I think Michael Moon's exit will be coming soon maybe he kidnaps Scarlett and leaves with the baby
Printable View
I think Michael Moon's exit will be coming soon maybe he kidnaps Scarlett and leaves with the baby
Maybe. Actually his exit only makes things worse. He's about the only interesting character left in EE.
I agree he is a great characterQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Sick of the Lola/Lexi/Phil thing, been dragged out way too long, and as for Kirstie pretending she is pregnant, haven't they already done that storyline with Zoe and Dennis! Talk about running out of ideas! :-(
I take it none of the EE scriptwriters have children. Roxy comes downstairs and says to Alfie that Amy is watching TV so she (Roxy) can spend time with him. Anyone who's had kids would know it is not quite as simple as that.....!
I do that all the time it is so easy! Oh wait, no I don't cause either a) the kids kill each other or b) find new and interesting ways to destroy thingsQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Or paint their little brothers blue (from top to bottom, including PJ's) , when mummy was trying to have a wee lie in after her FIRST night out in about four years!
Amazing how all the children disappear when there is a celebration in the Vic, all the adults are there, so whose looking after all the kids?
Amazing how all the children disappear when there is a celebration in the Vic, all the adults are there, so whose looking after all the kids?
Amazing how all the children disappear when there is a celebration in the Vic, all the adults are there, so whose looking after all the kids?
Amazing how all the children disappear when there is a celebration in the Vic, all the adults are there, so whose looking after all the kids?
You obviously feel very strongly about that, jules!
My nights over the years when the kids were younger were very few, so yeah I always think whose got the kids ... as all the people any of them would trust are in pub/club with them lol
you can see a young cindy in lucy. :)
mary poppins :DQuote:
Originally Posted by jules29
I think you missed my point, jules!Quote:
Originally Posted by jules29
.......................................
she needs a good meal inside her though!!Quote:
Originally Posted by flappinfanny
they say never trust a thin chef -got to be the same for a thin cafe owner????
the old ian beale is back
Finding the cash box so quickly and easily particularly after the workmen had been in there was stretching it a bit. Isn't the money part of Dereks' counterfeit stash?
Eastenders missed a real opportunity last night. They could have hired Karl from Corrie to set fire to Phil's house while he, Sharon, Lola, Billy, Alfie and Roxy were all inside and put all of them and especially us out of our misery.
So Trish visits Phil at night, has he another lady on the go :p
Just another totally ridiculous turn of events in the social worker story. As if any social worker would come round for dinner at the family of a client....aaarrrggghhh!!!
Again, Kim and Denise performance priceless.
I like Sharon's hair cut
Did Sharon feed Denny at all the other night?
.
I think that Sam is a good addition to the cast, and makes Ava more interesting. Dexter's acting is getting better. I like Sharon's new haircut too :)
Looks like Sharon is well and truly BUSTED... and Lola can not be blamed for telling Phil about this incident ( black out from the pills )curious to see how this all pans out now that the pill incident has been exposed of course Sharon will probably try to cover her **** and say it was a one off thing and she can stop any time..( rolling my eyes ) Was it just me but did any of you see the point of Sharon going to Jack the way she did ???? I mean was it neccessary ????? As for Sharon's hair,, the hairdresser should have done a better job hiding the extensions :-P
I also like Sam..I also was waiting to see if Sam would ask Cora what it had to do with her,,it would have floored him good if he found out Cora was Ava's biological mom and Dexter's gramma .. should have some interesting scenes coming our way :-)
Jack is walking around the Square like a spare useless tool
Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
I agree,, he was also checking out all the "land marks" he remembered..hes not going to be around much longer ...
So what did ya'll think of the Sharon and Phil debacle ?? Wonder where she will end up ??? Begging Jack to take her back ??? Or go to Billy's and stay there ??? I mean who would take her in besides Tanya ?????
strange when she was thrown out, Sharon's first shout was 'where will I go?' and not 'where is my son?'..........
Sleeping in the club perhapsQuote:
Originally Posted by JustJodi
I was thinking the same thing ,,, Phil could try to take custody of Denny,,, since this is EE any thing is possible .... I was also waiting for Phil to say something like Rhett Butler said in Gone with the Wind "Frankly my dear I don't give a DAm n " LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by sarah c
I think all the viewers don't give a damn about Sharon or even Phil for that matter
Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
I think bringing back Sharon has not done EE any favours,, then pairing her up with her old lover is not a good move either,, but then again EE is scraping the bottom of the barrel...
Please please please please please let that be an end to the Lola/Lexi/Phil nonsense. It went out in a blaze of glory with a typically totally unrealistic and ridiculous ending last night.Let's not have any more. Please please please please please......
so who won in the end?
I don't think it is unusual these days for soap characters to be brought back only to see them ruined. Sharon, Kat and Alfie.. I'm sure the list goes on. Sunita is a good example from Corrie.
I haven't watched for a while and I can't say I'm missing it.
Kat probably. They didn't see eye to eye in 2005 but the writers seem to have forgotten about anything that far back. It wasn't even six months ago that no one wanted anything to do with Kat after how she treated Alfie.Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJodi