View Full Version : Ratings?
tammyy2j
03-06-2005, 12:04
Has EE ratings been affected by Kat's return i.e. have they gone up?
I don't know yet, but why would they?
I seriously doubt they would have gone up.
i_luv_dennis
03-06-2005, 14:17
propley
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
03-06-2005, 17:01
Yeah does anyoone here know how to find out soap or programme viewer ratings?
I'd appreciate it if you could tell me!
Thanks xx
melanielovesdennisrickman
03-06-2005, 17:27
Hiya!!!!!
You can find the ratings in Heat Magazine every week,i think they were something like 11.6 million last week,i know EastEnders was number one anyway,wich is absolutely great ofcourse!!!!!
I do not really know if there is a website to look it up,or something like that,maybe you should try and look on Google,or something like that!!!!!
Love
:heart: Melanie :heart:
Carrie Bradshaw
03-06-2005, 19:01
There is a thread on Talk Walford where viewing figures are posted. I don't think the ones for last week are out yet though. They post Corrie and Emmerdale ratings too to compare them.
Behemoth
03-06-2005, 19:25
It wasn't advertised that much as far as I know that she would be returning (except for WQ's sig!) so I don't think there will have been a huge increase.
callummc
03-06-2005, 19:47
the ratings in heat are never correct ,if you look on the other websites you'll see that since christmas except for the odd episode ee as much as we'd love it to change has not beaten corrie and to be honest i'm not suprised it's lost it's sparkle,but talking about ratings does anyone agree that it'd be a good idea to have a ratings thread on here,where each week we can post the ratings and discuss how well ee is doing and compare how they are improving their ratings
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
03-06-2005, 21:28
Yeah we should have a thread to compare them. Can anyone tell me what eastenders, corrie and emmerdale get please?
And also, do you have to register on Talk Walford?
Carrie Bradshaw
03-06-2005, 22:54
These are the latest figures.
week ending 22/05
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934) 12.36
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029)11.17
CORONATION STREET (WED 1930)11.05
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929)10.78
EASTENDERS (MON 2001)10.53
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1933)10.40
EASTENDERS (THU 1930)9.56
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 9.46
EASTENDERS (TUE 1930)9.36
EMMERDALE (THU 19030 8.85
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 8.72
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 8.67
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903)8.66
EMMERDALE (FRI 1901)8.31
EMMERDALE (SUN 1901)7.85
You don't need to register, just click on the link at the top that says 'Click here to enter forums'
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
06-06-2005, 22:11
Thanks carrie!!
callummc
08-06-2005, 01:03
well it' bad news again for Ee last night (mon) CORRIE-9.97 EMMERDALLE-9.25 and finally EE-9.14 so they finished behind emmerdale again,good job emmerdale didn't do another hour special or ee would have been in the sh--.
All the soap figures are down because of the time of the year. EE normally gets 11 and Emmerdale gets about 9. Emmerdale is v.lucky to reach double figures even when it has a 1 hour special.
I don't think EE's ratings are bad atall. Atleast EE has the highest audience recorded for a soap ever :p
All the soap figures are down because of the time of the year. EE normally gets 11 and Emmerdale gets about 9. Emmerdale is v.lucky to reach double figures even when it has a 1 hour special.
I don't think EE's ratings are bad atall. Atleast EE has the highest audience recorded for a soap ever :p
That is the thing about EE, it might not be getting the viewer but it has everyone talking either in a good or bad way.. this forum is a prime example, EE section get more hits and more updates than any other section... Love it or Loath it, everyone has an opinion on it
Bad Wolf
08-06-2005, 11:21
so is corrie a mainly northern thing? my mum wont have ee on in the house!
di marco
08-06-2005, 11:22
so is corrie a mainly northern thing? my mum wont have ee on in the house!
well we live in the south and my parents and my gran watch corrie and so do a few of my friends but i just dont see the appeal of it, the times ive seen it, it just bores me!
That is the thing about EE, it might not be getting the viewer but it has everyone talking either in a good or bad way.. this forum is a prime example, EE section get more hits and more updates than any other section... Love it or Loath it, everyone has an opinion on it
That's because our link is on the official EastEnders website :)
I bet that's where most traffic is directed from.
Carrie Bradshaw
09-06-2005, 16:42
w/e 29/05/2005
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934)11.61
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029)10.69
EASTENDERS (MON 2002)10.50
EASTENDERS (TUE 1930)9.96
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1933)9.50
EMMERDALE (MON 1902)9.24
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929)9.03
EASTENDERS (THU 1930)9.00
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903)8.89
CORONATION STREET (FRI 2029)8.77
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000)8.57
EMMERDALE (THU 1903)7.73
EMMERDALE (FRI 1901)7.33
EMMERDALE (SUN 1901)6.5
It's evident that all the ratings are down, I wonder why they drop around this time of the year. I still watch and love my soaps.
di marco
09-06-2005, 19:54
It's evident that all the ratings are down, I wonder why they drop around this time of the year. I still watch and love my soaps.
maybe its cos people go on holiday and even if they record them to watch later then its not included in the ratings, and this time of year is when most people go on holiday
callummc
10-06-2005, 00:41
also sometimes you don't realise the time,look at your watch and it's 8 o clock,i think it's to do with the weather still being warm and the suns still out,we just don't associate daylight with watching tv
callummc
15-06-2005, 00:42
Wellthe ratings are down for all 3 soaps for last night mon June 12th Corrie only just won with 9.37 Ee second with 9.03 and 3rd was emmerdale with 8.38,i don't think emmerdale will be to upset cos thats not bad for them and last nights ee was a good one so it's a shame more people didn't give it a go cos it was good enough to make people want to watch tonights which was also ok and then they might of got back in the habit,never mind cos at least we can now tell them theve missed a couple of good episodes,maybe sharon and dennis will give ee a much needed win next week-fingers crossed
maybe its cos people go on holiday and even if they record them to watch later then its not included in the ratings, and this time of year is when most people go on holiday
It is included in the ratings on BARB.
Carrie Bradshaw
15-06-2005, 13:51
Ratings w/e 05/06/2005
CORONATION STREET (WED 1930) 11.24
CORONATION STREET (MON 2100) 10.58
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 10.16
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1932) 9.86
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 9.72
EASTENDERS (MON 2000) 9.37
EASTENDERS (THU 1930) 9.18
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 8.92
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 8.88
EASTENDERS (TUE 1931) 8.47
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.57
EMMERDALE (FRI 1900) 7.89
EMMERDALE (MON 1934) 7.89
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903) 7.82
EMMERDALE (SUN 1900) 7.21
They're all on a bit of a dip.
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
17-06-2005, 19:27
wow eastenders didnt even beat corrie a little bit
gr8...NOT
AleX liddell
18-06-2005, 18:43
Did the ratings rise last night in eastenders when shannis returned???
Did the ratings rise last night in eastenders when shannis returned???
dont think anyone will know for a bit...surely it must have...loads of my mates watched it that dont usually so if that happens to everyone in the country then we should see a major rise
how good was it compared to corrie last nightr: corrie was boring... enders just rocked!
bondboffin
di marco
18-06-2005, 20:18
dont think anyone will know for a bit...surely it must have...loads of my mates watched it that dont usually so if that happens to everyone in the country then we should see a major rise
how good was it compared to corrie last nightr: corrie was boring... enders just rocked!
bondboffin
dunno dont watch corrie cos its always boring but ee was great last night
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
19-06-2005, 22:36
Yeah can anyone put up the last weeks ones please? Hopefully they will have improved!
I'm glad this thread has been started, its good. It should be made a sticky, though, maybe, please? lol
We have too many stickys at present but I'll certainly look into doing it in future :)
The ratings always go down in Summer but they're really bad for all the 3 top soaps at present.
Chris_2k11
19-06-2005, 23:31
It's because people are on holiday, spending more time outside in the sun, etc.
I would rather watch my soaps lol.
I would rather watch my soaps lol.
me aswelll :D thats very sad tough lol
bondboffin
I can still enjoy the sunshine after they're finished. Corrie is just background noise for me at the moment anyways. Mind you at this rate the horse racing would make a better sound :D
AleX liddell
20-06-2005, 19:02
Hee hee!!! Never mind at least ill be watching it while they are in it!!!!!
I can still enjoy the sunshine after they're finished. Corrie is just background noise for me at the moment anyways. Mind you at this rate the horse racing would make a better sound :D
i dont seem to like corrie recently im usaully doing other stuff whilst its on...like writing on these boards
the things i do for you lot! lol
bondboffin
di marco
21-06-2005, 15:03
i dont seem to like corrie recently im usaully doing other stuff whilst its on...like writing on these boards
the things i do for you lot! lol
bondboffin
hate corrie, i find it so boring, never really watched it, the only time i felt like watching it was this xmas when karen ran off with amy and set the car on fire. other than that it sends me to sleep
hate corrie, i find it so boring, never really watched it, the only time i felt like watching it was this xmas when karen ran off with amy and set the car on fire. other than that it sends me to sleep
it has its goods episodes once in a blue moon: mad mya, richard hillman etc but in general it isnt as good as eastenders
bondboffin
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
21-06-2005, 18:41
The ratings always go down in Summer but they're really bad for all the 3 top soaps at present. Thanks walford queen about the sticky.
I understand what your saying about all three soaps ratings being down, but Eatenders should be at leats level with corrie shouldnt they?
I dont know about you but Eastenders has been much better recently.
I was actually excited about the last few episodes, and i cannot wait for the one tonight (tue). Its the first time in ages that they hav left some episodes at good cliffhangers - friday and monday.
Anyway, sorry for going off topic! Back to ratings lol
Thanks walford queen about the sticky.
I understand what your saying about all three soaps ratings being down, but Eatenders should be at leats level with corrie shouldnt they?
I dont know about you but Eastenders has been much better recently.
I was actually excited about the last few episodes, and i cannot wait for the one tonight (tue). Its the first time in ages that they hav left some episodes at good cliffhangers - friday and monday.
Anyway, sorry for going off topic! Back to ratings lol
if eastednder havent equalled or beat corrie ratings then i will be very shocked!
bondboffin
Coronation Street always gets about a million more than EastEnders and EastEnders gets about 1-2 million more than Emmerdale.
callummc
22-06-2005, 00:30
Yes just recently but it allways used to be swings and roundabouts with the top 2,but since christmas corries had it all their own way,maybe this weeks good stuff will bring back the watts fans and once they start watching again who knows,if the writing stays good corrie could fall back into the ailing soap categry
Corrie is still on level footing though although heading for the slopes.
callummc
22-06-2005, 00:35
I know and used to gloat,didn't know what it was like to constantly read how crap my fav programme was and since christmas have to kick myself for ageeing under my breath,learnt my lesson now though i hope.
Corrie is still on level footing though although heading for the slopes.
Ascending not descending WQ :p
Ascending not descending WQ :p
Nah it's gone downhill, I'm beginning to think it's goodness was all down to the dearly missed Carolyn Reynolds.
love ur banner alan45!!!! :rotfl:
bondboffin
Nah it's gone downhill, I'm beginning to think it's goodness was all down to the dearly missed Carolyn Reynolds.
it hasnt got what it used to have, at times every epsiode had some drama, espically of a monday night for the two parter
now it is just plain boring... the shelly and charlie fiasco isn't doing the show any fvaours, In My Honest Opinion
bondboffin
it hasnt got what it used to have, at times every epsiode had some drama, espically of a monday night for the two parter
now it is just plain boring... the shelly and charlie fiasco isn't doing the show any fvaours, In My Honest Opinion
bondboffin
The Monday episodes are ridiculous now. It used to be good when Richard Hillman was in the show because they had the suspense and people couldn't wait till the next installment but now they end on such poor cliffhangers. No wonder it loses 2 million viewers or so.
Carrie Bradshaw
22-06-2005, 18:34
Here are the ratings for w/e 12/06/2005
CORONATION STREET (MON 2100) 11.16
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 10.30
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1932) 10.18
CORONATION STREET (SUN 2024) 9.99
EMMERDALE (MON 1934) 9.72
EASTENDERS (MON 2001) 9.54
EASTENDERS (TUE 1930) 9.44
CORONATION STREET (WED 1930) 9.44
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 8.97
EASTENDERS (THU 1931) 8.69
EMMERDALE (TUE 1902) 8.43
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.41
EMMERDALE (FRI 1900) 7.79
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 7.5
Monday's Emmerdale was moved to Corrie's usual 7.30 timeslot so this is why it may have more viewers than usual.
it hasnt got what it used to have, at times every epsiode had some drama, espically of a monday night for the two parter
now it is just plain boring... the shelly and charlie fiasco isn't doing the show any fvaours, In My Honest Opinion
bondboffin
This Mondays episode was pure drama and the finish of the first part left a fantastic cliffhanger for part two. The Shelley/Charlie storylie is far from being a fiasco. It is superb drama brilliantly portrayed. I do feel that except for genuine reasons such as this then the 2nd monday episode should be phased out
Richie_lecturer
22-06-2005, 20:06
Over 11m for a 9pm episode of Corrie.
That's very impressive. :clap:
P.S. Nice picture Alan. :thumbsup: :cool:
P.S. 2: The cardboard funfair was 1 year ago today: (http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/eastenders/realmedia/episodes/catchup/604?size=16x9&bgc=C0C0C0&nbram=1&bbram=1)
I can't understand why just because it's summer that they dip. I personally do not stop watching my soaps.
Richie_lecturer
22-06-2005, 21:27
I tend to watch less during the summer, especially in this sort of weather. I tend to drive out to the Dales or to Scarborough during the evenings, or eat out, rather than stay indoors and watch the soaps and other TV.
I only really watch EE at the moment anyways. I feel like it's too hot to just lounge around and watch the others. I put them on but I'm not normally sat there glued. If I miss 3 episodes of Emmerdale nothing happens anyways, it's on six times a week so it's fine I miss a few, same with Corrie I can miss one or two of them as well.
The Shelley/Charlie storylie is far from being a fiasco. It is superb drama brilliantly portrayed
to alan45 :bow: :bow: :bow:
agree with that!!
to alan45 :bow: :bow: :bow:
agree with that!!
No, it's boring and everything that a storyline shouldn't be. For me it's the Mofie of the cobbles.
Dont worry it's set to get exciting when Des Barnes returns to the Rovers and utters the immortal words 'Ello Princess'
No, it's boring and everything that a storyline shouldn't be. For me it's the Mofie of the cobbles.
i agree it is boring and a rubbish storyline
but please dont compare it to molfie...i love molfie!!!! :cheer: and hate kalfie :angry:
if you sleep around and become a drunken old slapper and dissapear for six months without no contact you cant expect your husbands to make up with you and take you back
bondboffin
i agree it is boring and a rubbish storyline
but please dont compare it to molfie...i love molfie!!!! :cheer: and hate kalfie :angry:
Well that explains why you dont like the Shelly/Charlie storyline. Perhaps we should give it a daft name such as SHARLLEY :moonie:
I'm sorry, even contemplating getting involved with your sisters ex husband is sick and twisted (same goes for Zoe and Kat with the same blokes). But then the same could be said for Billy Mitchell (getting involved with him generally is a bit twisted as well!)
I'm sorry, even contemplating getting involved with your sisters ex husband is sick and twisted (same goes for Zoe and Kat with the same blokes). But then the same could be said for Billy Mitchell (getting involved with him generally is a bit twisted as well!)
harry and kat is sick and twisted
alfie and mo cant be put in the same calbire, they are two similat people who want a simple life, settle down and have no major dramas, like what arouse with kalfie
some may think it is wrong to go with your sisters ex, but i see no wrong, as he is just that: an ex, so it shou;ldnt bother anyone... if kat cared for alfire she'd have never bedded andy and that random ginger man or make his life hell in general
bondboffin
Harry and Kat was rape and child abuse NOT THE SAME THING AT ALL.
I personally do not think the you should have the same partners as member of your own blood related family.
Harry and Kat was rape and child abuse NOT THE SAME THING AT ALL.
I personally do not think the you should have the same partners as member of your own blood related family.
that's your opinion...but i see nothing wrong with it, it isnt incest or adultery... its just two people who adore each other and coincidenta;lly they used to be in laws... it is legally allowed and it shouldnt really matter
i cannot see how anyone has a problem with this...it's just becuase you all adore your preciosu kalfie too much: meant for each other? lol they didnt even last a year
and we know who to blame for them splitting up.... billy or charlie
bondboffin
that's your opinion...but i see nothing wrong with it, it isnt incest or adultery... its just two people who adore each other and coincidenta;lly they used to be in laws... it is legally allowed and it shouldnt really matter
i cannot see how anyone has a problem with this...it's just becuase you all adore your preciosu kalfie too much: meant for each other? lol they didnt even last a year
and we know who to blame for them splitting up.... billy or charlie
bondboffin
Louise Berridge :)
Dont worry it's set to get exciting when Des Barnes returns to the Rovers and utters the immortal words 'Ello Princess'
Wouldn't even have a tenth of the same dramatic effect.
i cannot see how anyone has a problem with this...it's just becuase you all adore your preciosu kalfie too much: meant for each other? lol they didnt even last a year
No not really Mo and Alfie have as much sexual chemstry as Ken and Dedrie.
I think Kat has now out grown Alfie, and hope they dont get back together.
Kat is a much better character.
MO is a total waste of a fantastic actress - Kacey was superb in the Trevor abuse storylines now she is just a wimp
MO is a total waste of a fantastic actress - Kacey was superb in the Trevor abuse storylines now she is just a wimp
Very well put!!!, and she was was great in the harrowing Graham rape, and aftermath.
Very well put!!!, and she was was great in the harrowing Graham rape, and aftermath.
i like molfie...better than some relationships in the square... we all know little mo will get some great stuff when alfie leaves but once a storyline starts it cant just stop in mid air
besides why should alfie go back to that slapper kat and little mo to that useless ape billy!!!?
little mo can go back to billy once alfie leaves then that sasha rumour can take place
bondboffin
Mo and alfie (notcie I didnt say mofie, annoys the hell out of me that), should not have begun in the first place.
Kat is not a slapper any more, Dennis was and he's been given a second chance so why not Kat?? (oh forgot, its much worse for a woment to sleep around :angry: )
I dont think Mo shoud go back to Billy or Kat should go back to Alfie.
Mo and alfie (notcie I didnt say mofie, annoys the hell out of me that), should not have begun in the first place.
Kat is not a slapper any more, Dennis was and he's been given a second chance so why not Kat?? (oh forgot, its much worse for a woment to sleep around :angry: )
I dont think Mo shoud go back to Billy or Kat should go back to Alfie.
kat is still a slapper in my honest opinion she slept with andy and that ginger man whilst ebing with alfie, then left and slept with that bloke that mo punched... and then she walks back expecting a full on relationship with alfie...trying it on with the poor man when he dosent want anymore to do with her.
she changes her men like her underwear (no thats wrong actually, she dont change her underwear that often, becuase its always off on the floor!!!)
bondboffin
I hope Dennis is still a Slapper in your book then, even though at present he is in a relationship with Sharon, like Kat was with Alfie for a long while.
di marco
25-06-2005, 13:22
I hope Dennis is still a Slapper in your book then, even though at present he is in a relationship with Sharon, like Kat was with Alfie for a long while.
i agree, if kats classed as a slapper then dennis should be too. people always just think its wrong that girls sleep around and never give a second thought when boys do it
i agree, if kats classed as a slapper then dennis should be too. people always just think its wrong that girls sleep around and never give a second thought when boys do it
dennis sused to be...but he has been in commited relationships for over a year now.. a long term one with zoe, and then with sharon
he didnt have one night stands with random girls or people he knew, kat puts herself around a lot more than dennis
i know dennis had his twenty five flings when he first came in but he has settled down, whereas kat hasnt
once alfie leaves kat will be bedhopping like a kangaroo with a firework up its :moonie:
bondboffin
MO is a total waste of a fantastic actress - Kacey was superb in the Trevor abuse storylines now she is just a wimp
Agreed but the good thing was the chracter has always been a bit of wimp they didn't alter her in anyway in order to make the abuse storyline work.
he didnt have one night stands with random girls or people he knew
When Dennis arrived in the square he slept with everying in a skirt, that weird nanny for one!!
Dennis also slept with Sharon when he was with Zoe!!
When Dennis arrived in the square he slept with everying in a skirt, that weird nanny for one!!
Dennis also slept with Sharon when he was with Zoe!!
You mean Joanne, she was quite a good character actually.
i agree, if kats classed as a slapper then dennis should be too. people always just think its wrong that girls sleep around and never give a second thought when boys do it
Thanks!! It really annoys me that a women is classed as a slapper and a bloke is classed as a stud!!!
BTW I dont think Dennis or Kat are Slappers/or whatever, just trying to make a point!!
Men can get away with sleeping around for some reason. It is considered "cool" especially amongst their friends.
When Dennis arrived in the square he slept with everying in a skirt, that weird nanny for one!!
Dennis also slept with Sharon when he was with Zoe!!
i was on about other than that... follwoing his foirts few months he was no longer a slapper
and him and sharon were mean to be, and it wasnt just a one night stand it was for real and instead of doing a kat and having 2 on the go at once he dumped zoe
bondboffin
Well Dennis even slept with our Trace the barmaid.
Well Dennis even slept with our Trace the barmaid.
did he????!!!!!?????
when????
bondboffin
When Sharon stormed into the Vic with the pair of red knickers she'd found stuffed down the back of the sofa. Tracey looked flabbergasted and even dropped a glass! Luckily though Sharon didn't notice. I think we were supposed to get the impression the knickers belonged to her but it wasn't in the script.
When Sharon stormed into the Vic with the pair of red knickers she'd found stuffed down the back of the sofa. Tracey looked flabbergasted and even dropped a glass! Luckily though Sharon didn't notice. I think we were supposed to get the impression the knickers belonged to her but it wasn't in the script.
oh my god i never noticed...tracy? :sick: could that really have happened?
do you reckon the tracy actress did that spontonaosuly to get viewers thinking she had a storyline lol
bondboffin
Maybe but I got the idea the knickers were hers and it was so obvious.
di marco
25-06-2005, 14:39
Thanks!! It really annoys me that a women is classed as a slapper and a bloke is classed as a stud!!!
BTW I dont think Dennis or Kat are Slappers/or whatever, just trying to make a point!!
yeh i dont class kat and dennis as slappers either. but it just annoys me as well when people (mostly men) think they have the right to call girls who have a few one-night stands slappers when men can get away with a lot worse
It's because men aren't even supposed to be here, they don't get recognised for a lot of things and this is one of them. They were just a first draft. God made them and then he made us - the real deal :D
di marco
25-06-2005, 14:45
It's because men aren't even supposed to be here, they don't get recognised for a lot of things and this is one of them. They were just a first draft. God made them and then he made us - the real deal :D
lol so true! :D
lol so true! :D
Too true :cheer:
Carrie Bradshaw
25-06-2005, 23:07
It's because men aren't even supposed to be here, they don't get recognised for a lot of things and this is one of them. They were just a first draft. God made them and then he made us - the real deal :D
I've never heard it put that way before - I must store it away in my brain. I'm sure it will be a useful comeback one day!
LOL, it's a good one Carrie.
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
29-06-2005, 20:30
Hey, i was just wandering if anyone can post the next ratings now?
Sorry, i just like to keep up!
Carrie Bradshaw
30-06-2005, 13:39
Sorry, they're a bit late!
Week Ending 19/06/05
CORONATION STREET (WED 1930) 10.34
CORONATION STREET (MON 2101) 10.14
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 10.09
EASTENDERS (MON 2000) 9.58
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1932) 9.35
EASTENDERS (THU 1931)9.03
EASTENDERS (TUE 1931) 8.92
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 8.84
CORONATION STREET (SUN 2055) 8.82
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 8.45
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.12
EMMERDALE (WED 1858)8.11
EMMERDALE (TUE 1902) 8.04
EMMERDALE (FRI 1900) 7.09
Looking good. EE have had a bit of a boost. Not bad considering it's Summer.
Looking good. EE have had a bit of a boost. Not bad considering it's Summer.
what week was thius tough? zoe's leaving week???
i thoight they would have been better
bondboffin
what week was thius tough? zoe's leaving week???
i thoight they would have been better
bondboffin
Sadly it's summer and you won't get much more than that :D
Anyways it was the week before Zoe left.
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
01-07-2005, 19:03
what week was thius tough? zoe's leaving week???
i thoight they would have been better
bondboffin Me too. I mean, I know that ratings drop in summer, but corrie still get 10 million dont they?
I dont watch corrie, but if anyone here does, can they tell me what was better - corrie or eastenders?
Personally, zoes leaving week was the best eastenders i've seen in ages.
Jessie Wallace
02-07-2005, 23:37
I hope so she is great.
Carrie Bradshaw
07-07-2005, 13:28
w/e 26/06/2005
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1932) 10.57
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934) 9.96
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 9.90
EASTENDERS (FRI 1959) 9.67
EASTENDERS (MON 2002) 9.29
CORONATION STREET (WED 1930) 9.26
EASTENDERS (TUE 1932) 9.01
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 8.96
EMMERDALE (FRI 1900) 8.13
EASTENDERS (THU 1931) 7.99
EMMERDALE (TUE 1902) 7.56
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 7.27
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 7.24
EMMERDALE (WED 1858)7.18
EMMERDALE (SUN 1900) 6.23
This was Zoe's leaving week - Friday's EE got more viewers than usual!
them are much better than the six million they were getting, hopefully this ratings will only increase even more in future months
bondboffin
good ratings. There improving greatily.
callummc
08-07-2005, 14:32
If you look back EE did have a couple of really bad ratings last year when they went up against emmerdale specials and EE scipts were bad but at least they were taking the top slot every now and then where as since Feb they havn't managed the top slot and ae constantly being beat by corrie which in my opinion is now slipping also i can't help thinking that the glory days for the soaps are coming to an end and unless they listen to what viewers want and stop going for a quick fix a day will come when nobodys interested anymore and the soaps will not be able to afford their high budgets and just turn into low budget daytime TV
If you look back EE did have a couple of really bad ratings last year when they went up against emmerdale specials and EE scipts were bad but at least they were taking the top slot every now and then where as since Feb they havn't managed the top slot and ae constantly being beat by corrie which in my opinion is now slipping also i can't help thinking that the glory days for the soaps are coming to an end and unless they listen to what viewers want and stop going for a quick fix a day will come when nobodys interested anymore and the soaps will not be able to afford their high budgets and just turn into low budget daytime TV
i cnat help feeling there is some truth to what you are saying, but ten/nine million is still good ratings for a show to be fair
lildevil
08-07-2005, 20:26
why does every thing have to be about kat?
EE's ratings are getting better. They just need to keep going with dramatic stoylines and not very boring ones like: Pat's new earrings
xxx
Me too. I mean, I know that ratings drop in summer, but corrie still get 10 million dont they?
I dont watch corrie, but if anyone here does, can they tell me what was better - corrie or eastenders?
Personally, zoes leaving week was the best eastenders i've seen in ages.
corrie hasnt been better than eastenders since last november
Carrie Bradshaw
18-08-2005, 10:16
Thought I'd start this thread up again if anyone's interested - here are last weeks viewing figures.
Week beginning 07/08/2005
CORONATION STREET (MON 2030) 10.44
CORONATION STREET (MON 1935) 10.30
CORONATION STREET (WED 1931) 9.60
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1934) 9.59
CORONATION STREET (SUN 19290 9.10
EASTENDERS (MON 2001) 8.89
EASTENDERS (FRI 2002) 8.28
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.24
EASTENDERS (TUE 1932) 8.21
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 8.20
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903) 8.07
EASTENDERS (THU 1929) 7.98
EMMERDALE (FRI 1902) 7.98
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 7.84
EMMERDALE (SUN 1858) 6.57
CrazyLea
18-08-2005, 10:59
so coronation street is beating eastenders then
.:SpIcYsPy:.
18-08-2005, 14:11
Oh...
i_luv_dennis
18-08-2005, 14:28
how do you get your name like walford queen
CrazyLea
18-08-2005, 15:03
you save ya money and then you can buy it
so coronation street is beating eastenders thenEastenders is really rather poor in comparison to Coronation Street. But I'm sure the tables will turn again, they always do.
so coronation street is beating eastenders thenIt has done for ages it was marginally beating it when EE was the no.1 soap for quality a few years ago. Corrie has it's own dedicated fanbase it has been on since 1960 afterall and most of it's audience are over 45!
Eastenders is really rather poor in comparison to Coronation Street. But I'm sure the tables will turn again, they always do.It's still getting enough viewers to be the no.2 soap though which is a good thing :)
It doesn't matter if Emmerdale beats it the odd day it has to happen consistently in both audience share and viewers :)
Carrie Bradshaw
02-09-2005, 17:13
w/e 21/08/2005
CORONATION STREET (MON 2031) 10.53
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934) 10.35
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 9.59
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1934) 9.57
CORONATION STREET (WED 1931) 9.02
EASTENDERS (MON 2001) 8.85
EASTENDERS (FRI 2001) 8.32
EASTENDERS (THU 1931) 8.29
EASTENDERS (TUE 1930) 8.22
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 8.22
EMMERDALE (FRI 1902) 7.85
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903) 7.73
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 7.67
EMMERDALE (WED 1900) 7.01
EMMERDALE (SUN 1859) 6.94
callummc
02-09-2005, 21:27
EE has never had ratings so bad for 6 months solid they havnt beet corrie,mind you they havnt been trying hard have they,after a fantastic christmas day its just gone down hill
Carrie Bradshaw
05-09-2005, 15:58
Overnights for Thurs 1/9
Eastenders - 9.8 million - 48% share
Emmerdale - 8.1 million - 45% share
and Fri 2/9
1/ EastEnders - 8.7m - 44.8%
2/ Coronation St. - 8.6m - 48.2%
3/ Emmerdale - 6.9m - 43.4%
I think they're pretty good - Friday always has lower ratings than the rest of the week.
Eastenders is crawling back at last
Carrie Bradshaw
06-09-2005, 12:32
EastEnders pulled ahead of Coronation Street for the first time in months last night, according to early ratings figures.
The BBC soap has seen its audiences restored to a respectable level over the past week with a storyline involving the discovery of Dirty Den's body underneath the Queen Vic. Yesterday's episode averaged 10.68 million viewers, a 49.4% share of the audience, with a first place ranking for the day.
Coronation Street followed with respective audiences of 10.3 million (50.4%) and 9.31 million (39.8%) for its 7.30pm and 8.30pm episodes. Emmerdale took fourth with 7.9 million (42.3%).
:cheer: Great news!!
Richie_lecturer
06-09-2005, 17:47
Well done EE, but remember, one swallow does not make a summer. It now needs to keep this up.
Technically it still lost out to Corrie in terms of share, although even EE's share was just a fraction behind their Weatherfield rivals.
eastenderfan_91
07-09-2005, 12:47
i would have thought they would go up
Carrie Bradshaw
07-09-2005, 15:57
From Tuesday:
EastEnders remained the day's overall top performer with an audience of 9.37 million (49.8%) at 7.30pm. Emmerdale finished second with 7.32 million (42.6%), while Holby City took 6.43 million (30.3%) for third.
Eastenders is definitely beating Emmerdale at the moment! :)
Carrie Bradshaw
08-09-2005, 12:19
w/e 28/08/2005
CORONATION STREET (MON 2031) 10.56
CORONATION STREET (MON 1933) 10.48
CORONATION STREET (WED 1931) 10.11
EASTENDERS (TUE 1931) 9.87
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 9.25
EASTENDERS (MON 2000) 9.43
EASTENDERS (THU 1932) 8.78
EMMERDALE (TUE 1900) 8.67
EMMERDALE (WED 1859) 8.53
EMMERDALE (MON 1901) 8.50
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 8.10
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.06
EMMERDALE (FRI 1900) 7.79
EMMERDALE (SUN 1900) 6.48
callummc
09-09-2005, 00:01
Ee used to win top place week after week not a few times a year,theres a lot more work needs doing if they want to return to that position
Jessie Wallace
09-09-2005, 00:08
I can't see what they are doing wrong the show is great at the mo.
callummc
09-09-2005, 00:15
i'm sorry id like to agree,but cant its the alfie bits that are boring me silly,that threesomes worse than the den,dennis,zoey storyline,probably cos them 3 could act,no disrespect to jessie and kacie,but shanes attempts at seriou acting,leave a lot to be desired
i'm sorry id like to agree,but cant its the alfie bits that are boring me silly,that threesomes worse than the den,dennis,zoey storyline,probably cos them 3 could act,no disrespect to jessie and kacie,but shanes attempts at seriou acting,leave a lot to be desired
im loving the klat and alfie story, fed up of wimpy little mo though!
shame they have to ruin their back to togetherness, it has gone ona bit too long now.
Carrie Bradshaw
10-09-2005, 16:30
Overnights for Thurs:
EastEnders: 9.6 million (47%)
Emmerdale: 8 million (43%)
And Fri:
The return of Barbara Windsor kept EastEnders ahead of Coronation Street with respective audiences of 9.96 million (46.9%) and 9.79 million (48.7%). Emmerdale had to settle for fourth with a distant 7.8 million (42.9%).
Richie_lecturer
10-09-2005, 22:55
And Fri:
The return of Barbara Windsor kept EastEnders ahead of Coronation Street with respective audiences of 9.96 million (46.9%) and 9.79 million (48.7%).
Poor journalism in that article. What any Media bigwig will tell you is it's the share that matters, not the audience size. So in that respect, Corrie still came out better off, though as Abi says above, it is not difficult to decipher that things are nonetheless very close.
callummc
15-09-2005, 00:26
Well i'm afraid to say corrie kicked back this mon with 10.12 and ee got 9.58,corrie also got the largest share of the audience,one good thing though corries second episode was 3rd and emmerdale 4th,not good enough though,EE need to be no 1 at least once a week,when their on in the same night as corrie
So it would appear the EE return has run out of steam
Richie_lecturer
15-09-2005, 00:37
Yes I think the Peggy/disturbing Den effect has gone down like a damp squib. Those (partly) hyped up eppies may have attracted a large audience and share for just over a week, neck and neck with Corrie, but it does not seem to have had the desired long-term effect of maintaining that postion. EE has slipped back to its average level this year again, i.e. just in front of Emmerdale. The 2nd Corrie ep did poorly, another reason why it should be scrapped.
Certainly if the ratings don't pick up for the first week in October, when the rest of the Mitchell clan return, then EE's road to recovery will have been (temporarily) halted.
callummc
15-09-2005, 12:48
no doubt the ratings will go through the roof for the return of the mitchell brothers,but for how long,their scroipts will just be repeats of what they said years ago,like peggys are,give them a week or 2 and people will start turning over again
Can I just ask though, how exactly are the tv ratings worked out?? Is it based on what channel your tv is on or .......??
It may seem a daft question but my thoughts would be how many of us leave the tv on and then do other stuff around the house, without actually watching whats on? I know I do, and if I have corrie on the box, it doesn't mean I am watching it, cause I'm not.... and what about the people like me that record a lot of their programmes to watch during the day....:searchme:
Sorry, but can anyone tell me??
Dr. Tangliss
15-09-2005, 13:35
Good question, one which I have always wanted to know.
Carrie Bradshaw
15-09-2005, 13:57
w/e 04/09/2005
CORONATION STREET (WED 1931) 10.68
EASTENDERS (TUE 1931) 10.45
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 10.12
EASTENDERS (THU 1930) 9.77
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934) 9.67
EASTENDERS (MON 2002) 9.29
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 9.20
EASTENDERS (FRI 2001) 9.09
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1934) 9.04
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.39
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903) 8.28
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 8.08
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 7.48
EMMERDALE (FRI 1903) 7.20
EMMERDALE (SUN 1858) 6.23
EE's best week for a long time!!
Dr. Tangliss
15-09-2005, 13:58
But how do they know these exact figures?
As far as I am aware a certain number of houses in the UK have electronic boxes connected to them which register the viewing patterns of the household. These results are collated by statisticians at BARB who work out the figures from there
w/e 04/09/2005
CORONATION STREET (WED 1931) 10.68
EASTENDERS (TUE 1931) 10.45
CORONATION STREET (MON 2029) 10.12
EASTENDERS (THU 1930) 9.77
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934) 9.67
EASTENDERS (MON 2002) 9.29
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 9.20
EASTENDERS (FRI 2001) 9.09
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1934) 9.04
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.39
EMMERDALE (TUE 1903) 8.28
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 8.08
EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 7.48
EMMERDALE (FRI 1903) 7.20
EMMERDALE (SUN 1858) 6.23
EE's best week for a long time!!
Nice to see that Corrie is still No. 1
Carrie Bradshaw
15-09-2005, 14:02
Can I just ask though, how exactly are the tv ratings worked out?? Is it based on what channel your tv is on or .......??
It may seem a daft question but my thoughts would be how many of us leave the tv on and then do other stuff around the house, without actually watching whats on? I know I do, and if I have corrie on the box, it doesn't mean I am watching it, cause I'm not.... and what about the people like me that record a lot of their programmes to watch during the day....:searchme:
Sorry, but can anyone tell me??
This is from the BARB site:
The Broadcasters' Audience Research Board (BARB) is responsible for providing estimates of the number of people watching television. This includes which channels and programmes are being watched, at what time, and the type of people who are watching at any one time. BARB provides television audience data on a minute-by-minute basis for channels received within the UK. The data is available for reporting nationally and at ITV and BBC regional level and covers all analogue and digital platforms.
Viewing estimates are obtained from panels of television owning households representing the viewing behaviour of the 24+ million households within the UK. The panels are selected to be representative of each ITV and BBC region. The service covers viewing within private households only.
Panel homes are selected via a 'multi-stage, stratified and unclustered' sample design. What this means is that the panel is fully representative of all television households across the whole of the UK. A range of individual and household characteristics (panel controls) are needed to ensure that the panel is fully representative. As estimates for the large majority of panel controls are not available from Census data it is necessary to conduct an Establishment Survey to obtain this information.
The BARB Establishment Survey is carried out on a continuous basis and involves some 52,000 interviews per year. It is a random probability survey which means that any household within the UK has an equal likelihood of being selected for interview. The survey ensures that any changes taking place in the population can be identified so that the panel can be updated and adjusted to ensure that the panel continues to reflect the television-owning population. In addition to being the prime source of television population information, such as the number of multi-channel homes, the Establishment Survey also generates the potential recruits from which panel member homes are selected.
Once a panel member agrees to join the panel, their home will then have all their television sets, video cassette recorders etc. electronically monitored by a meter. This is a small black box about the size of the average hardback book, which is put on top of the television set and connected to it. This automatically identifies and collects information about the programme and channel that the panel member is viewing.
All panel household residents and their guests register their presence when in a room with a television set on. Each individual does this by pressing the button allocated to them on the peoplemeter handset. The metering system monitors all registrations made by each individual.
The panel member does not need to do anything else for BARB to capture all the viewing in each household everyday. Throughout the day the meter system stores all viewing undertaken by the entire household. Each night between 2am and 6am the data processing centre automatically downloads the data from every panel home (a process known as 'polling'). This procedure is carried out on every panel home every day to produce live 'overnight' minute-by-minute television viewing data.
Video playback is measured if it takes place within 7 days of the original broadcast. This viewing (known as timeshift viewing) is then added to the live data to produce the final, minute-by-minute consolidated audience, available 8 days after the original transmission date.
Channels reported by BARB provide detailed timings of the programmes and commercials they broadcast. The records that this produces are then matched to the minute-by-minute viewing data to produce the BARB official audience estimates for programmes and commercials.
Three specialist research companies are contracted to provide BARB with the service: RSMB (responsible for panel design and quality control); Ipsos-RSL (responsible for the Establishment Survey); and AGB Nielsen Media Research (responsible for metering the panel, data collection and processing).
Hope this helps!! :)
Dr. Tangliss
15-09-2005, 14:05
As far as I am aware a certain number of houses in the UK have electronic boxes connected to them which register the viewing patterns of the household. These results are collated by statisticians at BARB who work out the figures from there
Thanks, alan :D
Thanks, alan :D
Here is the link if you want to read more about it http://www.barb.co.uk/ :)
Thanks Alan45 and Carrie Bradshaw for the info - I have always wondered what it is, though I don't think much of any estimations or statistics - they have predicted down here that because we have 350 new houses built there are going to be a certain number of children of a certain age moving in per house etc, no one can guarantee these figures - interesting though....... :D :D
callummc
20-09-2005, 15:32
EE is still a bit behind-the overnights for last night were-corrie-11.61 mill with a 52%share, next EE-11.01 with a 46% share, next corries second episode-10.52 with a 42% share and last but not least-emmerdale-8.91 with a 45% share,so even though emmerdale were last they were only 1% behind EE with their ig storyline coming up tonight
callummc
21-09-2005, 20:52
a gutter for ee last night,emmerdale beat ee in the first of their head to heads,lets hope things are better tomorrow night,dens funeral might make people turn over
Carrie Bradshaw
22-09-2005, 13:24
BARB w/e 11/9/05
EASTENDERS (MON 2004) 11.10
CORONATION STREET (MON 1934) 10.79
CORONATION STREET (FRI 1932) 10.38
EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 10.17
EASTENDERS (THU 1930) 9.84
CORONATION STREET (MON 2030) 9.84
EASTENDERS (TUE 1931) 9.65
CORONATION STREET (SUN 1929) 9.37
CORONATION STREET (WED 1930) 8.93
EMMERDALE (THU 1903) 8.35
EMMERDALE (MON 1901) 8.17
EMMERDALE (FRI 1900) 8.01
EMMERDALE (TUE 1902) 7.69
EMMERDALE (WED 1858) 7.45
I think Eastenders will get beaten again tonight by Emmerdale.. especially since itv have published a photo on their website showing something happening tonight which nobody knew about.. it wasnt in any of the papers... it looks great and will get peoples attention.
EE is realy good at the moment though
Richie_lecturer
22-09-2005, 22:04
I'd be surprised if Emmerdale (much as I'd like them to) won tonight's battle, even though for me it was by far the better of the two tonight.
callummc
04-10-2005, 17:09
overnight ratings for mon 3-10-05, 1.corrie 11.8 million 52% share 2. corries second episode 10.4 million 44% share,3 Ee 10.4 44% share and last emmerdale 9.7 but with a 47% share
Richie_lecturer
04-10-2005, 17:13
Nice to see all the soap getting at least 10m (or at least there or there abouts). Even more pleased that Emmerdale got a good result. That must be both their best share and best audience for a very long time, possibly for about 18 months I think.
callummc
05-10-2005, 12:43
ratings for tuesday still good, ee 10.7 million and a 51% share, emmerdale still hot on theit tail though with 9 million and a 47% share
Richie_lecturer
05-10-2005, 12:46
That's EE's best result share wise for a few months. Well done Emmerdale too, consistently up there with 47% again.
callummc
07-10-2005, 13:38
ratings for thursday-EE-9.8 with a 48%share and emmerdale 8.9 with a 47% share
Richie_lecturer
07-10-2005, 14:24
Well done to both again, especially Emmerdale for keeping 'Enders looking over its shoulder.
callummc
12-10-2005, 19:11
Ratings for friday-corrie-10.9with a 52%share, EE 9.8 with a 45% share. Monday night Corrie's first episode-11.5 52% share,second episode 11.3 46%share, EE is slipping again with 10.5 and a 45% share
Richie_lecturer
12-10-2005, 20:29
Tuesday night:
EE: 11m (50%);
Emmerdale: 9.1m (44%).
callummc
13-10-2005, 00:14
i wonder if ee does better on tuesdays and thursdays cos that was their original nights,anyway just glad to see their ratings are improving
Richie_lecturer
13-10-2005, 14:05
Possibly, although tbh the competition on Tuesdays is led by cheap regional opt-out programming from ITV1. That means it's quite easy for EE to get a big share of the cake.
You can argue the same for ITV however as well Callum for Corrie. I know they haven't had the Friday ep forever (I remember the days when Corrie, like EE, was on just twice a week), but they have had it long enough to establish itself, and that is why Corrie normally does best on Monday (1st episode) and Friday (the Wednesday episode does well but not as well as M & F).
Richie_lecturer
13-10-2005, 14:12
By the way Wednesday's viewing figures/share:
Corrie: 9.9m (42%).
Emmerdale: tbc.
Please note that the football match on BBC1 last night is responsible for the lower than average results for the above two soaps (football got 11m (40%).
callummc
13-10-2005, 18:25
your right ritchie ee does still have problems and theirs no point us thinking up excuses for them,their writings improving but it dosn't help when its still hit and miss,i dont think corries much better,whereas emmerdales writing seems to be getting stronger and is more consistant
squillyfer
13-10-2005, 18:32
I'm glad bbc1 had the football cos wednesday is usually their worst day for ratings
Richie_lecturer
15-10-2005, 15:11
Friday:
Corrie: 10.91m (52%);
EE: 9.59m (43%);
Emmerdale: 8.83m (45%).
Well done Corrie and Emmerdale. EE pushed into third place.
We an expect to see a huge rise in the ratings fo EE when the bruvvas grim return and then after several weeks it will be back to same old same old
Richie_lecturer
15-10-2005, 15:34
Indeed. Short term gain for long-term pain.
Richie_lecturer
18-10-2005, 22:15
Corrie - 10.66 million (44.2%)
Emmerdale - 7.92 million (34.9%)
No news on Monday's yet for some reason, but I think it's time judging from the above to scrap the Sunday ep of Emmerdale.
Jada-GDR
19-10-2005, 10:54
they went up on the day that peggy came back
the dutchess rocks!
i think they went up when sam dug up den's body too but that was ages ago and i dont know about any other rating changes
Richie_lecturer
19-10-2005, 17:22
Monday night:
Corrie 7:30: 11.6m (53.6%);
Emmerdale: 9.3m (45.9%);
EastEnders: 10.3m (44.7%);
Corrie 8:30: 10.3m (42.2%).
So Corrie gets an enormous audience share (7:30), the best for months. Emmerdale one again gets a higher share than EE.
Tuesday night:
EastEnders: 10.08m (44.9%);
Emmerdale: 8.04m (38.6%).
Ratings for both soaps distorted slightly by ITV1 football, though Emmerdale will still be disappointed with that share nonetheless.
Richie_lecturer
25-10-2005, 17:39
Wednesday 19th:
Corrie: 10.4m (48%);
Emmerdale: 8.8m (44%).
Thursday 20th:
EastEnders: 9.997m (47.68%);
Emmerdale: 8.72m (44.52%).
Friday 21st:
Corrie: 10.72m (49.11%);
EastEnders: 9.56m (43.27%);
Emmerdale: 8.67m (41.36%).
Sunday 23rd:
Corrie: 10.16m (41.52%);
Emmerdale: 7.71m (33.27%). :eek:
----
Now below are the one's you've all been waiting for:
Monday 24th:
EastEnders: 13.15m (52.88%);
Corrie 7:30: 12.24m (52.61%);
Corrie 8:30: 11.10m (43.73%);
Emmerdale: 9.08m (41.38%).
Victory for EE last night, but only just. They would have hoped for far better I am sure after all the hype. That said I think they'll do very well tonight, possibly 55%.
Richie_lecturer
26-10-2005, 14:24
Tuesday 25th:
EastEnders: 12.8m (55%);
Emmerdale: 8.0m (37%).
shannisrules
26-10-2005, 17:17
we did better than emmerdale on tuesday but 12 million isnt that much for a great episode
Mr Humphries
26-10-2005, 17:20
They are high now because Den has left the best storylines in foundations
crazygirl
26-10-2005, 18:24
what about the ratings for tuesday
Richie_lecturer
26-10-2005, 18:26
see 3 posts above you
callummc
01-11-2005, 23:45
well last weeks winners come unstuck last night,corrie have beaten the chuckle broyhers after just 1 week,ratings for last night are-corrie 12.7 with 51%share,EE 12.4 with 49%, corrie part2 - 10.6 with 46% and last emmerdale 8.8 with 41% share.
Richie_lecturer
02-11-2005, 12:58
EE did beat them, just on Friday night (51% to 49%), but I'm quoting from an unreliable source so cannot confirm that.
I'll have the full stats available later this afternoon. I've had problems with the official source lately and not sure if they are operating as normal again.
callummc
09-11-2005, 12:15
yes last week was neck and neck and it looks like this week will be to,although i aint looking forward to friday,ratings for monday were- corrie-12.225 with 53% share. EE- 12.213 with 51% share. corries 2nd show 11.7 with 46% share and last but not least emmerdale 9.9 with 45% share
Richie_lecturer
09-11-2005, 13:55
Last Friday was a close run thing as well. EE had more viewers (10.7m) to Corrie's 10.4m, but Corrie were 1-2% ahead on share which is what matters. Seems like Corrie are hanging on at the top atm, and with Ross Kemp leaving again in a few days, EE may fall back again. despite lots of big storylines concluding soon/characters leaving.
callummc
09-11-2005, 17:02
yes,it dosn't look so good for enders,and with alfies up and coming,i can cry episode on friday,i might turn of myself
Richie_lecturer
09-11-2005, 17:13
although Sarah Phelps is writing it. She is also writing the xmas episodes together with Tony Jordan.
callummc
11-11-2005, 00:23
sarah phelps is one of ee best writers but sadly shane ritchie cant cry or act,i hope they bought some of them strong french onions for him and he just has his eyes streaming and he dosn't try to boo hoo
Richie_lecturer
21-11-2005, 16:01
Since we last spoke, EE and Corrie have been neck and neck still. Emmerdale picked up a bit this week as well, getting a share as high as 48% on Wednesday, though only got 32% last night. EE's second episode on Thursday got 35% and is overall hovering around the 48-51% mark on average - about the same as Corrie.
Richie_lecturer
22-11-2005, 13:09
Corrie 7:30: 12.36m (52.9%);
EastEnders: 12m (49.9%);
Emmerdale : 10.13m (46.1%);
Corrie 8:30: 11.27m (44.5%);
Corrie 10pm: 9.24m (43.2%).
Corrie wins again. Good figures for its 10pm episode as well and for Emmerdale too last night. EE still strong but no match for Granada's flagship soap.
callummc
22-11-2005, 15:30
glad for emmerdale,their hard work paying of
callummc
26-11-2005, 01:37
well emmerdale have dpulled it of again last nihgt they got 8.2 and then 7.4 when they went up against enders who only got 7.3
Where do you get those ratings from?
callummc
26-11-2005, 11:16
last night manchester evening news,there was a peice about how well emmerdale has been doing this year
Richie_lecturer
26-11-2005, 13:47
I get mine from a subscription site which costs shedloads of money.
As for Thursday's figures, as commented on already:
Emmerdale average for the whole hour - 8.2m(38%)
When head to head with EE: 7.4m
EastEnders: 7.3m (35%)
So the gap between the two head to head soaps is much closer than previous occasions, due to the rise in popularity of EE.
Richie_lecturer
29-11-2005, 14:42
Friday night was close again, with Corrie just edging it in terms of both viewing figures and share.
The interesting news is last night's EE stats have slumped. Emmerdale had a really good share and had a higher share than EE last night. Don't think that's happened since EE's ratings 'slump' in July/August of this year.
Here we go:
Corrie 7.30: 12.35m (52.2%);
Emmerdale: 10.09m (46.4%);
Corrie 8.30: 11.71m (45.5%);
EastEnders: 10.97m (44.8%).
Is the EE 'honeymoon' over before it's barely begun?
callummc
29-11-2005, 23:54
I'm not suprised its gone boring again,they dont care who watches now,their just slinging a load of drivel togetheri wouldn't be suprised if instead of writing new scripts they've their using bits of old onesa lot of it seems familiar but with different charectors,and their putting all their efforts into christmas episodes
Yes three our four wonderful :rolleyes: episodes over Christmas and back to the same old keek afterwards until the sensational return of Miss Piggy :sick:
Richie_lecturer
02-12-2005, 13:46
Thursday's all important details of the head2head....
Emmerdale: 7.9m (39%);
EastEnders: 7.2m (34%);
At their highest points..
Emmerdale: 9.3m (47%);
EastEnders: 8.5m (39%).
So Emmerdale triumph again, this time by a much wider margin compared to last week's showdown.
Chris_2k11
02-12-2005, 13:48
Well this doesn't surprise me. EastEnders has been a disgrace this week.
Richie_lecturer
02-12-2005, 14:29
Actually, just found some data that might be of interest about last night. EE pipped Emmerdale when they were head to head by a whisker: 7.2m (34%) for EE, 7m for Emmerdale after 7:30. However this may be due to the fact that Emmerdale finished about 3-4 mins before EE so I reckon they would have actually been level last night, or even Emmerdale cleaned up on that front too. Who knows.
callummc
02-12-2005, 17:52
after this week i am really getting fed up,its got to have been the most boring week in ee history
i missed EE all week, but by the sounds of it i havent missed m uch. I really dont expct Emmerdale to beat EE in the ratings but they have.
Well this doesn't surprise me. EastEnders has been a disgrace this week.
It must have been bad for you and I to agree. It has been so disjointed with mediocre writing since the departure of Chuckle brothers :)
Richie_lecturer
03-12-2005, 15:16
It must have been bad for you and I to agree. It has been so disjointed with mediocre writing since the departure of Chuckle brothers :)
Replace '...the deaprture of Chuckle brothers' with 2002 and I'll agree. :(
Richie_lecturer
03-12-2005, 15:17
i missed EE all week, but by the sounds of it i havent missed m uch. I really dont expct Emmerdale to beat EE in the ratings but they have.
In a way they didn't actually, see my later response to the official figures for more details.
callummc
06-12-2005, 11:36
EE still not getting therelast nights winner was corrie with 11.4 and 51% share second corries second episode with 11.2 and 45% share,ee came in 3rd with 10.7 and 46% and last but not least with a good result for emmerdale of 9.1 and 44% share
Replace '...the deaprture of Chuckle brothers' with 2002 and I'll agree. :(
ok i agree 100% now
Richie_lecturer
13-12-2005, 17:23
Friday:
Corrie: 10.5m (50%)
EastEnders: 9.6m (44%)
Emmerdale: 8.5m (43%)
Monday:
Corrie 7:30: 11.7m (52%);
Corrie 8:30: 10.8m (44%);
EastEnders: 10m (43%);
Emmerdale: 9.2m (43%).
So EE slips back again, right back into the clutches of Emmerdale. Oh dear.
callummc
15-12-2005, 00:04
not only emmerdale but corries second episode is going above ee week on week now,and ee is losing out there cos up untill recently ee could beat that one,having had said that barring about 6 or 7 episodes ee has been rubbish snce christmas day,considering that ee was failing it is still failing only now only its more boring than it ever was
Richie_lecturer
19-12-2005, 02:54
if you ask me it's been rubbish since Steve Owen was fried, and the cracks (though still great at the time) started when the Slaters arrived....
....but that's another matter.
Chris_2k11
19-12-2005, 21:23
if you ask me it's been rubbish since Steve Owen was fried, and the cracks (though still great at the time) started when the Slaters arrived....
....but that's another matter.The Slaters have provided fantastic entertainment since 2000!
Richie_lecturer
19-12-2005, 22:25
Well i was just giving my opinion.........
Chris_2k11
19-12-2005, 22:26
Fair enough!
I think it was still good when the Slater's arrived. I'm not too sure when ee started to fall
xxx
Richie_lecturer
19-12-2005, 22:30
Well it didn't fall as such until late 2002, which up until then was still very good quality, but I saw the first chinks in the armour about 2 years prior to that.
Chris_2k11
19-12-2005, 22:31
I think it was still good when the Slater's arrived. I'm not too sure when ee started to fall
xxxI'd say when all this Sharon & Dennis stuff started.
callummc
26-12-2005, 15:05
Well EE have done it again,according to a post on talkwalford they have won the christmas day ratings,EE 10,1 with 44% next corrie 9.4 with 41% and lat emmerdale 6.6 with 34%,i wuld love to knoe how dr who did,for me it was the best show on last night,i actually thought ee was the worst christmas episde for years,just a rehash of old scripts fr different actors ie johnny - ruby = den and sharon, the ending was a copy of 2 years ago,the only bits that were good were sharon and dennis and i am not a shannis fan,and the millers and i'm no millers fan either,i feel ee would have been better if it had just been on for half an hour rather than stretching it out
Richie_lecturer
26-12-2005, 15:26
Yes I agree it was a terrible episode. I think the last 3 xmas day episodes have been very poor imo. I've forgotten what 2002 was about but I remember 2001 was brilliant. Sadly last night was very poor (see my repsonse on episode discussion thread). I thought Corrie was miles better last night than EE.
They probably 'won' because they had 2 big characters leaving, whilst Corrie, though they had some interesting storylines, had nothing really much going on. The EE episode had a bit more publicity as well on TV, so I'm not surprised they did the best out of the big three. EE is also still seen as the xmas day soap, whereas Corrie never used to have xmas day episodes until recently (unless they fell on a Monday, Wednesday and (in the 90s) a Friday). I expect that also counts towards the result.
What I was surprised about though was how low these ratings are for all of them, as xmas day normally adds quite a few extra viewers. The ratings last night were even lower than a normal episode. Unthinkable!
BlackKat
26-12-2005, 15:50
From the Sun:
EASTENDERS was Britain's favourite TV show this Christmas, according to figures released today.
More than 10 million viewers watched Alfie and Kat Moon leave Albert Square for good, with 11 million tuning in for the last 15 minutes of the hit BBC1 soap - 47.7 per cent of all those watching television at the time.
Dr Who was the second most watched show on Christmas Day, with 9.4million people tuning in to see David Tennant making his debut as the new Time Lord.
ITV1's highest placed programme was Coronation Street, which came third with the same viewing figures as the sci-fi series but a lower peak time viewing share.
Other highlights in the Top 10 were Ronnie Corbett's tribute to his comedy partner Ronnie Barker, animated movies Shrek and Toy Story and the Queen's speech.
The viewing figures will give a huge boost to the BBC, which has seven programmes in the Christmas Day Top 10, beating last year's total of five.
Christmas Day Top 10:
1. EastEnders (BBC1) - 10.1 million viewers
2. Dr Who (BBC1) - 9.4 million viewers
3. Coronation Street (ITV1) - 9.4 million viewers
4. Two Ronnies Christmas Sketchbook (BBC1) - 7.9 million viewers
5. Shrek (BBC1) - 6.7 million viewers
6. Emmerdale (ITV1) - 6.6 million viewers
7. Toy Story (BBC1) - 6.5 million viewers
8. Celebrity Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (ITV1) - 6.3 million viewers
9. The Queen's Speech (BBC1) - 6.2 million viewers
10. BBC News 6.50pm (BBC1) - 6.2 million viewers
Richie_lecturer
26-12-2005, 15:53
I should add that another reason EE did well is because BBC1 had a very strong xmas line-up as usual. ITV on the other hand don't bother much as they don't get much in the way of advertising revenue etc on Xmas Day, if you get what I mean.
.:SpIcYsPy:.
26-12-2005, 15:54
:cheer: :clap: :cheer: Go EE!! :cheer: :clap: :cheer:
callummc
28-12-2005, 12:51
EE won on boxing day with 9.7 watching dennis and sharon celibrate their pregnancy,while corrie got 9.1 watching clair and ashley celibrate their pregnancy,well done Ee for me it was a better episodes on boxing day and tuesday than christmas day,i for one hope the ratings stay up so mr big head dosn't feel the need to come back soon to save it,maybe things will pick up now,no alfie what a good reason to watch,i hope his car sinks as he rows it across the ocean to the USA
callummc
30-12-2005, 17:19
tues EE 10.7, emmerdale 8.3 Wed corrie 10.6 with 48% share EE 8.4 with 34% share,probably enders fault for not advertising extra episode or the fact i knew but chose not to miss the bill and watched later on bbc3 and for me it was a good episode better than christmas days,shame it did so badly
Richie_lecturer
03-01-2006, 17:36
EE thrashes the opposition in the ratings over xmas/ New Year.
More news to follow in full later.......
lollymay
03-01-2006, 17:39
yey go ee
callummc
04-01-2006, 14:16
ratings for dennis's exit-not as good as his daddys but still beat the opposition,with ee getting 12.2million and 50%share next was corrie with 10 mill and a42% share then emmerdale with8.4and a 37% share,the ratings for mondays soaps went ee way as well with enders getting 12 mill wth a 46% share nextwere the 2 corries getting 11.3 with 44% share and 10 mill wth 37% and then emmerdale with 9.4 and 39%
♥Lovin Me 4 Me♥
04-01-2006, 17:54
Yay!!! Ee finally getting back to the 12 million mark, even though i'd still rather have dennis back than those ratings!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.