that dexter fella is annoying me already
Printable View
that dexter fella is annoying me already
how sick and weird was it hearing phil saying daddy phil to lexi
I thought I had misheard that, thought maybe he said granddaddy Phil, glad you heard the same; sick and weird, you are right
That was disturbingQuote:
Originally Posted by lizann
When is Lola suppose to get custody back as I thought Phil had interim custody and now he isnt in a relationship with Sharon why has he kept Lexi?
Phil is disturbing......!
and why do EE men have to 'whisper' when they are doing 'tough man' or 'emotion'...?
thank God the women dont do it otherwise I'd have to have the volume up!!
I find it hard to understand what Joey is saying sometimes. Good thing I can lip read!Quote:
Originally Posted by sarah c
It's just so unbelievable that Phil would get custody. I just don't get it.
This is Eastenders, Katy. It exists in a parallel dimension to the rest of the world.
what gets me in all soaps is that we are taken to be thick fools who will believe these outrageous stories. I find it insulting that I am meant to think Phil would get custody.Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Gievn the speed with which Lexi was taken away from Lola - why would she be released into the care of an ex-con, ex-alcoholic, ex-druggie with the ease of handing over a kitten?
(in fact getting to home a kitten may even take longer??!!)
I'm not excusing the stupidness of the storyline at all, but does anyone else keep forgetting that Phil is Lexi's grandfather? Can't wait til the inevitable day when Ben comes back with a third head!
he dont have to say anything he is grand to look at :pQuote:
Originally Posted by megan999
anyone else think ava will be next for a romance maybe with phil
he dont have to say anything he is grand to look at :pQuote:
Originally Posted by megan999
anyone else think ava will be next for a romance maybe with phil
Tanya seems to forget she took Max from his first wife Rachel and didnt think about his son Bradley at that time, she really has become a pathetic character
Loved Kirsty's line to Phil after his asked her out
When is Kat going to open up about why she went with Derek, seems to be now forgotten by her and the writers, an explanation would be nice for the viewers
.
So sick of the Max and Tanya storyline already
im going to miss jo joyner. a very good actor.
But the writers have ruined the character imo same with KatQuote:
Originally Posted by flappinfanny
I agree tammy. Sadly that's what Eastenders does best!
true, but she can only work with the material she is given.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
Of course, Jo Joyner is excellent. What tammy and I are complaining about is what the scriptwriters have done to Tanya's character. No-one is complaining about Jo.Quote:
Originally Posted by flappinfanny
Of course, Jo Joyner is excellent. What tammy and I are complaining about is what the scriptwriters have done to Tanya's character. No-one is complaining about Jo.Quote:
Originally Posted by flappinfanny
Last night, Dot said her benefits had been stopped because she was in rent arrears. Another fine example of Eastenders not being in the same United Kingdom as the rest of us!
As Dot is a pensioner with her husband in care wouldnt she get help from the state?Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Yes, but not in Walford.
That is cause everyone can get a job in Walford.. there is no need for pension or benefits. You work til your drop dead or are murdered in a christmas specialQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
are lauren and joey a couple now?
yes Dot finding them on the sofa 'outed' them.....Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
jack should kick out sharon instead of max
whitney looked very orange at the start of tonight's episode
poor aj coughed up for a bottle of wine for bianca and she leaves him out in the cold :p funny though
jack should kick out sharon instead of max
whitney looked very orange at the start of tonight's episode
poor aj coughed up for a bottle of wine for bianca and she leaves him out in the cold :p funny though
Yet another great example of Walford not being in the United Kingdom last night. Alfie "surprises" Roxy with a sign showing she is now joint licensee of the Queen Vic. Never mind the fact that she would have had to apply herself, get herself registered, sign various documents etc., none of which can be done "on your behalf" by someone else.
Also, if Bianca is so broke, why does she spend most of the day in the cafe? Wouldn't it be cheaper to have tea or coffee at home?
Yet another great example of Walford not being in the United Kingdom last night. Alfie "surprises" Roxy with a sign showing she is now joint licensee of the Queen Vic. Never mind the fact that she would have had to apply herself, get herself registered, sign various documents etc., none of which can be done "on your behalf" by someone else.
Also, if Bianca is so broke, why does she spend most of the day in the cafe? Wouldn't it be cheaper to have tea or coffee at home?
would Alfie get a licence so easily himself with a criminal record?Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
and Kat had one too, I thought the reason Phil wasnt licensee at any point in the history of him owning it was his record?
If an applicant for a Personal Licence has unspent˜relevant offences' or ˜foreign offences', the licensing authority can grant the licence only after having consulted the local police. If the police then object on the grounds that the ˜Crime Reduction' objective of the Licensing Act would be undermined by granting the application, then the application must be refused. The applicant can appeal the refusal and this will require a hearing. In practical terms, if an applicant has an unspent offence the police will object and in most cases the licence will end up not being granted. An offence is ˜spent' after a period of time, 5, 7 or 10 years depending on seriousness. Offences which are never˜spent' are those where the offender was sentenced to 32 months in prison or more.
The police would certainly object to Phil having a licence. Maybe Alfie would get away with it. However, you have brought up another point. Alfie doesn't own the Vic, it's not up to him to make Roxy a licensee, even if he could.
I am assuming with all this that Roxy had already passed her Personal Licence exam as I believe she did have a licence once before. Nevertheless, that wouldn't mean she wouldn't have to go through the whole process again. Alfie can't just make her a licensee.
You don't want to read that again, interesting and informative as it was!
Didnt Phil also make Roxy manager so she is Alfie's boss no?
I hate how Alfie is always helping Kat he needs a clean break from her
Yes, I believe so.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
Yes, I believe so.Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
See, I feel so strongly about it, I even believe it twice!
Why didnt Phil take Lola with him to meet Peggy in Cornwall and why the hell didnt Peggy come back for Pat's funeral if she is in Cornwall?
I could rant all day about Eastenders
The plots of EastEnders come from another planet, but that's why I like watching it, to get away from real life for half an hour. I just suspend belief and enjoy the (mostly) good acting!:angel:And when I can't understand the plot, I just post on this excellent forum :thumbsup:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tammyy2j
because Phil isnt interested in Lola - lexi is Phil's baby now!!
and i thought peggy had gone to Portugal to be with Grant?