-
has anybody read this weeks Helo article? is it out yet??
my thinking on the Sam pregnancy is that she will get rid of the baby as its more dramatic and will strengthen the bond between her and phil whilst weakening the bond between her and stu! plus how would she be able to stay a copper at sunhill with a new born baby, it would mean at least a year of maternity leave and there would be no way for the story to go. Also the writers have not spent the last 2 and a half years building the sexual tension between Sam and Phil for it to amount to nothing so i think it is inevitable the pair will get together! i think the writers (and the actor who plays stuart) have done a good job at making him unlikable and mysterious so i dont think he will be a permanent fixture in the show!!
-
I agree adorableangel.
Would someone please tell me what it said in the Hello article!!! lol!!
-
bex i think thats what she thinks as shes asking whether its out yet
i havent got the mag but i looked on the hello site and its about why her life over here is better than hollywood which is always what her interviews are about so hopefully it will have some diff bits in it
-
So as some of you know, im not really one for posting on this site anymore, however i thought i had to break habit on this subject, too much unfortunatly cant be said, however lets just say a baby sharnt be popping out of Sam in 9 months time.
And the Stuart storyline is basically a tactic used to move the story of phil/sam along! Why do u think they have recently come back to it, when Sam and Phil have barely spoken in the last few months.?
-
Is that a confirmed spoiler or rumour?? If its a spoiler, where'd did you find out? I looked on DS but couldn't see anything.
-
Most people on here know that my info checks out,( hi 2 all u guys- im back):) I unfortunatly cannot reveal my source but i do get the information first hand from people who work on the set of the bill.
If you want a real source then fair do's but ive been bringing spoilers to this site for a long time before my recent absense.
-
I think you took my post the wrong way! I wasn't at all disbelieving of your spoilers and I totally trust your spoilers (I have always in the past). Thanks for the spoilers. No offence meant at all!
Anyway, about that info= woo hoo!! So she doesnt have the baby but it that because of a miscarriage or an abortion???
Bex
x
-
lol! i didnt take offence at all, i was just merely pointing out that i cannt say where i get my stuf from and i coudlnt remeber if you were around when i was here last so didnt know if you knew you could trust my info!
Im afraid i really cant say anymore, there has been alot of issues with spoiler leakages of to much detail down at the set, so im afraid its much harder to get and give any details of storys nowadays, and whilst i do still have one or two regular sources it would be too easy to narrow it down back to me due to the now limited amount of people who can get accsess.
But i will try and give you guys as much general information as i can, just no specific details can really be given im afraid!!
-
Thanks alot!
I was just wondering aloud, as you do! lol! I think it would be better if she miscarried cos then i think she would shut Stuart out and turn to Phil for support. Also, i can kind of see Stu blaming her for the miscarriage, espeially if it happened in Romania, which would basically split them up.
What does everyone else think???
-
i agree Bex, think that as the emphasis is put on phil and sam during the Romania episodes it will be very likely that it is at this time she has a miscarriage where phil can be there to comfort her and Stuart is left out in the cold. perhaps when stu finds out that Sam is pregnant he tries to stop her from going to Romania, but as she decides to go (witout making any decision over keeping the baby) then has a miscarriage stuart is likely to blame her and this could be the end of the relationship. i cannot see Sam having an abortion, also in reality women of Sams age tat get pregnant are at a higher risk of miscarrying
