no bianca or leo's mum for the trial
no bianca or leo's mum for the trial
I know lawyers are given certain leeway in questioning people but does anyone else think the one questioning Whitney was WAY out of order as well as overly aggresive.
The whole trial was a complete farce. Both Whitney and Mick were defence witnesses and should have been called by the defence and asked to give their account first. The scriptwriters obviously haven't got the faintest idea how English trials work, nor did they bother to do any research. Utter nonsense.
lizann (12-10-2020)
I primarily thought the way he instantly attacked Whitney about her previous relationships. The only way that would have had any relevance would be if she had attempted to kill or harm her previous boyfriends. As she said, this was just a cheap attempt to make her look bad. I wonder what would have happened if the trial had got far enough that it would have mentioned him camping in her loft with a hole drilled in the ceiling...
lizann (12-10-2020), Ruffed_lemur (12-10-2020)
do ruby and martin know about jags, ruby knows it was vinny
kaz21 (12-10-2020)
So mick was abused. Poor Frankie finding out that.
kaz21 (12-10-2020)
Denise needs to warn the child's grandmother about Mitchell.
kaz21 (13-10-2020)
Do Stacey and Kat never learn, honestly, Ruby should terminate their contract at the club as I wouldn't trust either of them to be there. The only thing is that Jean works with the cleaning as well and it would punish her.
I'm not Ruby's greatest fan but really don't like Stacey.
a wedding party with no guests only crashers who were stealing, ruby really rubbing stacey's face in it, that friendship over
shirley was phenomenal
There are currently 30 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 30 guests)