Page 2 of 18 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 180

Thread: EE lost to emmerdale again

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,122
    Thanked: 5
    well is official now,media guardian are reporing Ee lowes ever veiwing figures fo last night-Emmerdale 6.7 with a 41%share and EE 3.9 with 23% share

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    13,954
    Thanked: 549
    EE loses out to Emmerdale again and rightly so. I've enjoyed about one or two episodes of EE in the past couple of weeks and that's it. Saying that, Emmerdale hasn't been great these past few months but has certainly improved in the last few weeks. I even find a soap like Hollyoaks which rarely pulls in 2 million viewers these days much more entertaining with far better decent storylines and scripts. For a start off EE need to stop bringing in so many new characters all the time. There's usually at least one every couple of weeks and it's getting plain stupid. It's turned into a completely different show nowadays and things aren't looking good.
    Happy New Year SoapBoards!

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    council flat :)
    Posts
    1,504
    Thanked: 13
    2006 has been an odd year...coronation street was great during the mike baldwin stuff but thats it and eastenders was ok during the jhonny allen stuff but thats it

    emmerdale has been consitent all through out the year...my personal faviroute hollyoaks has been very underestimated and like emmerdale very consitent.

    eastenders has nothing that really grips me anymore I hear they got a good summer coming and a hot christmas storyline but thats not good enough eastenders is on every week in the year it shouldnt just focus on summer and christmas storylines that are huge and not bother with the rest.
    Eastenders should be gritty but its turning into a joke too many pointless storys (e.g paulines wedding to joe)

    There's usually at least one every couple of weeks and it's getting plain stupid
    true and they dont give us a reason to like them Jack was a new character we liked yet he went so soon..no fault of eastenders mind,yet deano 'walfords new heartthrob' what is his purpose he is so dull he could be a great character but all he does is sit in the pub and wind up bradley and
    in genral be a younger garry hobbs.

    I could go on and on

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,429
    Thanked: 1130
    Although I'm a big fan of EastEnders, I am not surprised that they lost out to Emmerdale on Tuesday, it being the run up to the fire at King's river.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,486
    Thanked: 309
    Now being reported on the BBC Site:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5180518.stm


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    In my brand new house
    Posts
    16,252
    Thanked: 581
    Quote Originally Posted by callummc
    well is official now,media guardian are reporing Ee lowes ever veiwing figures fo last night-Emmerdale 6.7 with a 41%share and EE 3.9 with 23% share
    6.7m, thats not that much either to normal viewing figures is it? (or i could just be talking a load of rubbish lol!) also, was emmerdale on from 7 til 8, cos if it was then people just probably carried on watching emmerdale through and recorded ee, thats what i normally do when im watching something (im not saying that i dont agree with other peoples comments about ee not being that good at present, and i cant compare it to emmerdale cos i dont watch it, im just trying to think if there are any other reasons why it might have happened)
    ~x~Tizzy~x~
    A fool and his money are a girl's best friend


    thanks to vicky for making the banna!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    6,634
    Thanked: 582

    Cool

    I am not surprised Emmerdale beat EE, i watched Emmerdale over EE on Tuesday and Thursday, EE doesn't have anything big happening at the moment while Emmerdale does because of the explosion at the development so i am not surprised.

    What i am surprised about is that EE only got 3.9 million viewers!!
    I know Emmerdale would have beat EE, but i thought EE's ratings would have been higher!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,429
    Thanked: 1130
    Yeah it was on from 7 until 8. In all honesty I would have kept Emmerdale on regardless, had I been in control of the remote. I think Emmerdale also timed it so that the explosion began at the exact time you would need to switch so you didn't miss any of EastEnders, in order to capture more viewers.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,781
    Thanked: 27
    Even though there is evidence that Easties is losing it big time, espec to Emmerdale , they who run the show are still in denial and are claiming that the show is still blossoming and pulling in the viewers, IMO (re:Article mentioned above) So it seems to me that they are in "Big" trouble and just won't admit it, the soap is sinking fast.

    A Very Sexy and Brilliant Actor

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    13,954
    Thanked: 549
    I can't understand why anybody would have chosen to watch EE on Thursday night knowing that something as good as this was going to happen in Emmerdale. (Unless of course you've never watched Emmerdale before which is obviously an exception! lol)
    Happy New Year SoapBoards!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •