Personally I don't think any verification was needed at the end of this episode and I think EE have played a blinder in order to build up the suspense into next week and the weeks that follow where it will all be revealed. EE's slogan used to be "Everyones talking about it", lol, and even after we have seen who it is, everyone is still going "Who is it?" lol! Well done EE!
Last edited by Florijo; 21-09-2007 at 22:45.
Siobhan (24-09-2007)
I don't agree with you there, they showed some oink with spots and we are meant to know who they are??? Young peeps into enders would not even have a blues clue who they were if they did not watch it since the 80/early 90's
Last edited by Dr. Tangliss; 21-09-2007 at 23:04.
From what I read in digital spy, Jane is initially hostile towards Steven - rejecting his offer to help her in the cafe, brushing him off onto Kevin, rebuffing his attempt to comfort her next thursday biut next Friday when Steven alone is supposedly there for her though we know different, she cries on his shoulder. What i am wondering is, why is she initally hostile towards him? I mean surely she can't suspect though we know that he is responsible for Ian's disappearance and if she did she would tell the police, not cry on his shoulder.
I'm sure we will find out eventually.
I assume Ian's in that flat and his breakfast, lunch and dinner are those cream crackers!
Mmm I suppose. Surely even Steven wouldn't have killed him?
I thought at first Steven was holding him hostage but then I wondered why he would come back to Walford leaving Ian alone in that flat. I mean even if the doors were locked and bolted Ian could break a window and get out couldn't he?
On the other hand they wouldn't have Steven getting away with killing Ian so if he is indeed to be a long term charecter he wouldn't have killed him. Yet if Ian is alive why hasn't he ontacted Jane or the police? Former stepson or not, surely there is a line and Steven has crossed it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)