PDA

View Full Version : Fathers For Justice Are Back



Bryan
20-05-2006, 23:00
The live National Lottery draw was held up when demonstrators invaded the stage at BBC Television Centre. Campaign group Fathers 4 Justice - which had officially been wound up - claimed responsibility. Protesters armed with flares, who had been in the audience, stormed the set of the BBC1 National Lottery: Jet Set programme.

The broadcast was taken off air for several minutes before the draw for this week's £17 million Superdraw jackpot was resumed.

Presenter Eamonn Holmes -

Advertisement
who was lead off stage by a protester - joked when the show resumed: "If anyone else is going to protest, please start now."

He said afterwards: "It was quite scary for us and the audience."

Guy Harrison, a spokesman for Fathers 4 Justice, said: "This marks the dramatic return of Fathers 4 Justice.

"The lottery is a metaphor for what can happen to any parent, mother or father, and their children, at the hands of the secret family courts.

"It's our duty to warn parents about what is happening and send them this message: don't play family law lotto - don't gamble with your kids."

BBC announcer Alan Dedicoat, the "voice of the balls" in the lottery draw, was forced to improvise a commentary tonight while the demonstrators were cleared from the studio.

He said: "The director, mercifully, cut away from most of what was going on and we were left with presenters Sarah Cawood and Eamonn Holmes in the shot.

"We got to a point where we felt we couldn't go any further so we just put up a caption."

Camelot spokesman Ben Rosier said: "It's amazing what people will do when there are 10 million people watching and £17 million up for grabs."

It is not clear what happened to the protesters.

Fathers 4 Justice, a parental rights group, was disbanded in January after some members were accused of plotting to kidnap Prime Minister Tony Blair's youngest son, Leo.

The Lottery stunt came two years after the group's notorious flour bomb attack in the House of Commons.

Tony Blair was hit by a purple flour-filled condom hurled from the public gallery by Mr Harrison during Prime Minister's Questions on May 19, 2004.

Dr. Tangliss
21-05-2006, 14:06
I really wished I watched it! Good on them!:cheer:

di marco
21-05-2006, 16:42
i saw it, it was quite funny lol!

Katy
21-05-2006, 16:48
people really should listen to them, they wont give up.

annaz
21-05-2006, 18:40
I really want help for these days but I don't think acting this way is helping at all.

dddMac1
22-05-2006, 13:18
they should get to see their kids but by Acting this way they are just going to make things worse for them and their kids cause the govorment will never listen to them

pookie1968uk
22-05-2006, 14:08
i support them in their cause and they feel very strongly about getting justice but demonstrating in this way often loses sympathy and probably doesnt help them in the long run.

Siobhan
22-05-2006, 14:13
I wholeheartly support there cause but i think they are getting the wrong attention... People will support them but they are now been labelled as trouble makers and distruptors which is not helping their cause at all

Dr. Tangliss
22-05-2006, 14:26
Yes, they are being labelled as being trouble makers, however, they have to go all out in order to be heard. I support them too, if a Dad wants a major part in him chids life, then who is the mother to stop him.

Siobhan
22-05-2006, 15:19
Yes, they are being labelled as being trouble makers, however, they have to go all out in order to be heard. I support them too, if a Dad wants a major part in him chids life, then who is the mother to stop him.

She doesn't or shouldn't stop a child seen its dad. When I split with my husband and he still came over every night to put our baby to bed, I was asked if I was mad to let him see her that often... my first thought was why shouldn't he see her... how would you feel if you were told as a child you couldn't see your dad.. that would have upset me.. He now still see her as often as he can and rings her all the time

Dr. Tangliss
22-05-2006, 17:14
Good on you!:thumbsup: That's refreshing to hear:)

Siobhan
22-05-2006, 17:38
Good on you!:thumbsup: That's refreshing to hear:)

I don't believe in using a child as a weapon in a relationship that has gone bad.. my ex is a great dad, lousy partner but I dont' have to live with him anymore and at the end of the day, it is the child that suffers if you don't allow them to see a parent... My little girl still have very close contact with her dads family and she loves been around them.. I might think differently if she said she was unhappy and didn't want to go... But if the person is a good parent, don't ever let a child suffer. They are people not things to be used against each other

Oh and I would never let anyone say a bad word about my ex in front of her and fair play to him, he doesn't let anyone say a bad word about me