Same I didn?t know whether he was talking about Shirley or not.
Printable View
Same I didn?t know whether he was talking about Shirley or not.
katy is manipulating mick to thinking shirley is the main villain
Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
She always has been.
This is ridiculous, Sharon is manipulating Ian now. She's made it plain a few times that she's not interested in Ian, but now he's saying that he has to sell the pub, and I can see that he will with the situation that he's in, suddenly "I'll be by your side", what till Phil decides to nod his bald head in her direction again?
And sorry, I just can't buy the Panessars as the Asian Krays, it doesn't seem convincing.
Max also has a cheek with the way he reacted to Jack.
What I did find funny was Rainie and Stuart with Tiffany at the beginning and Stuart's reaction to Rainie being way over the top. He really should have added the line "I'm eating" which might have seemed a bit cliche but would be understandable.
Just sell it Beale. You don't need her premission.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadefalcon
sharon could buy the pub with her divorce settlement from phil
That?s what I thought she was gonna say to Ian. To just hang on a bit and she would buy him out or partner with him.
Why did Sharon have Max's bank details on her laptop?
Doesn't everyone in soapland? Same as mobile phone numbers and passcodes??? :o :hmm:Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
However, she expects Ian to fund her. It was laughable as well to hear her say "I'd like to see him try", when Ian said that Max would threaten to put her out. No doubt she'd go and have a word with Phil then...Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
So nice to see the moral messages in Eastenders.
Aren?t they joint on the lucy Beale foundation. So probably both have access to it.
I'm a Trustee of a charity but I certainly wouldn't give my fellow Trustees my bank account details!Quote:
Originally Posted by kaz21
yes but why there own accountsQuote:
Originally Posted by kaz21
Correct. Walford is a moral free zoneQuote:
Originally Posted by Jadefalcon
I find it very hard to see Max as the moral paragon of righteousness with the way he's acting towards Ian. Consider his history ever since he appeared, he's nearly as big a scumbag as Phil.
Why can't Max just transfer the money back to the Lucy Beale Fund?
Phil has a code and a reputation, since when? That's news to me.
Max trying to act the hard man again, along with Phil and Ben, totally unconvincing.
Alternatively, why doesn't he just pay the money to Linda?Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
I think the best outcome for this story would be that it was Max who did it, but that Bobby is found guilty and goes to prison for it.
I'm calling it now Tracy and Winston did it.
I'm calling it that either Sharon gets it or more likely the shows favourites, the Mitchells, who can do no wrong, get it.
with shrimpy helpingQuote:
Originally Posted by Timalay
linda saying max is innocent this time like he was last time but her and mick did nothing when denny said bobby did it not max, this max linda "friendship" makes no sense and why is tina trying mick the pub he sold it as linda an alcoholic
He was meant to hide the body.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
Agreed, this story that Ian 'stole' the pub is complete nonsense. It was sold fair and square.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
This happens all the time in EastEnders, someone owns the pub for a time and it's suddenly treated as a long time ancestral home m
Isn't it also funny that Ian can be arrested on one person's say so but the scum Mitchell's constantly get away with everything. And Ben has a bloody cheek 'turn on your own', the Mitchell's do that with Billy, treat him like absolute crap until they want his help then it's "remember you're a Mitchell'
Most of the ones gloating are low life's. Ben, Suki, Stacey, they're all scum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadefalcon
The problem is it is now very difficult to find anyone in Eastenders who either hasn't been convicted of some crime in the past or has recently done something illegal for which they have not yet been caught. There are more criminals and ex-cons living on the Square than there are in the nearest prison.
By my calculation, only Winston has led an entirely blameless life.
Maybe Tracey as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
Among the regular denizens, it seems to be that in my memory only really Denise and Honey seem to have been fairly decent living.
Lets look at some of the others.
Max, from the moment he appeared in the show, you got the impression from his ex, Tanya, that he had been a serial adulterer with her, in fact his marriage to her was because he was unfaithful god knows how many times to his previous wife and Tanya had been one of his later conquests. Hell, when Abi died he tried to make advances to a grieving Tanya which was pretty low even for him. He's been involved in plenty of shady crap over the years.
Phil. It would be easier to list what he's not been involved in, so that's animal molestation, witchcraft and necromancy I guess. :)
Ben, among all the other shady crap he's been involved in, he murdered Heather.
The Panesars are just here and already we're seeing them get involved, mainly Suki who is a wannabe slum landlord.
The Slaters bar Jean are pretty bad as well. Stacey lately committed fraud to a large degree, a story that seems to have been conveniently dropped, I guess crime does pay. Don't get me started on Mo's various shady deals mainly performed off screen or hinted at.
We have Gray who has committed murder and seemingly got away with it, at least for now.
Callum is involved with the Mitchells and is a crooked cop.
It's telling that in the last few episodes Rainie and Stuart seem closer to normal people than a good chunk of the square. Talking of them that has been some good scenes and dialogue with them recently. Stuart first talking to Tiffany and Keegan shows that he's not some dumb brute and could sense that they weren't entirely sure.
jean even though a slater is good
Well that is why I did say the Slaters bar Jean. She seems to be decent, but as mentioned the square is full of rogues. Hell, Ian's line on Friday was right about very few angels.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
I could not care less about Mick, Linda and Ian
I did like Stacey telling Ben do one as he ruined her marriage
I hope Callum is kicked off the police force
Sharon said that Ian had no pulse. Maybe if she couldn't find his pulse, a bit of CPR wouldn't have come amiss instead of just letting him lie there!
did sharon even check or did she attack himQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman
jack looked shocked and disgusted about linda and max
Jack should never be surprised at anything Max does. Considering Max slept with his own sons wife you can't get much lower.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
those brannings keep it in the family, maybe jack jealous max bagged her first :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Jadefalcon
Was Kush waiting outside the police station where police come and go all the time on the off chance Jack might come out?
no way should pc callum be on this investigation given he lives with boyfriend ben
Callum now appears to be one of Walford top cops .Quote:
Originally Posted by lizann
Sharon must be desperate to prevent Beale from dying before he changes his will
When did Phil and Sharon get divorced then?
quickest ever sharon must have caved to phil's greedy demands to marry ian for the pubQuote:
Originally Posted by parkerman