Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Dirty Dens Return a mistake

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In Purgatory.
    Posts
    10,588
    Thanked: 1221
    It took them five years to admit something that millions of viewers knew already. Although EE has had some good storylines over the last few months and had some good characters such as Stella. However its going to take more than a good few episodes to get back to their peak on what they used to be.

    Thanks to Vicky for my great new banner xxx
    "Maddest Member again How come I've been taking my meds"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,474
    Thanked: 71
    I doubt it will never be as good as it was - which soap is? Except maybe HO they have all declined.

    So far this new producer seems okay. I just wish the BBC would admit that going four times a week have made things worse and go back to three...but they never will.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In Purgatory.
    Posts
    10,588
    Thanked: 1221
    Quote Originally Posted by Florijo View Post
    I doubt it will never be as good as it was - which soap is? Except maybe HO they have all declined.

    So far this new producer seems okay. I just wish the BBC would admit that going four times a week have made things worse and go back to three...but they never will.
    Going back to twice a week would be better. The acting would improve as it would give cast members longer to learn their lines, and the writers could have more time to create better storylines.

    Thanks to Vicky for my great new banner xxx
    "Maddest Member again How come I've been taking my meds"

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    13,954
    Thanked: 549
    The fact its on 4 nights a week has got nothing to do with it. Hollyoaks is on 5 and still manages to be consistently good.
    Happy New Year SoapBoards!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In Purgatory.
    Posts
    10,588
    Thanked: 1221
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris_2k7 View Post
    The fact its on 4 nights a week has got nothing to do with it. Hollyoaks is on 5 and still manages to be consistently good.
    Yeah but when you consider that a few years ago they were getting over 20 million viewers a night for only being two episodes a week plus the repeat on Sunday does make a difference. Although I tyhink a drop in ratings is mainly due to viewers watching the episodes at different times not just at 7.30pm on a Tuesday and Thursday I don't think it would do any the soaps any harm to cut back on the amount of episodes aired in a week.

    Thanks to Vicky for my great new banner xxx
    "Maddest Member again How come I've been taking my meds"

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    6,634
    Thanked: 582
    Quote Originally Posted by Chloe O'Brien View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris_2k7 View Post
    The fact its on 4 nights a week has got nothing to do with it. Hollyoaks is on 5 and still manages to be consistently good.
    Yeah but when you consider that a few years ago they were getting over 20 million viewers a night for only being two episodes a week plus the repeat on Sunday does make a difference. Although I tyhink a drop in ratings is mainly due to viewers watching the episodes at different times not just at 7.30pm on a Tuesday and Thursday I don't think it would do any the soaps any harm to cut back on the amount of episodes aired in a week.
    I do agree with Kath. It's a bit of overkill thinking about how much soap is on each week (even though i'm a big fan). Emmerdale is on 6 nights a week which is absolutely ridiculous! I can imagine the actors being worn out, and the writing team being extremely tight to deadlines and it's not in its best state at the moment in my opinion, so cutting it back to 3 nights, even 2 nights a week would do it a world of good i think.

    The same for all the other soaps - Hollyoaks may be fantastic at 5 nights a week at the moment, but imagine how great it would be if it's only on 2 nights a week?! The producers, writers and actors would have more time to invest effort into the show making it even better. I'm sure the viewers would be gripped if it was only on 2 nights a week...then they had to wait until the next week to find out what happened next! I think the interest would increase dramatically! The same counts for Eastenders and Corrie. It'll be good for all the soaps in my opinion and viewers would be able to invest less of their time in watching their favourite tv show (sometimes it's hard to catch up on the soaps because of how much they are on) and they would stop clogging up the schedules.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In Purgatory.
    Posts
    10,588
    Thanked: 1221
    This was one of the main reasons why I stopped watching the soaps 7 years ago because I knew that if I missed an episode mid-week I could catch up at the weekend, now you can catch up whenever you like, you don't even have to watch the soaps now to know who's who and what is happening. I prefer to watch programmes that I don't know how they are going to end. So I can say Holy S**t. If the writers don't want to cut back on the number of episodes shown in a week then they should think about cutting back on the media coverage they give to future storylines and not reveal plots months in advance.

    Thanks to Vicky for my great new banner xxx
    "Maddest Member again How come I've been taking my meds"

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,122
    Thanked: 5
    well everyone knows i am glad den came back,i dont think it can be blamed for the state of enders now,i will agree the storyline was far fetched but worth it for the week he returned and the episode with dot and den in the laundrette,it wasnt the actors fault that his other scripts were crap,ie den and zoey-more rfar fetched than his return from the dead,p ersonally coudn't stand cat and alfie,liked sharon and dennis but as brother and sister got fed up with thefar fetched love storys for all 4 of them,moving on to another far fetched storyline which is also boring a far fetched one of mr santers,the return of steven beale,where did a 17 year old boy get the money to fly home from new zealand more important where did he get the money to buy expensive wreaths and a coffins etc,the show at the moment is up and down,and lets not forget enders do far fetched all the time including the return of phill who was looking at a long sentance and just got out,the terrible writing is the shows main problem and you sometimes think they are re using old scripts,enders still needs a lot of work to make it watchable again,and dens return was more entertaining for me than the boring garbage of last year,enders main problem is how they change charectors personalitys overnight,and they have lost the plot on many occaisions with ridiculas storylines,they also drag storylines out for to longand somtimes forget important details,personally i think enders is a casualty of its oiwn early sucsess and if they really miss any charector its pauline fowler who was the backbone of the show and without her its gone further downhill lets face it for years it could have been the mitchell show,or the slater show,the watts show not to mention the boring charectors that have been pushed to the front allways overlooking the likes of dot,patrick,big mo and quite a few more who get dropped for a month of sean slater or shirley or deano etc etc

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Walford convent home for fallen women
    Posts
    2,409
    Thanked: 173
    Quote Originally Posted by callummc View Post
    well everyone knows i am glad den came back,i dont think it can be blamed for the state of enders now
    I think EE is in a lot better state now, than when Den came back from the dead. That was a complete mistake and an insult to the viewer's intelligence.

    Quote Originally Posted by callummc View Post
    a far fetched one of mr santers, the return of steven beale,where did a 17 year old boy get the money to fly home from new zealand more important where did he get the money to buy expensive wreaths and a coffins
    Yep it was a little OTT, but nevertheless I found it a gripping storyline, and at least Steven had been alive and kicking in New Zealand, and hadnt returned from the dead.

    Quote Originally Posted by callummc View Post
    if they really miss any charector its pauline fowler who was the backbone of the show and without her its gone further downhill.
    I have to disagree, I think the show is managing just fine without her, the show isnt and shouldnt revolve around just one character. I havent missed her character at all. Plus, EE has introduced some really good characters of late.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •