View Full Version : Queen Vic Drama - Ian Ripped Off!
Daily Star Sunday:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/bondboffin/ian001.jpg
Ripped-off Ian's out on his ear
Hapless Ian beale falls foul of the Mitchell Brothers when they chuck him out of the Queen Vic soon after he finds out hes not the new owner.
The chippy boss wanted to expand his growing mepire by buying Albert Square's local from killer Chrissie Watts, played by Tracy-Ann Oberman.
But as he celebrates his deal, his old pal Sharon Rickman (Leititia Dean) breaks the news that her twisted step-mother forged the ownership documents - meaning the pub was never hers to sell.
Worse still he's already handed over a wad of cash to Chrissie and she's done a runner!
An insider said "Ian wanted to be top dog in Walford but Phil and Grant Mitchell would never let him get the Queen Vic.
"The Pub was the jewel in their empire and they will do anything to get it back. Ian is gutted but he knows better than to mess with the brothers and they take great passion in throwing him into the street."
Fans of the BBC1 soap, crowned Most Popular Serial Drama at the National Televison Awards can see the action a week on Thursday (November 10)
looks like chrissie leaves walford...a free woman???
and also it looks like den never gave her half of the vic...after all he did say that hed brought the pub for sharon, so why would he sign over half to chrissie? meaning she had no claims to the vic at all, not even the half that she thought den had gave her
shannisrules
30-10-2005, 13:13
so has she run off with jake then?
this means that sharon and dennis are the new owners yeah???
so has she run off with jake then?
sounds like it dont it...otherwise ian would be able to get his money back off her as the police would hand it him back
looks like chrissie leaves walford...a free woman???
and also it looks like den never gave her half of the vic...after all he did say that hed brought the pub for sharon, so why would he sign over half to chrissie? meaning she had no claims to the vic at all, not even the half that she thought den had gave her
No he did sign over half to her, it was like urmmm a present just before they renewed there vows.
So if it wasn't chrissie's pub to sell, as she orged the signature does that mean sharon gets the pub???
Chrissie to go free, its possible!
this means that sharon and dennis are the new owners yeah???
depends on who den left it to in his will...its gotta be sharon as shes his numbver one person and he said hed brought the vic for her, when he announced it at xmas
i dont think theytre gonna keep it tough, becuase chrissie offered them the pl;ace and they turned it downl, too many bad memories, if theyd wnated it they could have eaisly sold the bookies and brought it.... so i reckon sharon will sell it on...to the mitchells as an aplogy for the den con and the sam jail?
CrazyLea
30-10-2005, 13:17
i thought she got cuaght though
i thought she got cuaght though
they filemd 4 endings didnt they so as no one knew the outcome? that was just of the ones released to fool fans i suspect, who knows?
No he did sign over half to her, it was like urmmm a present just before they renewed there vows.
So if it wasn't chrissie's pub to sell, as she orged the signature does that mean sharon gets the pub???
Chrissie to go free, its possible!
this is the bloke that conned the vic in the first place...chrissie dent read the document it could have been a load of drivel or he could have ripped it up seconds later...no way would he give her half of the vic when it was meant for sharon
yes sharon would naturally get the vic, as den would have left it to her in the will, and if there wasnt a will iut would usually go toi chrissie, but seen as she'd have gained by murdering, she wouldt get it legally, so it would be sharons
BlackKat
30-10-2005, 13:25
I read somewhere that Jake ends up with the money from the Vic after Chrissie's arrested -- can't remember where though, or if it came with a source so don't quote me on it.
I think Chrissie does get caught though -- unless she escapes from police custody?
Chrissie does own half the pub -- I think it was her friend Amanda who sorted those papers out as well so I don't think it'll come out that Den forged it to keep Chrissie happy or anything.
So who does own the other half then -- the Mitchells can't just take it from Ian if Ian doesn't even own it. :searchme:
I read somewhere that Jake ends up with the money from the Vic after Chrissie's arrested -- can't remember where though, or if it came with a source so don't quote me on it.
I think Chrissie does get caught though -- unless she escapes from police custody?
