Just food for thought but can you name any axed characters that have returned permenantly?
Printable View
Just food for thought but can you name any axed characters that have returned permenantly?
sam mitchell? years ago
Nope I was just saying to my mate that axed characters never return but there is always a first time I guess
But that was with a different actress, not unless your talking about Daniella Westbrook returning. My memory doesn't go back that far :wall:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rach
there might be a first time,its happened in corrie and emmerdale, after public outcry there has been a storyline change
Sorry but you've lost me there!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rach
And you can always say public outcry and a first time but do masses of people really care that much? I'd of thought we would have seen the protests by now :D
the public campaighns i'm referring too are in corrie, the free dreary campaign, they got her released from prison far quicker than what they wanted too, and laurel and ashly will now wed in emmerdale after viewers protested about them not being allowed to
Ah but thats a character in jail- not leaving.
Where's the evidence about Ashley and Laurel? I've not seen it anywhere :D
And this is the BBC who refuse to budge over anything! Jerry Springer- The Opera beckons....
JSW you love having debates :mad:
They're what forums are all about and please explain why thats a bad thing?!!Quote:
Originally Posted by .:SpIcYsPy:.
the bloke who plays ashley was on lk today last weekQuote:
Originally Posted by *JSW*
Ok! For a student you have some weird taste in tv programmes! :lol:
what is wrong with gmtv?
Not GMTV but LK isn't that aimed at 35 year old mothers. I know your going to say 'i watch it for TB!' (which is a fair enough reason- soap fact researching so to speak!)
Eastenders are making no sense with their recent storylines or characters - how can they ax Jake and Danny Moon on account of them being too violent and then bring back the Mitchells? If memory serves between them Phil & Grant have beaten up just about everybody they've come in contact with and as for the "Hostage" storyline I seem to recall Phil being involved in a similar situation with Dan & Mel a few years ago? I know he's a caveman but would he really be that stupid considering how that turned out?? At least Jake & Dan are pleasing to the eye - Eastenders scriptwriters should concentrate on giving them some decent - non-violent - storylines instead of bringing back old, neanderthal characters that we were glad to see the back of. Bringing back Den might have won them some temporary decent ratings just as bringing back Den did - but instead of going for the quick fix they should improve the quality of the show, that itself will see viewers return, and stay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angeldelight
ok Phil and Grant = not gangsters :thumbsdow
Billy = not even close :rotfl:
Den = not a gangster :thumbsdow
Andy + wannabe gangster or rubbish gangster :lol:
Johnny Allen = Gangster :cheer: :bow:
Jake = Johnny's right hand man :thumbsup:
Danny = Always gets into trouble with Johnny :wall: but not a gangster
TrueQuote:
Originally Posted by Frankie
The point I think that some people have over-ridden here is all this talk of gangsters. I somehow find it highly unlikely that because there were "too many gangsters". There are bound to be more reasons behind it which we simpily don't know. There are bound to be EE politics coming in somewhere. The Gangsters reson was just a front IMO characters can be changed, some how I see other reasons behing their departure...
den watts was one !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!
i think they should keep the moon brothers too not go back to the days of the rubbish mitchells
true, i think they are dated
AndRach I agree with you as well!Quote:
Originally Posted by Rach
Simpily bringing old characters back doesn't solve problems. We're not looking for a 1998 version of EE just because we associate it with EE's better days. We've seen that era once and will bore the socks and shoes of us.
Simpily giving the Mitchell's blank cheques to return is wrong. It means that there's no money left to pay any no cast members that there might be the potential for.
Leave the Mitchell's in Brazil I say!
omg! we agree!
I'm in as much shock as you! :rotfl:
But this whole thing of wanting Sharon to come back so there could be another love triangle! Why? Its been done once? This is just one example of EE either as I said bringing the soap back to the 90s or newspaper lies!
it wouldn't be plausable now though, she has admitted that dennis is the love of her life, abd was heart broken at den's death about him,
a mitchell wouldn't even register
Ah but we know how EE can so easily switch a situation and after the last year I wouldn't put anything past them! But I don't believe this storyline anyway, it sounds false to the bones!
it would be a shame to wreck the shannis thing, thats the only reason she should come back to a future with him
they shouldnt bother with the mitchells, i agree with you on the salary thing, there will be no cash for other talent
Wreck the Shannis thing?!! :eek: I presume your referring to Dennis and Sharon! The 2 of them love each over to bits. I really don't see a 3 way affair developing excluding Dennis!
Anway back to topic and how do you see the Moon bros leaving?
i mean the only way sharon will return is for dennis, i cant see her getting involved with a mitchell, they will leave after a scam goes wrong not because of them but jonny thinks its their fault so they run
tbh, I can see Phil going off with johnny as the Moons will be leaving new right hand man mabye?
Rach, do you have any idea what reputation points are (along the top of the banner, the scales) and the little green squares?
Thanks, J
can some1 explain 2 me, r Jake and Danny Moon being AXED cos they shouldn't be they r good characters! EXPLAIN
SHAM05:)
First of all, I would like to know from what source this information comes. If it is Heat Magazine...well I rest my case. Also how do we know that the BBC wan :thumbsdow t to get away from a gangster scenario? Has anyone from the BBC actually said this? or once again has this come from some "magazine". I have yet to actually hear a BBC spokesperson say anything about anything because that would leave the way open for a genuine conversation with the fee paying public.
I would also like to agree with those Emmerdale haters, I'm definitely one of those. Can't stand the peurile and often ludicrous storylines, but acording to viewing figures that is what the public like.
Anyway who agrees with me that the Ferrerras departure last night was ridiculous, surely it could have been handled better than that.
Now that they have gone could we please have some continuity with the characters and no more comings and goings and DEFINITELY NOT THE MITCHELLS - BAN THE MITCHELLS I say.
Yes it has been confirmed: http://www.bbc.co.uk/eastenders/news...50316_n2.shtml
The departure was awful and dialogue lets just not go there. And read the last page for my opinions on the Mitchells!
I want Sharon back but not for another love triangle. The last one was a huge mistake!Quote:
Originally Posted by *JSW*
i agree, i kinda lost my way in the happenings! :angel:
Yeah I read that they were being axed in Inside Soap *sobs into hankie*
All it says re: when they leave is "Jake and Danny will leave the show in an explosive storyline later this year" confirms an Eastenders spokesperson'. But apparently the door has been left open for return at a later date.
I personally don't want them go - maybe I'm the only one whop actually prefers Danny to Jake. There's just something about him - I mean his vibe that his character gives off that hints there's some reason why Jake is so over-protective. And mondays eppy where Johnny was ripping into him and making comments about his past - Danny just had this look in his eyes. Hmm maybe it's just my mind being over-imaginative, but I would like to see their characters being explored a bit more before their exit.
I always thought that Jake maybe Johnny's secret son or something.
no i think it is danny that is johnny allens secret son!!!
They leave this summer!!:(
i think that they are quite good although i remember reading somewhere danny was only meant to be in it for 6 episodes could be wrong though
No he was a full time character! :)
it must be my memory its never been good