Originally Posted by alan45
Away
Away
They should just keep him out of the programme it can go on without him!
Member
It would be a massive mistake to replace Phil. Steve McFadden was in a ten year relationship with this person with two kids, so it's not as if he has raped any one.
Their private life is exactly that...private. As far as I can see it is a case of sour grapes if not then she willingly participated...whichever he has not commited a crime..get real. He should be kept on the show and his comments about other cast members (probably blown out of all proportion) are mostly correct!
Senior Member
No way could they get away with replacing Phil - HUGE MISTAKE!!
Sooz
**Debs Official Stalker**
I think changing someone because of hearsay is pretty daft and they shouldn't replace him if thats what they are going to do, just not have the character back at all. EE was excellent for a long time before Phil's arrival and has/will carry on after he has left. But facts should be checked before decisions like this are made. Like has been said, it could be a case of sour grapes and needing some money, so lets do a kiss and tell.
Jack's back in 24.
They can't replace Steve McFadden, but if they have to get rid of him then write Phil out of the soap.
Thank you Jessie Wallace
Senior Member
They should kill him off,it wouldn't work,bring in a new actor as a new charector,there are certain charectors that can cot be changed and he is 1 of them,get out the doggie doorstop again,adogger doorstep for a dogger,now that would be appropiate
Senior Member
It could be Lupus?
They can't replace Phil Mitchell!
Senior Member
exactly
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