Chrissie does own half the pub -- I think it was her friend Amanda who sorted those papers out as well so I don't think it'll come out that Den forged it to keep Chrissie happy or anything.
So who does own the other half then -- the Mitchells can't just take it from Ian if Ian doesn't even own it. :searchme:
the other half is naturally sharons! either by will or by legalities! if chrissie is in prison she will sell her half to sharon or someone to pay for her legal fees. I reckon sharon will sell her half to the mitchells soon as she dosent want the vic
BlackKat
30-10-2005, 13:37
If it's not Sharon's in the will, surely it would be split between Den's three children, not just Sharon.
kirsty_g
30-10-2005, 13:39
thanks for posting
If it's not Sharon's in the will, surely it would be split between Den's three children, not just Sharon.
yeah true but sharon and dennis constittute as one in terms of the show seen as they are an iteml, and well we'll be just made to believe that shannis buy vickys share or some tosh like that
If it's not Sharon's in the will, surely it would be split between Den's three children, not just Sharon.
Thats exactly what i've been thinking, also are these events not around the time Sharon and Dennis leave. So I'm guessing they want rid of the vic even if Shron does get it.
Also would Sharon give it back to the Mitchells after she find out Dennis and Den set Phil up and Den conned Sam out of the vic? ultimatlely leading to the downfall of the Mitchells?
sharon ahs the history with them, after this week i think theyll have made up... so its a case of i think she wants to sell it to them, maybe even just give it to them as an apology for the phil robbery set up, the dens sam con, and sam being set up for his murder
sharon ahs the history with them, after this week i think theyll have made up... so its a case of i think she wants to sell it to them, maybe even just give it to them as an apology for the phil robbery set up, the dens sam con, and sam being set up for his murder
Thats what I was thinking!!
Thats what I was thinking!!
she may even give it them now rather than the end of december, because we all know she dosent want the vic
she may even give it them now rather than the end of december, because we all know she dosent want the vic
mmm depends on how much input Dennis has.
Grant hit the nail on the head when he said "Whats happend to you Sharon you used to be so feisty and independant"
mmm depends on how much input Dennis has.
Grant hit the nail on the head when he said "Whats happend to you Sharon you used to be so feisty and independant"
when did he say that? cant remember?
but hes true tough thanks to that plank dennis sharons character has been ruined! bring on dennis' exit!
littlemo
30-10-2005, 14:01
I don't think Sharon can afford to give 'The Vic' away for free, I know Dennis has the bookies to sell, but The Vic would provide a huge amount. They could really live! If the Mitchells want 'The Vic' they should pay full price.
If Den had a will I think it should have been read by now, it's been 3 months. Perhaps you can't have a will if you have 'technically' been dead before. I'm not sure how it works. I assume Sharon got all of Den's money when he 'died' the first time around, she was his next of kin. Strictly speaking Sharon is his only child, he doesn't appear on Dennis or Vicki's birth certificate.
when did he say that? cant remember?
but hes true tough thanks to that plank dennis sharons character has been ruined! bring on dennis' exit!
Think it was Thurs? when him and Phil marched into the Vic and demanded to speak to Sharon and Dennis wouldnt let them.
Think it was Thurs? when him and Phil marched into the Vic and demanded to speak to Sharon and Dennis wouldnt let them.
kule! ill watch out for that in the omnibus!
I read somewhere that Jake ends up with the money from the Vic after Chrissie's arrested -- can't remember where though, or if it came with a source so don't quote me on it.
I think Chrissie does get caught though -- unless she escapes from police custody?
Chrissie does own half the pub -- I think it was her friend Amanda who sorted those papers out as well so I don't think it'll come out that Den forged it to keep Chrissie happy or anything.
So who does own the other half then -- the Mitchells can't just take it from Ian if Ian doesn't even own it. :searchme:
Yeh your right chrissie's friend amanda did it, sorted out the paperwork for the Vic, but then she also watched chrissie forge the documents too?
littlemo
30-10-2005, 14:06
mmm depends on how much input Dennis has.
Grant hit the nail on the head when he said "Whats happend to you Sharon you used to be so feisty and independant"
Yes he did, but I don't think that's Dennis's fault. It's the writers, or Den.
