
been consistent for so long.
Also it possible to believe in some soap
relationships but others like(Steve andMichelle)
to me are what I think of as "cut and paste"
Just put together because SWs didnt know
what else to do with them.
But the plan seems to be for them to
continue together for the foreseeable!!
dupl
To be fair to her, she was trying to defend Steve against the mutterings in the pub, especially Norris's very unkind and unwarranted remarks.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
She could bar him from the pub and tell him to f off and mind his own businessQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Can you imagine someone saying f off in Coronation Street? How many telephone calls, emails and letters of protest do you think they would receive? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
Norris has always been a bit of a gossipyQuote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
oddity but there was some humour with it.
Recently he does seem.to have become
much more unpleasant and without the
humour. And not just about/to Steve!!
dupl
Norris soon lost interest in the telescope then...
And his iPad
I think his Ipad might be featuring inQuote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
a story connected to Maddie( per spoilers)
dupl
i'd love itQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
i'd love itQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
There were some funny lines on Monday's episodes. David calling Michael a village idiot (very apt description lol), David (again!) leaving the message that Gail was dead, then Audrey saying at least it was quick! :D
I was watching a recording so when Michelle was about to spill Steve's secrets to the whole pub I fast forwarded the scene as I couldn't bear to watch. I think it's unforgivable to tell someone's medical problems without their permission, especially to a room full of onlookers.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
If she wanted to defend him why not tell the truth - that the accident was caused by the joyriders?
Quote from post by Dazzle** was watching a recording so when Michelle was about to spill Steve's secrets to the whole pub I fast forwarded the scene as I couldn't bear to watch. I think it's unforgivable to tell someone's medical problems without their permission, especially to a room full of onlookers.
If she wanted to defend him why not tell the truth - that the accident was caused by the joyriders?[/QUOTE]**
REPLY
Although I dont like the character -I did give
her the benefit of the doubt- hoping she intended
to help Steve.
But sometimes giving info abt illness or other
private matters to a lot of people loudly can
just make matters worse rather than help.
Some people will understand and it may
8improve their behaviour.
Others who have closed minds or a prejudice
on the subject will just have their opinions
re-inforced and be given more ammo.
We know there were such people present in
the pub.
I suppose if you want to help someone you
have to do it in a way that is acceptable to
them.!
I can only say I wouldnt want my details
blurted out in a crowded pub-if I was in
Steves position.
re " joyriders". They probably werent mentioned
as it would stop one strand of story in its tracks
and reduce the drama!
dupl
Yes, I agree. That line from Audrey was an absolute classic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzle
There we have it .. David never got round to adopting Max officially ...
I am glad it was mentioned on screenQuote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
I had to laugh at Gail and Michael talking about all her marriage surnames and the wedding, sometimes they are funny as a couple
...
Yes, her next wedding at the Registry Office will be half price :lol:
Tony and Tracy :sick:
And Callum is on Max's birth certificate, so David has to go and get residency order for Max ... hopefully he will be successful, I think he definitely will make a better Dad to Max than Callum
Noticed Catherine Tyldesley's baby bump today in several shots, wonder how she will be written out of the show for her maternity leave ...could be because of Todd's meddling and winding Jason up .. successfully and she leaves to join Mum in Spain ...
Yes David is a good dad to MaxQuote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
I think Callum's interest in Max is more to get at David than genuine interest and care
yeap i think you may be right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
I thought the father had to be present at the brith registration for hsi name to be on the certificate?Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdita
didnt Tyrone have that problem when Kirsty wentto register Ruby without him??
Kylie said Calum dropped her when he found out she was pregnant so wouldnt have gone with her to register the birth!!??
No, the father doesn't have to be present. One or other parent can register the birth, the other does not need to be there.
I will bow to your knowledge,Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
I thought however that if a couple were not married, the mother couldnt put a fathers name in his absence to prevent false paternity claims?
or am I out of date? (which in middle age is most likely!!!)
Yes, sorry, sarah, you are partly right. I was thinking of married parents.
With unmarried parents, the mother can register the birth alone but she would have to take a signed statement from the father along declaring he is the father.
...................
Dont know if there are any checks of fathersQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
identity or signature before declaration accepted
If not a potential.loophole for dishonesty and
for the SWs!
Think one custody issue is sorted re Max and
anr pops up.
Kim found a clip which dependent on
whether you read it as present tense or
future could mean David had adopted
Max or he hasnt.
In the clip David says "the adoption stuff
has come thru for Max " which most
would read as an application already made
and now approved.
But in a recent episode( that Ive not seen
yet) its said that David hasnt adopted Max.
So now we are supposed to think the
"adoption stuff "that David recd was an
application form that wasnt completed??
Actress playing Kylie has only quite recently
gone on Maternity Leave -so they have anr
9?? months to cover the storyline before
she returns - when it seems expected she will
be back with David.
dupl
Yes-and I don't blame her, Jason is so stupid!Quote:
Originally Posted by flappinfanny
Yes-and I don't blame her, Jason is so stupid!Quote:
Originally Posted by flappinfanny