P.S- I've noticed that this board hasn't put the hour back. It is now almost 10 past 2.
I don't think Sharon can afford to give 'The Vic' away for free, I know Dennis has the bookies to sell, but The Vic would provide a huge amount. They could really live! If the Mitchells want 'The Vic' they should pay full price.
If Den had a will I think it should have been read by now, it's been 3 months. Perhaps you can't have a will if you have 'technically' been dead before. I'm not sure how it works. I assume Sharon got all of Den's money when he 'died' the first time around, she was his next of kin. Strictly speaking Sharon is his only child, he doesn't appear on Dennis or Vicki's birth certificate.
I think thats true, although it depends on what they have instore for Sharons exit if she was to just leave and forget about Albert Square, I'm not sure how Dennis will fit into all of this either, I dont think he'd be very please if Sharon was to just give the vic to the Mitchells. Thats of course assuming they are still together at this poiont.
I'm not sure about the technicallities of the estate of someone who's already been dead once!! But then there must be somthing as i'm guessing he did legally own the vic before he died??
BlackKat
30-10-2005, 14:09
If Den's still legally dead then wouldn't the Vic still belong to Sam -- that would be quite interesting, her entire reason for getting involved in the first place and she didn't even need to, :lol:
Did the police/authorities ever find out that Den wasn't dead. Surely they must have done, otherwise there'd have been a few raised eyebrows among them when he turned up dead a second time.
If Den's still legally dead then wouldn't the Vic still belong to Sam -- that would be quite interesting, her entire reason for getting involved in the first place and she didn't even need to, :lol:
Did the police/authorities ever find out that Den wasn't dead. Surely they must have done, otherwise there'd have been a few raised eyebrows among them when he turned up dead a second time.
yes becuase if you remember den got called into the police station for questioing for pretending to be dead, but nothing came off it
Yes he did, but I don't think that's Dennis's fault. It's the writers, or Den.
P.S- I've noticed that this board hasn't put the hour back. It is now almost 10 past 2.
The time's correct on mine, you need to have the GMT time selected in the user cp, edit options, time and date settings.
I don't think Sharon can afford to give 'The Vic' away for free, I know Dennis has the bookies to sell, but The Vic would provide a huge amount. They could really live! If the Mitchells want 'The Vic' they should pay full price.
If Den had a will I think it should have been read by now, it's been 3 months. Perhaps you can't have a will if you have 'technically' been dead before. I'm not sure how it works. I assume Sharon got all of Den's money when he 'died' the first time around, she was his next of kin. Strictly speaking Sharon is his only child, he doesn't appear on Dennis or Vicki's birth certificate.
i disagree, how would you feel if you got conned out of your house an dthen someone charged you to buy back what was yours in the first place!
littlemo
30-10-2005, 14:12
Yeh your right chrissie's friend amanda did it, sorted out the paperwork for the Vic, but then she also watched chrissie forge the documents too?
Yes. Well according to the article Sharon knows that Chrissie forged the document at this point, so I assume the Mitchells find something when they go searching in the Vic.
I wonder if we'll see Amanda again, if they have a court case she'd have to appear in it, I should think. I think Amanda deserves to lose her job over this, I know she had nothing to do with the murder, but what she did was wrong. And it doesn't say much for her as a lawyer if she can't see when somebody is lying.
xsoftladybugx
30-10-2005, 14:13
Haaa shame Ian!!
Yes. Well according to the article Sharon knows that Chrissie forged the document at this point, so I assume the Mitchells find something when they go searching in the Vic.
I wonder if we'll see Amanda again, if they have a court case she'd have to appear in it, I should think. I think Amanda deserves to lose her job over this, I know she had nothing to do with the murder, but what she did was wrong. And it doesn't say much for her as a lawyer if she can't see when somebody is lying.
Does anyone know if we are going to see a trial?
Amanda should loose her job after all she did commit fraud.
littlemo
30-10-2005, 14:22
i disagree, how would you feel if you got conned out of your house an then someone charged you to buy back what was yours in the first place!
Annoyed, but it doesn't belong to Den anymore. On Friday night when Chrissie was explaining that she gave Sam money because she felt bad about them getting the Vic off her, Sharon said 'It was hardly your fault was it?'. We all know it was Chrissie's fault but it wasn't Sharon's. I don't think she should feel responsible for what her father and Chrissie did.
However I do think it would be nice of her to give the Vic to the Mitchells, because of what's happened. But it's not obligatory, they've done a lot of stuff to the Watts Family too.
littlemo
30-10-2005, 14:28
Does anyone know if we are going to see a trial?
Amanda should loose her job after all she did commit fraud.
I'm not sure if we will see a trial, but I think it would be great if we did! I really want to see Chrissie up in the dock, being punished for what she's done. And the look on everybody's face when they say she's guilty. It would be fantastic! How many people would be called to the defence?! Not many! I suppose Kat and Stacey might feel obliged, but everyone else will hate her.
I really hate Amanda. I know we haven't seen her in many scenes, but the way she was with Dennis and Sharon was unexcusable. Den bought the Vic for Sharon, maybe Chrissie is entitled to some of it by law, but certainly she can't kick Dennis and Sharon out onto the streets. Probably legally, but I think it's terrible. Amanda has no morals at all.
I'm not sure if we will see a trial, but I think it would be great if we did! I really want to see Chrissie up in the dock, being punished for what she's done. And the look on everybody's face when they say she's guilty. It would be fantastic! How many people would be called to the defence?! Not many! I suppose Kat and Stacey might feel obliged, but everyone else will hate her.
I really hate Amanda. I know we haven't seen her in many scenes, but the way she was with Dennis and Sharon was unexcusable. Den bought the Vic for Sharon, maybe Chrissie is entitled to some of it by law, but certainly she can't kick Dennis and Sharon out onto the streets. Probably legally, but I think it's terrible. Amanda has no morals at all.
I'd love to see a trial, Chrissie would be great in court, either calm and calculating or hysterical and wailing!! We dont see enough trials in Albert Square!
_lil_hunni
30-10-2005, 15:33
Wow!I hope what the papers said is true about Ian +The Vic and chrissie running off with his money.
Btw Id love to see a trial aswell, it would be fantastic. All the great characters that are envolved-Zoe,Kat,Stacey,Sam,Phil,Grant,Peggy,Billy,Sharon,D ennis,Jonny Allen,now Ian by the sounds of it. And that woman Amanda would probly have to give evidence as well as Jake.
It would be interesting to see how chrissie would play it, probly try to manipulate the Jury but she might crack when Sharon is giving evidence.I'd want her to be found not guilty just to see the looks on everyones face!:) I still want chrissie to escape though, they could always bring her back for a trial:)
Chloe O'brien
30-10-2005, 15:39
i wish they would bring in new owners for the vic it get's boring the same old people running it all the time
lollymay
30-10-2005, 17:03
i want the mitchells to get it back again or sharon but shes leaving though
Johnny Allen
30-10-2005, 17:10
Peggy's got to get back behind the bar, glad Ian is getting ripped off, he deserves it.
eastenders mad
30-10-2005, 17:30
wow. so does that mean the Mitchells ahve got the pub or the Watts still have the pub.
I am confussed lol.
Does that mean that Chrissie will run away? but eventually get caught at the airport?
Daily Star Sunday:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/bondboffin/ian001.jpg
Ripped-off Ian's out on his ear
Hapless Ian beale falls foul of the Mitchell Brothers when they chuck him out of the Queen Vic soon after he finds out hes not the new owner.
The chippy boss wanted to expand his growing mepire by buying Albert Square's local from killer Chrissie Watts, played by Tracy-Ann Oberman.
But as he celebrates his deal, his old pal Sharon Rickman (Leititia Dean) breaks the news that her twisted step-mother forged the ownership documents - meaning the pub was never hers to sell.
Worse still he's already handed over a wad of cash to Chrissie and she's done a runner!
An insider said "Ian wanted to be top dog in Walford but Phil and Grant Mitchell would never let him get the Queen Vic.
"The Pub was the jewel in their empire and they will do anything to get it back. Ian is gutted but he knows better than to mess with the brothers and they take great passion in throwing him into the street."
Fans of the BBC1 soap, crowned Most Popular Serial Drama at the National Televison Awards can see the action a week on Thursday (November 10)
Thanks for posting.
wow. so does that mean the Mitchells ahve got the pub or the Watts still have the pub.
I am confussed lol.
Does that mean that Chrissie will run away? but eventually get caught at the airport?
That would mean that Sharon has the pub.
Yes, im 99.9% sure that Chrissie gets caught at the airport as it was in the sun in August. She gets caught when the police and Sharon catch up with her and Jake at the airport, when they think they have got away and are minutes away from boarding their plane.
i want the mitchells to get it back again or sharon but shes leaving though
Sharon should get the Vic when the truth comes out about the documents. She is returning in 2006.
lollymay
30-10-2005, 18:57
i hope sharon gets it back after she returns but i think the mitchells will get it though
I think Sharon will get the Vic when the truth comes out about the forged documents and then sell it to the Mitchells before she leaves at Christmas, as when Chrissie gave her first refusal about buying the Vic, she and Dennis decided against it because of bad memories.
Just what I think. This is not nessecarily going to happen.
littlemo
30-10-2005, 20:00
I think Sharon will get the Vic when the truth comes out about the forged documents and then sell it to the Mitchells before she leaves at Christmas, as when Chrissie gave her first refusal about buying the Vic, she and Dennis decided against it because of bad memories.
Just what I think. This is not nessecarily going to happen.
Yes I think your right. Dennis doesn't want to stick around Walford, he has only stayed for Sharon. I think Sharon will get the Vic because she was Den's next of kin when he 'died' the first time, and if Chrissie's going to be in prison, she can't get any of his money or the pub.
Sharon could then sell the pub to the Mitchells.
i'm glad Ian gets ripped off
mara jade
31-10-2005, 21:59
I hope Sharron does get the vic back, seems pretty logical to me.
But I don't want her to give/sell it to the Mitchell because of the way Den conned them out of the vic etc...Has everyone forgotten what the Mitchells have done to Sharron and the rest of the Watts. Does anyone remember the fire at Angies Den that nearly killed Vicky?
Don't get me wrong I love the Mitchells. I just want to see a new face behind the bar of the queen vic.
callummc
01-11-2005, 08:48
I agree with you jade,sharon should keep the vic,sam deserved to lose the vic,a pub for a club,if the mitchells hadn't burnt down the club i might feel sorry for them,but they did and so deserved to know what its like to lose
crazygirl
01-11-2005, 12:55
sharon sells the vic to the mitchells next week she thinks she owes them that because they framed chrissie
sharon sells the vic to the mitchells next week she thinks she owes them that because they framed chrissie
oh no! i really didnt want them to get the vic again
Mr Humphries
03-11-2005, 00:41
I am so confused with this
JustJodi
03-11-2005, 06:47
sharon sells the vic to the mitchells next week she thinks she owes them that because they framed chrissie
How did the Mitchells FRAME Chrissie ??? She DID KILL DEN so she wasn't framed....gawd I am getting more confused reading these posts ...:confused:
JustJodi
03-11-2005, 06:48
I am so confused with this
Sweetie you and me both .. so sit down on the confused couch with me :searchme:
brenda1971
03-11-2005, 09:59
I thought that I read somewhere that chrissie ends up going down for murder
i wish they would bring in new owners for the vic it get's boring the same old people running it all the time
I agree with you on this one... I wouldn't even have minded Ian getting it. At least it's someone different!!
I thought that I read somewhere that chrissie ends up going down for murder
Yeah she does, because Dennis managed to break Stacey's alibi.
Mr Humphries
05-11-2005, 07:15
I really hoped that Ian had got it, its such a shame that the flaming mitchells are going to get it back
soapyclean
05-11-2005, 10:51
We knew he wouldnt keep the pub, and we will find out how Chrissie goes down next week so keep our hair on :D
Jada-GDR
11-11-2005, 14:43
:D YAY THE MITCHELL BROTHERS GET THE VIC BACK :D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.